Today on Blogcritics
Home » TV » Genres tv » Drama » TV Review: ‘Rake’

TV Review: ‘Rake’

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on Twitter9Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

I want to start this review by saying that, for me, Rake had three great things going into it a priori: Greg Kinnear (whose work I’ve always enjoyed), and the idea that FOX’s new series was House, M.D., but with lawyers, not doctors. Third, the series is executive produced and written by Peter Tolan (Rescue MeThe Larry Sanders ShowMurphy Brown). Rake’s creator/executive producer/writer is Australian film director/writer Peter Duncan. I really, really wanted to love the new show. And I’m really disappointed that I do not (at least not yet). But I’m willing to be persuaded.Greg-Kinnear-and-the-cast-of-Rake.

Rake is about Keegan Deane (known to all as Kee, and played by the wonderful Greg Kinnear), a lawyer who is sort of a screw up. He’s in debt to his bookie, and he’s narcissistic and self-destructive. In other words, his life is a chaotic mess. He takes advantage of family and friendship, but he’s actually quite good at his job as a defense attorney (but it’s not clear from the pilot episode that he’s not just luckier in work than he is at gambling). And he is (as it says in FOX’s press release) “frustratingly charming.”

A brilliant lawyer he may be, but brilliant at living, he’s not. Yes, he gets by on his charm and considerable persuasive skills, but during the pilot episode “Serial Killer,” he shleps a rare fish around with him in hopes of selling it to pay back his bookie, the fish gets older and less valuable, and by the end, it all seems rather pointless and stupid, especially for a lawyer whose best asset (besides his charm) is supposedly his big brain. I can see this sort of plot line working better, a little further on in the series, once Kee’s character is better established, and we understand he’s not really quite as stupid as he comes across here.

I get the comparison to House, M.D. Like the main character of the dearly departed Fox series that ran from 2004-2012, Kee is bad at life except when it counts. For Dr. Gregory House, that was the in curing illness; with Kee it is with getting justice for his client.

But House was subtle in ways that Rake can only aspire, and from the first scenes of the pilot episode, the viewer got a sense there was much more than a smart-ass doctor with a limp. House was a guy who fundamentally saw the illness as injustice that had to be righted. We understood from the start that House was troubled, and we wanted to know why. We saw his brilliance, and comprehended that beneath the jerk, lay, well…still a jerk, but a jerk with a well-hidden compassion to go along with his big brain.

In Rake, we don’t really see much of Kee’s purported brilliance in the pilot. I wish we had; instead, he spends more of his time trying to dodge the loan shark’s enforcer and charm his annoyed family than pursuing justice. Kinnear is fine as Rake’s anti-hero. As always, he’s charming and intelligent. But for me to really get into this show, I’d like to see a lot more depth to both the stories and the character. I think if the episode spent more time diving into his brilliance — what makes Kee unique — and less on his quirky side, I would have been far more impressed. 

But it’s early in the game, and Rake isn’t by any means a bad show; it has its moments (especially the courtroom scenes), and there are flashes of real potential in places. I have hopes that the series will find the right balance between the funny-quirky side of Kee and his intelligent-intellectual side: the comedy and the drama/character study. A film actor for years, Kinnear chose this show to be his debut in television for a reason, and I’m willing to give the series another episode or three to understand why.

Rake airs Thursday nights on FOX.

Powered by

About Barbara Barnett

Barbara Barnett is publisher and executive editor of Blogcritics, as well as a noted entertainment writer. Author of Chasing Zebras: The Unofficial Guide to House, M.D., her primary beat is primetime television. But Barbara writes on an everything from film to politics to technology to all things pop culture and spirituality. She is a contributor to the book called Spiritual Pregnancy (Llewellyn Worldwide, January 2014) and has a story in Riverdale Ave Press' new anthology of zombie romance, Still Hungry for your Love. She is hard at work on what she hopes will be her first published novel.
  • Pablo Horteg

    You didn’t even mention that the show is based on a popular Australian series? Going off the original, the US remake isn’t as intelligent or dark/ironic. They “hammed up” some of the jokes for the US audience and dumbed it down, but Kinnear was great. If they harness more of what made the original great this could be a very successful series. My advice: watch at least 4 episodes before casting judgement, this is not your standard sitcom.

    • http://blogcritics.org/writers/barbara-barnett Barbara Barnett

      You are right, which is why I’ve got some hope for the series. Stay tuned for my review of the second episode, which I fervently hope will fulfill some of the promise.

  • zachlen

    How you caneven compare this to House is ridiculous. This has been one episode compared to years of house. I’m finding this much funnier but not in a juvenile way as most TV shows.. Kinner is simply a charming schmuck. I think it way too smart for American audiences.

  • dodoti

    The guy is stupid and a loser, I will watch for a bit but will become tired real quick if it is just the same ond stupid thing always in debt and always taking cases that make no money, how stupid.

%d bloggers like this: