I also didn’t think Kate’s fate showed any progression on Dean’s part from the Amy storyline last year. Letting Kate go was consistent with letting Amy’s son go. Neither had killed yet, therefore by Dean’s code he has no sanction to kill them and he didn’t want to kill them. Come to that, he didn’t want to kill Amy. He just accepted the need. Again, Dean is not Dexter. What is surprising about the Kate situation is that Dean and Sam are so easily on the same page. If Thompson goes to the trouble of setting up a decision like this, to fit with the current arc, Sam and Dean should have had different perspectives they had trouble communicating to the other one. Otherwise, why bother setting it up?
Obviously, the episode was a bust for me. I felt I wasted an hour where I learned nothing new about Sam and Dean, was not entertained by the case and not interested in the new lead characters. I think putting this episode in at this stage of the season was a big mistake. Supernatural has a great deal of momentum built from the intriguing Purgatory set up in last year’s finale and the added energy of the new night with a hit lead-in. Last night’s episode is not going to hook potential new viewers into the Winchesters’ story. And that’s a shame.
.jpg?t=20130517094513)
Article comments
1 - skoobie79
What a fantastic, detailed review! Hit all the nails on their heads - the film format, the lazy writing, that lame Wincest joke, the zero emotional punch of either Sam & Dean's story, or the 3 students'. I cannot agree more with you about looking at the clock for it to end (never before in my seven year history with SPN since ep 1), and I lost that battle and bailed after about 20 min.
I'm still reeling from the shock of disliking an SPN ep so viscerally. Part of it was my motion sickness - the found footage business was terribly exaggerated, even the cheapest cellphone cameras are not jerky like this now, but mostly it was the atrocious storytelling and the lacklustre cast that made this just a shabby home video. A total waste of the momentum built up this season.
2 - Gerry
Hi Skoobie, thanks for your comment. I'm reeling myself from how much I disliked the episode. I've always liked the experimental episodes. As I think over the ep, I think one problem is it is basically an episode of "Being Human" made with generic actors rather than an episode of Supernatural. Robbie Robertson has to figure out how to push the boundaries while still staying in Supernatural's world.
3 - Emma
the episode was written by Robbie Thompson, not Robbie Robertson, you may want to change that in your review.
4 - Judy
Totally agree. First time in 7+ years I turned off an episode after 25 minutes. Hated the filming hated the other characters lol. But hey I figure there's always one I won't like.
5 - Gerry
Emma, you are so right! Aack--I'll get right on that.
6 - El Bicho
writer's name has been corrected
7 - Gerry
Thank you!
8 - Nate
Wow, first review of yours I have read, and I disagree with everything you said. I thought this was an excellent hour of television. Supernatural does "out of the box" episodes so well. I will provide my more detailed comments later, but I could not disagree more with this review.
9 - Gerry
Hi Nate, free to disagree--I love discussion! We can already find some common ground in that I agree that Supernatural usually does out of the box really well. Just not this time. (-:
10 - Maggiemae
Utterly awful and absurdly borung
11 - Nita
This is the worst Supernatural episode ever. Boring, boring, boring. For a few minutes I thought that perhaps the original Bitten had got destroyed by mistake and at the last minute the Jeremy Carver rustled up something to fill in the time slot. I thought, how can the other team members be okay with this? Surely they should have worked overtime to fix the problem, and re-shoot the original? Anyway my disbelief turned to contempt. That is what I feel towards these makers now.
12 - Michael Pendragon
IMHO last week's Heartache was one of the worst Supernatural episodes ever. Bitten, otoh, was a masterpiece.
Bitten captured the essence of what Supernatural is about (when it's at its best): the supernatural. The college kids seemed real, their gradual awakening to the fact that Mike had become a werewolf was real. And their reaction to it was tragic in the truest sense of the word.
Heartache, otoh, threw all believability out the window. One of the organ-recipient-monsters actually paused in mid-punch to introduce himself to Dean ("I'm the guy from Phoenix you were looking for"). And he had no way of knowing that Dean had been looking for him. Then he and the chubby jogger-recipient-monster held Dean down while Randa straddled him cowgirl style ... and told him her life story in monologue. And if that weren't bad enough, all three of the organ-recipient-monsters were blindly ignoring the 250 lb moose in the room!
And let's not even get into the campy silliness of the concept of an auction attended by gods, angels, and demons the week before that.
The story of Bitten appears to foreshadow the coming episodes and the role that Benny will play in them. Dean allowed Kate to go free just as he helped Benny to escape from Purgatory (both contingent on their not becoming killers).
And it brings up some very thorny issues: Kate hasn't killed yet ... at least not anyone who was human. Kate's killing a werewolf would make her no different from a hunter. A good hunter.
Sam and Dean, otoh, haven't always been good hunters (good as in doing what is right). They've killed people. Intentionally. As collateral damage to serve their own ends. In What's Up Tiger Mommy? they murdered three demon-possessed humans on the grounds that exorcising the demons from them would have allowed the demons to report to Crowley.
