I’ve written the occasional poem, but under no circumstances would I ever consider myself a poet. There’s a world of difference between writing a poem and being a poet. However, trying to articulate exactly what separates poets from the rest of us, from other writers even, is not the easiest thing in the world either. In her latest book, With Robert Lowell and His Circle, published by the University Press of New England (UPNE), poet and author Kathleen Spivack, has managed to pull the veil back on this mystery through her look back on her years with the great 20th century American poet Robert Lowell.
In 1959 Spivack received a bursary to study with Lowell in Boston in lieu of her senior year at university. Through the process of recounting her days as first his student and then friend and confidant she not only paints a picture of this great, and greatly disturbed artist, but introduces us to the other brilliant minds she came in contact with as a result of her relationship with Lowell. From her fellow classmates in that first year’s seminar, Anne Sexton and Sylvia Plath, to other lessor known but equally gifted artists, each of them are lovingly remembered as both individuals and as poets.
Initially we see these great figures through the eyes of the nervous and insecure student who finds herself alone in a strange and cold city. Boston, Harvard University, Boston University, and New England are characters of equal, if not greater, significance than many of the individuals she meets. Intimidating, cold, rigidly bound by its conservative class structure and rabidly misogynist attitudes (as late as the 1980s Harvard University would boast it would rather face law suits than give equal opportunities to women), the atmosphere wasn’t one guaranteed to set a young woman at ease. When combined with showing up in Boston only to find her teacher “unavailable” due to having suffered a nervous breakdown, it didn’t make for a very auspicious start to her dreams of being a poet.
Even when classes finally start she finds herself at sea. Lowell isn’t what any of us would call a typical teacher. Our initial impression is of someone who is as far removed from reality as we can imagine. He obsesses about the meaning of a single line in a poem asking “What does it mean?” over and over again. However, it appears he’s holding a conversation with himself as almost none of his students dare to interject. He also appears to be incredibly judgemental, asking whether some poet is “major or minor” with the answer being based on criteria nobody else is quite able to fathom. Imagine being a young and almost painfully shy student even daring to bring her own work to this class and having it put through this type of analyses in front of you.
However, Lowell, for all his eccentricities, does take her in hand and introduces her to those he thinks will be of help to her. In this manner Spivack is brought into the circle of poets who are both his students and associates. Through her meetings with Sexton, Plath and other female poets we are introduced to the horrors societal pressure can wrack upon a creative woman. The picture Spivack draws makes it clear how much the New England disdain, and especially Harvard University’s, for women led to their downfall. Trying to conform to the dutiful housewife image expected of them by the society they found themselves in must have been bad enough. Compounding this was the indignity of seeing men of no greater talent receiving the recognition denied them through publication and acceptance. This must have been an incredibly bitter pill for them to swallow. Maybe both Plath and Sexton would have taken their own lives in the end anyway – Sexton seems to have had a fascination with suicide – but the circumstances they found themselves in couldn’t have helped.
Of course, it wasn’t just the women who suffered. As we watch Spivack get to know Lowell over the course of the years, from 1959 until his death in 1977 from a sudden heart attack, we learn the breakdown he was suffering from when she first arrived wasn’t an isolated incident. A manic-depressive, Lowell was in and out of institutions for most of the time Spivack knew him. Learning to recognize the symptoms of an approaching breakdown she would deliberately start to distance herself from him when they started to manifest. His behaviour, erratic at the best of times, during these build ups made him unbearable for her to be around. Ironically, once he was committed, her house was one of the few places considered safe enough for him to visit on day release.
If Lowell was obsessive in his analysis of others work, it was nothing compared to the rigours he subjected his own writing. Spivack tells of knowing of upwards of 200 drafts existing in the case of certain poems. Even after a poem’s publication Lowell would continue with his revisions, searching for the absolutely perfect word and line. Yet it wasn’t necessarily the search for perfection that was so harmful. Like his contemporaries among the women poets, the need to conform to society’s expectations of gender played havoc on Lowell and other male poets of Spivack’s acquaintance. Men were supposed to be hard drinking, stoical and, above all, unemotional beings who followed manly pursuits like hunting and definitely didn’t do anything so effete as become poets.
While the men might have had the support of the academic establishment and those behind the scene in the literary world, they were still expected to be “men”. Is it any wonder Alan Ginsberg wrote “I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness” in his great poem Howl? Men and women poets, people with minds beautifully tuned to the rhythms of the universe like nobody else, were slowly driven mad by having live almost dual lives. Those among them who were homosexual suffered even more, but it was just as bad for the straights as well. Poets were all in the closet as they were forced to hide sensitive natures or steal seconds in which to write the poetry that allowed them feel alive.
Spivack was blessed, and is wonderfully honest about admitting this, with being in the right place at the right time. Initially I was rather disconcerted by the fact the book seemed more autobiographical than about those whom the title suggests its about. However, as the book progresses and we see how the lives of these amazing poets come to interweave with her own, I began to appreciate her decision to take this approach. Many of the figures in this book are known to us only through poems in anthologies or through dry academic biographies. Meeting them through Spivack’s memories not only lifts them out of the books and off the page, it turns them into people of flesh and blood.
It also has the wonderful effect of breathing life into their poetry. After reading about the sweat and blood they would pour into each of their creations, I want to go back and read their work again. For when I do, they won’t just be words on a page anymore written by some anonymous person whom I’m supposed to admire because history tells me to, they’ll be poems by a real person. Somebody whose kitchen I’ve sat in, to whom I listened as they agonized over whether a line or even a word was right, and who laughed and cried like any of us, but then had the bravery to attempt to put those feelings down on paper.
Spivack does the extraordinary in making the poets in her book both ordinary and special at the same time. Ordinary, in the fact they are her friends whom she sees on a regular basis during the 1960s and 1970s, and special for the legacy of brilliance they have left for us. Lowell, who mentored Spivack and other writers, suffered and struggled to overcome the antipathy the world around them had towards his passion not only managed to produce works of genius but take others in hand and help them fulfill their potential.
Spviack’s portrayal of Lowell in particular, but the others as well, is both heartfelt and honest. Unlike an “official biographer” who is boringly objective in their depictions, she has no qualms about letting her affection for her subjects shine through or letting us know how much she admired somebody. However, she’s not blind to their faults either and is unstinting in her honesty when listing them. At the same time she doesn’t try to hide the fact these are her impressions of these people. She does give us indications of other people’s impressions of them, Lowell especially, by including quotes from her contemporaries at the end of almost every chapter which address an aspect of their character.
While this book is by no means a definitive study of the work and lives of the poets you’ll meet within its pages, it provides an even far more valuable service. It allows us the chance to look behind their reputations and the myths that have grown up around them to see them as the complex and interesting people they were. This book is probably the best introduction to the world of American poetry in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s you’re liable to read.