Wolfgang Peterson's Troy

Author: JostonPublished: May 19, 2004 at 11:24 am 2 comments

If you could measure a woman's beauty according shipbuilding, where drop dead gorgeous equals one thousand warships and ugly is a canoe, then the woman who plays the mythical Helen of Troy in the new Wolfgang Peterson film Troy, Diane Kruger, is probably worth something with an outboard motor, but no more. The arch of her eyebrows is considerably more masculine than that of Patroclus, the not at all gay "cousin" of Brad Pitt's Achilles. (Not that there's anything wrong with that.) But Helen's beauty, or lack thereof, is only one of the many things wrong with this movie.

As far a summer blockbuster action goes, you will mostly get your money's worth. Director Wolfgang Peterson does a great job with the one to one combat. The final showdown between Hector and Achilles is beautifully choreographed. I've never seen spears and short swords handled better. The big set pieces with a cast of thousands, however, are handled with less skill. Impressive as it is to see an army of 50,000 Greeks laying siege to a city, the action is somewhat confusing to watch. At times, it is just too much helmet for eye to make sense of. Nevertheless, Troy serves up good battles. But you don't remake Homer's Iliad, one of the cornerstones of Western culture, because you want more of the blood sport that made Conan the Barbarian so much fun. There has to be more. And that's where the movie falls apart. Whenever the movie leaves the field of combat, the drama is painfully thin and contrived with too many scenes of ACTING, master thespian ACTING. Entire scenes collapse under the weight of their own ponderous seriousness.

I don't want to beat up on the actors too badly, because I've seen many of them do wonderful things in other movies, and they are certainly selling the material here for all it's worth. The culprit is the script by David Benioff. He has taken the major plot arch of the Iliad, the wrath of Achilles and his grudge match with Hector, but unwisely ditched the unity of time and setting that made the Iliad a coherent work.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Anna Farley

    May 25, 2004 at 8:39 am

    Ancient Greek society was androcentric in the extreme. Petersen actually captures this in Troy. Whether he means to or not is difficult to determine. The women are secondary to the doings of the male characters. Brad was simply dishing up bits of all his previous performances, in making Achilles such a scenery-chewing psychotic. I was royally entertained by Troy - having done a bit of study of the Ancient Greeks, I thought it was very much in the spirit of storytelling, at which they excelled. But, hey, so was Kevin Sorbo's Hercules. Troy was far less cringe-inducing. The great big screen really helps with the epics. People should let themselves be entertained. There were enough iconic moments for those who have some familiarity with the thing, but probably not enough for the purist. It was really interesting to see the scene between old Peter O'Toole and Achilles, after remembering his screen idol performance in the almost equally homoerotic Laurence of Arabia. Kind of puts the pressure on Brad to stay in the business. Eric Bana was good as Hector - loved Orlando's archery scene, but missed his Legolas locks...

  • 2 - mitch

    Jun 10, 2004 at 10:53 pm

    why call the movie troy

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 11, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs