Thursday , May 23 2024
Star Trek will certainly feed the hungry fans, but the meal is a bit overcooked.

Movie Review: Star Trek

Written by Hombre Divertido

In 1994 Paramount transitioned the Star Trek movie franchise from the original cast to the Next Generation cast in Generations, which conveniently served its purpose. Not a great film, but it worked. Captain Picard and his crew followed Generations with the huge home run First Contact in 1996, but then killed the franchise with the two yawners that were Insurrection (1998) and Nemesis (2002). Since then Trek fans have had little to embrace other than the under-appreciated television series Enterprise which lasted until 2005.

The year 2008 was to be the rebirth for the franchise, but the writers' strike kept anxious fans waiting another six months. On May 8, 2009, the highly anticipated re-tooling of the original series hit the big screen courtesy of Paramount and current Hollywood wonder boy J.J. Abrams.

Much like Generations, the film certainly serves its purpose in launching what is sure to be a profitable string of films, but unlike Generations, this film tends to be a bit over produced.

The 2009 version of Star Trek reintroduces us to the original cast of characters from the 1966 television series, in relative infancy in their respective Starfleet careers, as they set out to stop a rogue Romulan ship from destroying the planet Vulcan. Most of the new cast takes their own interpretation on the roles, with the exception of Karl Urban who steals every scene he is in with a dead-on portrayal of DeForest Kelly's Dr. Leonard “Bones” McCoy.

The other six lead characters tend to be hit and miss as they attempt to settle into these iconic roles. Chris Pine shows enough untamed energy to make his Kirk work, and has a more obvious sense of humor than that which Shatner displayed. Zachary Quinto may need another film or two to figure out how he wants to play Spock, as the half-human/half-Vulcan complexities may have been a bit out of his range. The experienced comedic actor Simon Pegg makes some very strong character choices as Scotty, but it will remain to be seen if the comedic portrayal of the chief engineer will be as endearing in future endeavors.

Making safer choices with their interpretations are Zoe Saldana as Uhura, and John Cho as Sulu. Both performances are adequate. Neither attempts an impression of their predecessors, and both bring some slight new dimensions to the characters. Anyone who has seen Trek alum Garrett Wang do his Sulu impression must wonder why he was not considered for the role. Anton Yelchin rounds out the cast as Chekov, and his accent adds some early smiles, but his painfully slow delivery eventually bogs down many scenes.

J.J. Abrams displays an ambitious style in his direction of a story by Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman, but, as clearly shown in the scene where Kirk is being chased by ridiculous CGI creatures, just because you can create something, does not mean you should. Some of the special effects, such as the previously mentioned creatures, simply look awful and are well below the standards set by previous sci-fi fare.

Abrams' need for extreme close-ups of his actors becomes increasingly distracting as the film progresses, and detracts from many action scenes. An action sequence, such as the barroom fight between Kirk and some Starfleet cadet goons, has not been ruined this badly by poor directorial choices since the on-foot chase scene with Keanu Reeves pursuing Patrick Swayze in Point Break.

The only thing more distracting than some of the directorial choices is the heavy-handed musical score by Michael Giacchino, who often appears to be trying to create excitement or drama that simply is not there, and in some case shouldn’t be.

Where Star Trek does work is when it keeps it simple. There are some wonderful dialog-driven moments, and Trekkies will be all smiles at gems such as where the nickname “Bones” stems from, how Christopher Pike (played with subtle brilliance by Bruce Greenwood) ended up in a wheelchair, or Kirk in bed with a green Orion slave woman (though some may say that scene ignores facts revealed in an Enterprise episode).

A solid villain is always key to the success of such endeavors and Star Trek does not disappoint on this front as Eric Bana's psychotic, revenge-seeking Nero definitely leaves the audience wanting more. Unfortunately Nero is piloting a huge mass of jagged metal pieces that we never see all of, nor is its weaponry ever clearly defined, and the battle between Kirk and Nero on a platform within the ship looks far too similar to a scene from another sci-fi franchise that may have fans waiting for Nero to announce that he is Kirk's father.

Recommendation: Star Trek is bound to make a mint, as fans who have been waiting far too long for anything Trek-related will transport themselves to the theatre in droves. There are enough shout-outs to the faithful in the first half of the film to keep them smiling through what is essentially a weak story. There is certainly enough action to leave the non-Trekkies satisfied as well. Nonetheless, time travel as a solution is tired, the story has too many holes, the direction and score are too heavy-handed, some of the special effects are weak, and more of the characters would have been better. As Trek films go, this one will be hard pressed to crack the top three.

Obviously more liberties can be taken in future outings now that we are on a new timeline, but lets hope that writers will keep it simple, and focus more on dialog and the characters that fans want to see, know, and love.

About Cinema Sentries

Formerly known as The Masked Movie Snobs, the gang has unmasked, reformed as Cinema Sentries, and added to their ranks as they continue to deliver quality movie and entertainment coverage on the Internet.

Check Also

Photo of Brent Spiner

GalaxyCon Richmond: Brent Spiner on Playing Data in ‘Star Trek: Picard’ and More

"There wasn't a real precedent on how you play an android."