Home / TV / TV Review: House, M.D. Revisited – “The Socratic Method”

TV Review: House, M.D. Revisited – “The Socratic Method”

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Share on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

The first five episodes of House, M.D.’s first season paint a portrait of its central character as someone who avoids patient contact, dismisses illnesses as trivial matters and patients as annoyances. To Dr. Gregory House (Hugh Laurie), medicine is a series of puzzles and that’s it.

But you get the idea as you watch him actually interacting with his patients that there’s something more there, something unspoken. This image doesn’t quite jibe with his impassioned confrontation with the patient in the pilot episode, or his grave expression and gentleness as he autopsies the infant in “Maternity.” There is the merest suggestion of a deeper compassion—a passionate dedication that goes beyond simply solving the medical mystery du jour. Which brings us to “The Socratic Method,” the sixth episode of season one.

House’s actions in “Socratic Method” seem to be anomalies—things that don’t quite fit—what we know (or assume) about House to that point in the series. But are they anomalies or are they glimpses behind the curtain—clues to the “real” House behind the stony façade?

Lurking in a hospital waiting area, House first hears about the week’s patient, Lucy Palmeiro, as he hides (presumably from Cuddy, who’s paging him) behind a newspaper in a hospital waiting area. Overhearing an ER doctor and Lucy’s teenage son Lucas discuss the case, House’s curiosity is piqued. Noting that Lucy is schizophrenic and has a high blood alcohol content to go along with her DVT (blood clot in her vein), the ER doctor casually dismisses Lucy’s condition, intending to treat the clot and discharge her.

House intervenes, sarcastically calling out the ER doc for making assumptions about Lucy’s condition and looking no further than the circumstantial evidence of her mental condition and the alcohol. Taking her case, House confuses everyone about why a woman with a “bump in her leg” would interest House. Even Wilson is bewildered, comparing House taking this apparently simple case to Picasso painting a fence.

Choosing to deflect rather than discuss why he’s interested in Lucy’s case, House goes into one of his classic rants about the way in which schizophrenics have been mistreated since the days of Socrates (himself a notable schizophrenic, according to House). And then continues to confound everyone by actually going to visit Lucy in her room—to talk with her. How can uber-rational House connect with the irrational Lucy?

Whatever motivates this rare show of attention for a patient, House’s involvement with Lucy and her son goes beyond striving for a diagnosis or proving a less meticulous doctor wrong. House reads to her from a book of Yeats’ poetry; he spends time with Lucas, even sending him off to the cafeteria equipped with his pager and a $20 bill to buy himself lunch when he needs to see Lucy alone. It’s a small act and tiny moment in the series, but significant. How many doctors, much less those with reputations for being jerks, would give a patient’s teenage boy lunch money, never mind his pager?

House listens when Lucas tries to explain his mother’s blood alcohol, insisting he gives it to her as an alternative to the “soul numbing” antipsychotic drug Haldol. And when Lucy ultimately calls social services to have Lucas removed to foster care, House quietly expresses his admiration for her choice. “Good for you,” he says. And understanding that Lucy would make such a self-sacrificing rational decision, House realizes that she can’t really be schizophrenic—there must be an alternative explanation for Lucy’s psych symptoms. And there is. Explaining that each of her doctors has treated and diagnosed her while wearing the blinders of their own sub-specialties, they’ve missed the bigger picture. Only by looking beyond the edges of conventional wisdom is House able to diagnose the rare Wilson’s disease, which has caused all of her symptoms—including the schizophrenic symptoms.

“Socratic Method” begins to get into the heart of how House really thinks and feels about medicine, what he sees as his role in it, and his views on conventional medical practice: dismissive, judgmental, and just plain lazy. Too often doctors are willing to take the simplest explanation without digging too much further. It’s what we later learn (“Three Stories”) is something with which House has personal experience, and it’s a particularly raw nerve. And not only the ER doctor, but Chase and Foreman too, make assumptions about Lucy that cloud their ability to understand the real underlying illness and cause of her symptoms. To Foreman, she’s crazy; to Chase, she’s an alcoholic. There’s no need to look further; send her home. As Cameron remarks after Lucy begins to bleed internally, she would have died had she been kicked to the curb.

Although he never comes out and says it, House seems to view Lucy (and her son) as victims of a dismissive medical establishment. It’s clearly something that hits a nerve within him, and in the early seasons of House, other patients, including Victoria (“Histories”), Clarence (“Acceptance”), and Anica (“Deception”), also seem to interest House for the same reason. Spending time in Lucy’s room, House listens to her. She makes little sense, answering his questions with nonsensical ravings. But, surprisingly, House keeps talking—and listening. “No one believes me,” she says at one point (to no one in particular—she’s barely aware of House’s presence in her room). “I do,” House replies, answering with a seriousness that makes us believe that he does.

