Whoa - you think I've been slamming TV, especially "reality" TV, hard? Check out this preview of tonight's programming by Robert Bianco in USA Today:
- Even on a medium prone to the tawdry, seldom have we seen a seamier battle than tonight's competition between CBS' Victoria's Secret Fashion Show and ABC's The Bachelor (both 9 ET/PT). For anyone out to prove that TV is on some wild hormonal binge, it's a confluence made in heaven. Or elsewhere.
Still, hats (or shirts) off to CBS for being upfront about what it's doing. Sure, there's a ''fashion show'' in the Victoria's Secret special, but everyone knows it's not the fashions that matter. It's what's barely covered underneath. The network is selling sex and selling it hard, from the King of Queens' promo-jokes about touching yourself to the supermodel crossovers on Yes, Dear. Because getting someone to say ''yes'' is what Victoria's Secret is all about.
I agree with Bianco here: not much wrong with a little traditional T&A when it's not being sold as anything else, especially when the T&A in question are the hottest models in the world. And by "hot" I am not just talking about appearance: appearance is a given at this level, but what separates the supermodels from the also-rans is attitude, carriage, personality conveyed wordlessly. At this level we are talking about something akin to stylized "art," and the insurmountable distance - literal and pyschological - between the models and the world is what distinguishes a "display" such as this from the lubricious exchange of bodily fluids on display in shows such as The Bachelor - ick, ick, triple ick.
- Young women are hopping into hot-tub three-ways on Real World and baring their breasts for the cameras on countless spring break specials. Compared to that, the look-but-don't-touch Secret is practically Victorian.
Article comments