Dan Schneider is the founder and webmaster of Cosmoetica: the best in poetica.
--
Film critic Roger Ebert calls Dan Schneider 'a considerable critic....'' that Dan Schneider (in regards to Ebert's writings) 'may well be correct in some aspects. What his analysis gives me is a renewed respect and curiosity about his own work....'; he states, 'Dan Schneider is observant, smart, and makes every effort to be fair.' He states, 'I conclude he is more analytical and less visceral that I am,' Ebert ends his praise, stating, 'What is remarkable about these many words is that Schneider keeps an open mind, approaches each film afresh, and doesn't always repeat the same judgments. An ideal critic tries to start over again with every review.' -12/9/09, from 'Who do you read? Good Roger or Bad Roger?', by Roger Ebert
--
The Dan Schneider Interviews: The Most Widely Read Interview Series in Internet History
Member of the Internet Film Critic Society (IFCS)
Criterion Collection and Classic DVD Examiner
--
www.Cosmoetica.com
Cosmoetica: The Best In Poetica
www.Cosmoetica.com/Cinemension.htm
Cinemension: Film's Extra Dimension
Subscribe to writer's RSS
Harryhausen's classic wallows in camp, but emerges unscathed.
Louis Malle's Holocaust film scores some points, but strikes out as well.
Another Theo Angelopoulos masterpiece.
Theo Angelopoulos delivers a masterpiece, old school.
Bergman's odd departure from the self leaves something out.
This too fawning documentary could have taken a cue from a real master of the documentary, like Errol Morris.
Paul Schrader's seminal film theory book proves that mastering one sort of writing means little in other sorts.
Theo Angelopoulos delivers a masterpiece that few Americans can bear.
An indie film take on the classic Victorian novella misses the mark, but not by much.
Krzystof Kieslowski's early treatise on film hints at future greatness.
BC Writer of the Week