And that's just one example of many.
Have Sam and Dean become more monstrous than some monsters (like Kate)?
Here's hoping that Supernatural is moving to more realistic, thought-provoking episodes like last night's and as far away as possible from the joking, campy, monologuing monsters of episodes 8.2 and 8.3.
13 - username
I think there was a meaning behind this form of storytelling. It allowed us a better glimpse into how innocent people can get turned into monsters. I think Dean's time with Benny showed him that not all monsters were bad. That most didn't ask to become monsters. So when Dean chooses to not chase after the girl in the end, it shows a shift in his perspective, that he can sympathize better now, unlike when he killed the kitsune. Overall, I think this episode tried to show a civilian's story about becoming a monster on a much more personal level, and tried to get us to sympathize with the other parts of the supernatural world that aren't as highlighted in the show. It had to take the whole episode to get us to sympathize with the characters, so that when Dean chooses to let the girl go, we can somehow relate to his decision (after becoming buds with a vampire). He's not about to hunt a monster that hasn't harmed anyone innocent. I think maybe somehow the college kids story ' is somehow symbolic of Dean and Sam's supernatural world, or may be foreshadowing something (whether symbolically or what) in the future.
14 - aurens66
Thanks for the great review, I have to agree with you here, a non Sam and Dean centric episode can work if it is writing that shows us another side of the characters or relates to the overall story arc. I thought perhaps they might go with 'Sam and Dean as the enemy/monsters, but this theme was never developed. The 'kids' were not very remarkable, their love triangle was tepid and their acting towards the end was cringeworthy. I have to say, a few seconds of Benny and Dean in the impala in the teaser for next week was more enjoyable than this hour of filler.
15 - Gerry
Hi Michael, username and aurens66--thank you all for your thoughtful comments! Supernatural is a layered show, so it's not surprising there are many viewpoints. Discussion about them is always welcome.
Michael, I don't disagree that Heartless had some plot issues. In my review, I said it was a pedestrian MOTW plot elevated by Jensen's directing (which I thought was excellent) and the brother moments, which worked very well for me. To me the essence of Supernatural is the brothers' journey, showing the human cost of a heroic narrative. Sam and Dean have had to accept collateral damage in their quest to save the larger community. What keeps them sympathetic is their own loved ones are part of that collateral damage. They may save the world, but they can't save anyone they love. And yet they keep on going.
With that in mind, I didn't find Kate to be a compelling figure making me doubt the boys' morality. I found it completely consistent with Dean's code that he let her go. It was the same decision he made in Girl Next Door when he let Amy's son go. He hadn't killed yet. I was unsurprised Dean and Sam were on the same page and won't be surprised if he applies the same logic to Benny. The situation with Benny will get sticky if it's no longer clear Benny is choosing not to kill. That could have been an area they explored more with Amy. A possible point of contention that carries some weight would have been whether to trail her until the full moon, since it is so very unlikely she will resist her werewolf nature. She showed all episode she is ruled by emotions, not a moral code. Her response to her boyfriend killing and eating someone was to find a way to excuse it because of her emotions. I see little reason to think she'll rule her animal emotions when they surface. So, should giving her a chance mean they wait until she kills someone before taking action? They didn't make that decision with Madison and they were right. I'd have liked to have seen the boys argue about that, since the current arc is all about their differing perspectives.
So that aspect missed the mark with me, as did making larger parallels to Sam and Dean or Lord of the Flies. Dean has nothing to do with Piggy and if he is worried about how Purgatory has changed him, it's not because he's a beta male who used Purgatory to prove his masculinity. The analogies were weak and undeveloped.
I don't mind risk taking on Supernatural--and I usually love these kinds of episodes. This one just felt more like a poor episode of "Being Human" than an interesting one of Supernatural.
16 - Gerry
Sorry, I meant "Kate" instead of "Amy" in "That could have been an area they explored more with Amy." I must lacking coffee, sleep or both (-:
17 - Mary
Worst episode ever.
18 - TK
One word: allegory.
Two words: poorly executed
Three Words: WORST episode ever
19 - Isabella
If I wanted to watch jerky student films, I would watch student films. I thought I would be watching a polished, professional SPN episode essentially about the Winchesters, as usual, and instead I got a piece of crap not worthy of the Supernatural imprimatur. What a waste of time. Can't imagine how the producers got talked into doing it. It only served to damage the Supernatural franchise and made me wonder if this was a sign of (awful) things to come. I truly hope this is not an omen of another awful season like the last one. I thought this was the year that SPN was supposed to get back to its roots of solid story-telling about The Boys. I'm hungry for details about Dean's year in purgatory but instead I get a place-marker that really has nothing to do with Sam or Dean.
It occurred to me well before the halfway point that this might be a way to introduce a new series about whichever werewolf survived the hour. I really hope that's not the case because a) what a lousy series that would be and 2) I really don't want to think that SPN would whore itself out like that.
20 - JaneWinchester
Agreed, it's 1st episode I truly disliked,... some have been weaker than others, but this one was just dissapointing.