Today on Blogcritics
Home » Film » WCW Is Back And Its New Name Is TNA

WCW Is Back And Its New Name Is TNA

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Earlier this month, something happened in the world of professional wrestling that hasn't been seen in something like a decade: Two competing wrestling companies actually went head-to-head with their television programming on a Monday night.

For one night in January 2010, the "Monday Night Wars" of the 1990's were back. But wait — it gets even better. Between the two Monday night wrestling shows — WWE's Monday Night Raw and TNA's Impact — the names involved read like some kind of sports entertainment time warp.

TNA's three-hour extravaganza not only marked the return of Hulk Hogan, but also names like Ric Flair, Eric Bischoff, Kevin Nash, Scott Hall, Sean "X-Pac" Waltman, and the Nasty Boys.

Raw countered with the return of Bret "Hitman" Hart, who hasn't been seen in a WWE ring since Vince McMahon screwed him out of the world championship twelve years ago in a rare, real-life incident fans still refer to as the "Montreal Screwjob." It has long since gone on to become the stuff of legend among those who follow the soap opera for men that is pro wrestling. Most insiders also believe Hart's return will lead to a scripted final chapter to the "Montreal Screwjob" with McMahon which will play out at this year's Wrestlemania pay-per-view.

What makes all of this most interesting, however, is that if you blinked for a second — not to mention if you overlooked the fact that guys like Scott Hall look quite a bit worse for their wear these days — you'd almost swear it was the mid-nineties again.

For those unfamiliar, perhaps a brief history lesson is in order here.

During the '90's, pro-wrestling enjoyed a brief period of unprecedented mainstream success, driven mostly by the very heated and intense competition between the two primary national wrestling promotions.

Vince McMahon's World Wrestling Federation (now WWE) had been there before in the eighties with stars like Hulk Hogan and Randy "Macho Man" Savage. But when Hogan defected to Ted Turner's rival World Championship Wrestling (WCW) — lured away by a lighter schedule and a fatter paycheck — other WWF stars, including Savage, Rowdy Roddy Piper, Ultimate Warrior, Hall, Nash, and Waltman soon followed suit.

Even Bret Hart eventually wound up in WCW, which contributed in more ways than one to the skullduggery which took place at the "Montreal Screwjob." But that's another story…

Long story short, this led Eric Bischoff, who was then running WCW for Turner, to create Monday Nitro, which ran head to head on Monday nights with WWF's Raw, becoming the biggest pain in Vince McMahon's ass for most of the nineties. The Monday Night Wars were born.

For the first several years of the war, WCW's Nitro handed the WWE's ass to them on a platter, thanks in large part to a brilliant storyline involving the renegade NWO (New World Order), a faction of heels ("bad guys") headed by Hogan, Hall and Nash. In the heavily scripted world of wrestling, this angle was red hot because it created the illusion that actual WWE guys were invading WCW. Bischoff, for his part, did nothing to discourage this distortion of reality. As wrestling stories go, this stuff was pure gold.

While WWE did take a beating for awhile, this also gave McMahon time to regroup, and to develop new stars like WCW cast-off Steve Austin and second-generation wrestler Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson. When the NWO story went on a few years past its shelf life and grew stale, and when Austin's character in particular caught on big-time with the anti-authoritarian, beer-swilling "Stone Cold" persona, WWE eventually regained its place as the top dog in the Monday Night Wars.

The winner in all this of course was the fans. The Monday Night Wars and all the heated competition they fostered meant both companies fighting tooth and nail to outdo each other every Monday — which resulted in some of the best wrestling shows ever seen on TV. It's hard to believe today, but in the nineties the two companies combined for double-digit ratings and often outdrew Monday Night Football — especially among younger viewers. Wrestling was actually that hot.

The question now is, can that type of lightning strike twice?

With no real competition since WWE eventually bought WCW for pennies on the dollar once the war had clearly been won — Vince McMahon's Monday Night Raw product has largely coasted for the past ten years. They have developed some new stars — most notably John Cena — but many feel the product has become stale, and has otherwise lost its once cutting edge.

However, some real competition could be just the thing to shake things up again. With Hogan's return, interest in Spike's TNA (Total Nonstop Action) is higher than it has probably ever been, and a second round of head-to-head Monday Night Wrestling has been confirmed for March 1st. There are also rumors of a permanent Monday night slot for TNA if they can deliver a good rating.

Could a return of the Monday Night Wars be in the making?

If so, TNA is going to need to do several things. A show packed with older stars like Hogan, Flair, Nash, etc., is sure to pop some decent ratings in the short term. The novelty and nostalgia factors alone make that a given. But in order to sustain that momentum, TNA is also going to need to develop compelling new stories, and more importantly, groom talented and young new stars.

The three-hour TNA show earlier this month was a lot of fun to watch, to be sure. But far too often, it also resembled the train wreck that was WCW in its dying days.

The storylines —  largely scripted by former WWE and WCW writer Vince Russo — were often hard to follow. Characters like Hogan and Bischoff also really blurred the lines between good and evil. One minute, Hogan is the guy who is there to save the company, and the next Bischoff's character, who is paired with Hulk, is firing fan-favorite Mick Foley and portraying himself as the same sniveling little shit he did in WCW. Good guys? Bad guys? Beats the hell out of me.

In wrestling, the lines between babyface and heel must always be clearly defined. The one thing you don't want to do is confuse who it is the fans are supposed to be cheering for and booing against. TNA is going to need to sharpen these stories, and define the characters better if they are going to succeed long term.

The other problem right now with TNA is that the older stars — many of whom are wrestling long past their expiration date (and look it) — threaten to overshadow the many young talents TNA will need to develop in order to compete with WWE. Right now, the promotion really just looks like the old WCW with a new name.

In addition to Hogan, Bischoff, Flair, Waltman, Hall and Nash — guys like the Nasty Boys, Jeff Jarrett (who helped start the company with his father), Sting, and Scott Steiner also have spots on the roster. WWE and ECW castoffs like Team 3D (the former Dudley Boys), Jeff Hardy (who arrives following a recent drug-related arrest), and even Kurt Angle (with a history of neck problems) complete the very familiar looking locker room there.

These faces should give TNA a short-term ratings bump for sure once the fans find them. But eventually, younger fans in particular are going to realize that Hogan and Flair are old enough to be their grandfathers.

The younger, hipper stars of WWE like Cena, Batista, Randy Orton and Rey Mysterio already have devoted followings not unlike the Rock and Austin once did in the nineties. WWE is also busy developing the next generation of talent with people like C.M. Punk, The Miz, John Morrison, Kofi Kingston, and current champion Sheamus. In order to succeed, TNA will need to do the same.

The good news there is that TNA has plenty of potential new stars in people like Samoa Joe, Christopher Daniels, and A.J. Styles. While TNA fans are already familiar with these names, the larger audience still doesn't know them. What TNA does with these talents is crucial. So far, however, the signs are a mixed bag.

Styles is their current champion, but has also been given a character makeover as a heel who has been paired with Ric Flair. While Flair is probably the best teacher a young guy like Styles could have as far as nurturing the total wrestling package of in-ring skills and the ability to talk smack on a mike — Styles should also be given the chance to develop into an original character on his own. Right now, they seem to be fashioning him as a Flair clone.

Meanwhile, Christopher Daniels, who has had many great yet under-watched matches with Styles and others, appears to be moving down the card. I haven't seen much of Samoa Joe — an all too rare combination of size and skill in the wrestling game — at all since Hogan and Bischoff arrived.

I want to see TNA succeed. Not because I favor them over WWE, but because the return of a real competitor means that the quality of the product can only get better. But these are disturbing signs, especially given the history of Hogan and Bischoff's last run at the top together in WCW.

Hopefully, they will work out the kinks and TNA will emerge as a legitimate player in a new Monday Night Wars. This would be nothing but good news for wrestling fans.

Bur for the present, WCW appears to be back and its new name is TNA.

