I love Fringe, but I have to admit there are a lot of details in the plot that I don’t understand. I’m certain that during the coming season, I will click as to the real significance of a previous occurrence and feel totally ridiculous because of how long it took me to get it. Such are the trials and tribulations of a confused blogger.
Paradoxically, it’s the reason I started reviewing Fringe; the way I figure it, if I have to sit down and discuss its finer points each week, I will not only have questions, but be forced to systematically address them and, perhaps, understand things a little bit before the ‘Oh my God I’m so stupid’ moment.
And comments from readers are definitely going to help.
As those of you who have been following my personal blog know or those who have read my first two reviews of Supernatural for Blogcritics have probably guessed, I’m quite the avid X-Files fan. Supernatural filled some of the void, but there was still something missing — government conspiracies. Which is the rest of the void Fringe helps to fill up.
But where The X-Files took its time getting us into the conspiracy (only five of The X-Files’ season one episodes had to do with the alien government conspiracy mytharc), Fringe revels in it; the paranormal all comes in to support it, rather than to distract us from it. It’s also interesting to note the use of ‘fringe science’ in Fringe, as opposed to The X-Files, where most of the mysteries were explainable through paranormal science.
Fringe’s first season finished on the pretty incredible scene of Olivia Dunham meeting William Bell. It wasn’t the fact that William Bell is played by Leonard Nimoy that is pretty incredible (although it’s always exciting to see Leonard Nimoy). It was the fact that Olivia Dunham met him… in the World Trade Center. Yes, you read that right – the Twin Towers were not destroyed in the parallel universe where William Bell lives.
You’d expect season two of Fringe to open up with a startled Olivia Dunham looking at William Bell and demanding answers — but if you did, it means you don’t quite get the nature of this show yet. No, my friends, season two opens with a car accident — the responsible party runs away, find his way into an apartment, kills the owner, smashes his face in, and connects himself to the victim whose facial features he then acquires. Not quite the elegant way the Alien Bounty Hunter used to morph in The X-Files, but still, pretty scary (considering this guy, by all accounts, is human).






.jpg?t=20130517094513)

Article comments
1 - Blue Sunflower
There were actually two specific X-Files homages: the TV screen, and the senator in the Broyles scene you recapped. The senator specifically mentioned the FBI's "old X classification".
Also, Peter didn't forget he liked custard. This is the alter-Peter, who never liked custard to begin with. The one who liked custard is Walter's *real* son, the Peter who died at age 7.
2 - NancyGail
Charlie, in theory anyway, is still alive. Think about it. He has to be to get close to the Feds and the Bishops.
Want crossover? Bones is the hour before. That would be fun!
3 - Sahar
Blue Sunflower: I totally missed that; I just rewatched it - good catch! And re: custard - I thought that was why. Thanks for confirming! I wonder how much 'doubles' in parallel universes are going to resemble each other?
NancyGail: Ah, but he isn't really Charlie, is he now. I just hope 'Charlie' won't try to kill Olivia - that'll probably really traumatize her!
About Bones: I read the Kathy Reich books that inspired the series, but didn't dare add Bones to my already busy schedule. Unfortunately I still haven't figured out how to live on no sleep :) However, I have to admit that show is high on my 'to watch' list at the moment...