House interacts with both Lucy and Lucas in ways to which we’re not normally accustomed. House is only mildly irritated when Lucas “opens up” to House about his guilt over his mother’s illness; he is (seemingly) uncharacteristically tolerant and kind to him. And when in the end Lucas accuses House of having made the call to social services, House doesn’t deny it; collaborating in a lie of omission to protect Lucy from Lucas’ anger should he learn the truth. But is House’s behavior uncharacteristic—or only uncharacteristic of what we know of him early in season one?

What is it about Lucy (and later patients) that causes House to exit his misanthrope’s fortress and “care?” Does House view Lucy and Lucas as “outside the circle” like he is? Different—“freaks” as he will refer to himself in season three—outcasts? Perhaps he relates to them and maybe even their victimhood because of his own experiences. And, they are experiences of which we are completely unaware by “Socratic Method,” only becoming clearer as the seasons pass.

It is in “Socratic Method” that we also begin to see how far House is willing to bend or break the rules on behalf of his patients. When House learns that one of Lucy’s problems is a tumor on her liver, too large to be operable, he decides to artificially shrink it with alcohol—enough to fool the surgeon that it fits within surgical guidelines. Interestingly, Wilson (and the team) support House’s ploy with little dissension even from Foreman. But Cuddy catches wind of what’s about to transpire and confronts House about it (amusingly) in the men’s room, where she is quite comfortable arguing with House about doing the procedure while he uses the facilities just a few feet away. Using an argument he has often used since—that patient care should trump the risk to the doctors’ (and hospital’s) bottom line, House ultimately tells her to do what she thinks is right. The choice is hers: either rat him out to the surgeon or remain silent on the matter and allow House to break the rules (but save Lucy’s life).

Cuddy chooses to support House, which begins to establish (one of the reasons) why she may have hired him in the first place (there are probably many reasons, but that’s for another day and another article). She knows that House breaks the rules, twists protocol and ignores medical ethics half the time, but she also knows that he’s effective when other doctors are not. She is making a judgment that there is value to a physician like House and she is fortunate to have him on her staff, able to advocate in ways she, as the dean, is unable.

There is much else that makes “Socratic Method” classic House, M.D., and I would absolutely call “Socratic Method” a must-see episode for anyone new to the series. It’s rich and more complex than it seems on its surface; it has great dialogue and humor, allows us to listen to House (and Hugh Laurie, of course) play classical piano, and propels House’s story forward, revealing him in ways yet unseen to this point in the series.

Powered by

About Barbara Barnett

Barbara Barnett is Publisher/Executive Editor of Blogcritics, (blogcritics.org). Her Bram Stoker Award-nominated novel, called "Anne Rice meets Michael Crichton," The Apothecary's Curse The Apothecary's Curse is now out from Pyr, an imprint of Prometheus Books. Her book on the TV series House, M.D., Chasing Zebras is a quintessential guide to the themes, characters and episodes of the hit show. Barnett is an accomplished speaker, an annual favorite at MENSA's HalloWEEM convention, where she has spoken to standing room crowds on subjects as diverse as "The Byronic Hero in Pop Culture," "The Many Faces of Sherlock Holmes," "The Hidden History of Science Fiction," and "Our Passion for Disaster (Movies)."
  • Flo

    Okay @RobF, It’s seems I totally misunderstood your first post. I agree with you that a great episode of “House” is one which combine all the different elements (the personal & professional stuffs).
    House was less focused on the cases this year so the medical aspect was less interesting for the most part.

    Also, I believe this writing was supposed to match House’s struggle to find a balance in his life again with the changes he’s made and his career. This season House was more focused on his change of life and trying to stay off the drug than on his job.
    You’re right, this parallel wasn’t always done well, that’s an understatement.
    However, now that he got the girl and chose to remain off the drugs (therefore embracing his change of life), he has no reason to be not focused on his cases, so….I have hope (which is for sissies I know) 🙂

    I guess it’s wait and see, but the writing is still really good, I personally still believe they know what they’re doing.

    @Barbara, I have to re-watch season 6 but I found it not as good as the fifth, less cohesive somehow. Nevertheless, I believe it too be a very strong one and not as bad as a lot of people think. Looking forward to your article on this 🙂

  • I agree with you RobF in many respects. I found season six much more satisfying, cohesive and in general much better re-watching it without the constant breaks (by commercials and hiatuses).

    There were definitely parts of season six with which I wasn’t very happy; those were episodes that had House verging on either too much of an ass or out of character. I’ll be doing a retrospective of season seven upcoming before the new season begins.

  • RobF

    Of course I want personal growth of the characters in the show, especially after several seasons. The problem is when every episode becomes obviously a step (or a step back) in the personal growth of House, to the exclusion of all else.

    The best episodes of the first three seasons were those that highlighted a facet of House’s personality or some startling behaviour that turned out to be natural to him. What made the great episodes great was not simply House’s actions, but the richness of the other characters, including the patients. With a few exceptions this season (especially James Earl Jones and David Strathairn), the patients tended to be caricatures that were plainly nothing more than a parallel or harmonic of the main House-centric story.

    The show is best when it is looking at the dilemmas that naturally come from a character’s ethics, as in DNR when House wouldn’t honour a patient’s desire to die because he thought the patient’s decision had been made with faulty information. Or in Known Unknowns, when Wilson was ready to throw away his career because he was tired of lying about euthanasia, but House stepped in to save him.

    We need all the growth or the series becomes stale. We need the soap opera because relationships are a big part of the life of any character. But those things are not what made this series special, and the writers need to remember that.

  • Flo

    @RobF Why are you watching a show called “House MD” if you don’t want any personal growth to this character?
    It is only natural that the main character (after which the show is called) evolves & that the writers explores his life and personality through and through in every way possible.

    Lucy was great, and yes in season 6, House was less focus on the cases which was too bad. I agree with this, even if, admittedly, he had other things to think about.

    However, I do expect House to be explore further and I do expect some personal growth again. I trust the writers to make the whole House/Cuddy thing a way to show another layer to this great character and not making this a soap. They didn’t fail us so far in this area.

  • RobF

    Great review, Barbara! It makes me hope that Season 7 has episodes like the Socratic Method, and not so much House/Cuddy soap opera, nor even House soul-searching and personal growth.

    I want patient stories with real people that pull something out of House like Lucy did; too often in Season 6 the patient was just a cipher whose story was only there as a parallel to House’s internal drama.

  • ruthinor

    Some new promos for season 7. You have to look very closely at # 1. It goes by so quickly it’s hard to register everything. The second one is terrific, and leads one to believe that Wilson has been unaware of what’s been going on between House and Cuddy.

  • Flo

    “The Socratic Method” is on of the best episode of the entire show! Like you said Barbara, it is a must see. Thanks for the great review.
    I agree wholeheartedly that this episode is very important for the character constrcution of House. We are able to see another new side of him, new at this point.

    In retrospect, it is also great to see how Foreman and Chase have grown as men and doctor, especially Chase.

    I also agree with Blacktop. Great comment about the characters and the show. It is really coherent!

  • blacktop

    Thanks for this interesting refresher course in early “House.” One thing I found so interesting was not the fact that Foreman and Chase dismissed Lucy, but the way that they did it. Foreman called her crazy and Chase labelled her an alcoholic. These two responses reflect what we later learn about their own troubled family history: Foreman’s mother has dementia and ultimately dies having completly forgotten her son. Chase’s mother was an alcoholic abandoned by a neglectful husband.

    It seems to me that David Shore had worked out in his head the entire trajectory of “House” from as early as the pilot episode. Many important story lines, including the abiding attraction between House and Cuddy, were established in these earliest episodes. The foundation for this series was tightly constructed and carefully established from the beginning.

  • Rose

    The Socratic Method is interesting to me because of the immense amount of detail it gives us on Chase’s background, using a case that mirrors him and his relationship with his mother. The subtlety of the foreshadowing the show used to go into back then is one of the things I miss most about the early series.

  • Buds

    Hey BB, great article as usual.

    I was just thinking about one other possible cause for House taking on the case. In Lucy’s case she had a blood clot in her calf which got stuck in her lungs. House, sort of similarly, had a blood clot stuck in his thigh which caused his infarction, because it wasn’t diagnosed properly. Maybe he felt he needed to make sure that there was nothing else wrong in her case before “kicking her to the curb,” which actually was true.

  • Anne D.

    It is commentary like this one that really amplifies the already immense impact of the House television series–a series that inspires the type of thought-provoking discussion and reflections that I believe represent the best of what television has to offer.

    I have seen almost every episode of House at least once and yet as I read this commentary, I am poised to watch it again to view it from yet another cogent viewpoint that amply draws attention to the characteristic prism that is an episode of House–a fitting tribute to a series that has yet to cease entertaining, challenging, and enlightening its viewers.