Powered by

About Glen Boyd

Glen Boyd is the author of Neil Young FAQ, released in May 2012 by Backbeat Books/Hal Leonard Publishing. He is a former BC Music Editor and current contributor, whose work has also appeared in SPIN, The Rocket, The Source and other publications. You can read more of Glen's work at The Rockologist, and at the official Neil Young FAQ site. Follow Glen on Twitter and on Facebook.
  • http://www.filmcalamity.com Jonathan Sullivan

    WWE has botched the Bret Hart storyline to the point of where I don’t even care about it anymore. TNA is still a mess of crazy booking and bringing in stars like The Nasty Boys and turning AJ into the new Nature Boy is not helping, but this past Thursday’s show was actually pretty good compared to 2009 as a whole. Jury’s out.

    I was a diehard WCW fan from 1992 until the final Nitro in 2001 and it scares me how much TNA looks like it’s going down the same road.

  • http://theglenblog.blogspot.com Glen Boyd

    I’m with you Jon. It doesn’t surprise me that WWE is botching the can’t miss Bret Hart storyline so far…they had a similarly can’t miss WCW Invasion angle handed to them ten years ago and botched it on the very first night (I was there at the Tacoma Dome that night). Since then they’ve pretty ruined much ECW, after one initial great PPV (the first One Night Stand).

    As for TNA…I think it could work if they did it right, but so far it’s so convoluted I can’t even figure out who is who and what is what in terms of storyline and characters. Hogan and Bischoff so far look like a business-as-usual, prop up our friends, give minor pushes to a select few others, and bury the rest regime, and Russo seems to be literally be flying by the seat of his pants in terms of booking and storylines.

    I have hopes this can revive wrestling, but I can assure you I’m not holding my breath.

    -Glen

  • Will

    How can something be botched after ONE week?

  • Nick

    “How can something be botched after ONE week?”

    Good question,….easy answer:

    Just watch TNA & WWE and you’ll understand.

  • http://theglenblog.blogspot.com Glen Boyd

    I’m willing to give them both a chance. I’m just not very encouraged by what I’ve seen thus far.

    This Monday’s Raw show has Hart back, and hopefully will advance that storyline. As for TNA, I’d just like to see the Hogan and Bischoff characters better defined one way for the other. Hogan’s dressed in NWO black and his entrance music is very NWO’ish and Bischoff is as smarmy as ever — yet I still get this weird feeling they are supposed to be babyfaces, which to me makes no sense.

    Hopefully the coming weeks will reveal a better laid out story. We’ll see…

    By the way, the Observer just linked this article. So if either Dave or Bryan are reading, thanx guys!

    -Glen

  • http://theglenblog.blogspot.com Glen Boyd

    The “Orlando Screwjob” deal with Styles, Flair, and Hebner (!) was pretty hilarious though…at least in a stupid, this could only happen in wrestling sort of way anyway.

    -Glen

  • Nick

    “By the way, the Observer just linked this article. So if either Dave or Bryan are reading, thanx guys!”

    Yep, this is how I found this! :)

    “Bur for the present, WCW appears to be back and its new name is TNA.”

    Yep, and as long as Russo has anything to do with the booking in any shape or form AND as long as Hogan & Eric have ANY say, it will never live up to its potential.

    I don’t mind them (Hogan & Eric) not being clear cut heels or faces (50-60 % of workers should be “‘tweeners” anyways with the remaining roster split into true faces and heels…allows for more variety in the match ups and is not ‘stuck in the past super hero vs super villian’ booking,) but they CANNOT be on compleate opposite sides of the spectrumpromo wise when they are both on camera at the same time.

  • Ewan

    TNA seems to be testing the waters to see how fans react to Hogan/Eric and The Band first before also defining their heel/face status in a climax. This is fine with me since it builds suspense as to how everything will pan out with these legendary key players. They shouldn’t spoil this like the chickenheaded WWE did with the wcw/ecw Invasion situation.

  • judith hedger

    Why is Kurt Angle and Mick Foley on T N A Wrestling last week?

  • http://theglenblog.blogspot.com Glen Boyd

    They’ve both been with TNA for awhile now Judith.

    -Glen