House seeks answers about “caring” from the patient’s wife, asking her why she doesn’t put him in a nursing home. What does she get out of her self-sacrifice? It's as if House is trying to understand this level of devotion and compassion for its own sake. She's "sacrificing (herself) and gets nothing in return..." Why would she do that? Does it make her happy? Fulfilled? No, she explains. But not doing it would leave her even emptier. In House's “No Reason” hallucination, Moriarty tells him that he sacrifices himself for “no reason.” House wonders how the wife can derive something from what he sees as a miserable life. Can he apply this to his own life? Does House need to do what he does best to keep himself from being even more miserable?
While House wends his way through this uncharted territory emotional territory, everyone suspects that he has an agenda; that he’s playing with the patient for his amusement, creating a puzzle for himself where there is none.
Not satisfied with leaving the patient and his family with the status quo, House considers the possibility that the patient’s paralysis might be something curable after hearing the patient grunt (which House translates as speech). But everyone attacks House’s motives. Cameron mocks him; Cuddy accuses; Wilson lectures and scolds. Meeting House at the park, Wilson accuses him of fabricating a mystery for his amusement.
"You didn't tell the wife it was just a grunt?"
"No, of course not."
House retorts that he's built them up with too much false hope and can't let them down, playing up his image as a jerk. It’s a safe fall-back position for him. But in his encounters with the wife and the patient, there is nothing in House’s demeanor, body language or remarks that suggest anything other than sincere belief that the paralyzed, wheelchair-bound patient has something curable. And that there's a chance that his quality of life for both patient and family will be improved. There is an idealism in House's approach to medicine that comes out in moments like this.
Article comments
1 - hl_lover
Great review, Barbara!
I think one of the key things of this episode, looking at it in the retrospective light of the further events of Season 3 (what is referred to as the 'Tritter Arc'),as you pointed out, was the isolation House was placed in by having his team reject this new 'persona' that he was projecting and by the loss of his two closest friends and supporters. Everything that subsequently happened, including the return of House's pain, can be linked to these events.
What I found to be interesting from these first few episodes of Season 3, too, was that the speculation that House needed to be in pain and on narcotics was a necessary part of his brilliance. Imo this episode showed that it wasn't true...that House fundamentally was brilliant, and being miserable or in pain was not the trigger for his unique ability to process information.
2 - Barbara Barnett
I completely agree with you HL_L. The tragedy of this episode was that it started House on a downward spiral--one that his colleagues should have suspected would happen. (Especially Wilson). House was in such isolation at the end of the episode. He felt trapped and that no good had come from the ordeal he had put himself through by "choosing life" (as Wilson said.)
3 - NLP
Brilliant review as always, I love your "revisited" reviews! I so enjoyed seeing House be happy; I had hoped that TPTB would not end that joy quite so fast. But everyone's reactions to House foreshadowed all that I hated about Season 3 -- and that was a lot. I agree that what they did to House was unforgivable.
Blowing his idea off as a "hunch" was just stupid and totally unbelievable. Experienced people who have hunches (doctors, law enforcement officers, scientists, etc.), aren't just blindly guessing. They may not be able sometimes to articulate very well what is behind their "hunch," but it is still a deduction made from a lifetime of experience. I try to just keep telling myself, "artistic license," the need to create drama, the need to keep the drama going, etc., etc., yet I still get infuriated!
I just thought everyone around House in Season 3 (especially Cameron & Wilson) was/were acting out of character (from the way they'd been carefully crafted & set up in the 1st 2 seasons). I hated, and still hate that.
4 - Tigerfeet
Barbara.
I have been a silent reader of your articles on House since you "took over" frome Diane Kristine. I love them, they are so well written and expresses most of my own thoughts on House and the fabolous acting of Hugh Laurie. (Are there ANY emotions he is not able to express, or ANY more or less outragous behaviour he can't convey without grace and humour!? He seems to bring out new nuances to his acting all the time.)
Like so many of your readers you have also opened my eyes to the more subtle messages of the episodes and the series as a whole. Thank you! This has also made me read all your previous posts on Thought Process. And for the first time in my life I have read some fan-fiction!
Thanks for enhancing my already huge enjoyment of House and Hugh!
5 - Barbara Barnett
Thanks NLP and Tigerfeet. I was a big fan of Diane's reviews (and she was a lot quicker to get her reviews up than I am--still don't know how she mangaed that).
I will continue the "revisted" episode reviews while we're waiting for new episodes to appear. This week (and it appears that FOX is rerunning season three in order now. Cool) we have episode 2 of season three, "Cane and Able," which features such a brilliant performance by Hugh L.
And Tigerfeet--welcome to the guilty pleasure of fanfiction!
Up later today: The "Thought Process" House Trivia Quiz
6 - Jane
How real is House's not understanding self-sacrifice? He is perfectly willing to sacrifice himself, not generally for another person, but for his principles. (Think of the Vogler speech.)
7 - Barbara Barnett
How real is House's not understanding self-sacrifice? He is perfectly willing to sacrifice himself, not generally for another person, but for his principles. (Think of the Vogler speech.)
I think that House not only understands self-sacrifice, but (in his own) was does it. As you say, he self-sacrifices for a principle (and his very strict--though elaborate--moral code); he also has done it for patients--Carly for one, but also when he's risked suspension or firing for other patients as well (Mark Warner, The Howard Hessman character in Sex Kills, among others).
But I don't think that House perceives what he does as "self-sacrifice" as he said to Wilson in Don't Ever Change. He is self-aware of many things. He is not self-aware of his better nature.
8 - Jane
And if he doesn't sacrifice for Stacy, I don't know what he does. Now, Wilson is not entirely wrong to say that House, on some level, wants to be miserable. A person can get stuck living in a certain way and be afraid to change, even when they know change would be good. But there's more to House's actions than just fear or self-pity or emotional inertia.
Funny, I haven't done this kind of character analysis since high school English class -- and never thought I'd be doing it on a TV character!