TV Review: Bleak House Part I

Bleak House is said to be Dickens' greatest work and by "is said," I mean a bunch of guys at Harvard made a list and made it number one. So, because I do what the white guys tell me to, I read it.

Now let me tell you a little something about Dickens and me. We don’t usually get along. I love his characters and his stories but they are so lost in his ponderous shenanigans that I tend to throw the book across the room several times before finishing it and Bleak House is the most ponderous of them all. But if you can wade through the page long descriptions of a fireplace then you will find a breathtaking array of characters, a true Dickensian treasure. But like running a marathon, it’s only useful for bragging rights and professional athletes and it is the one book I would recommend “training” for.

Therefore, I have always been of the opinion that Dickens books translate to film more so than most Victorian writers and Bleak House is no exception. This is not because I’m lazy, or a child of the TV generation, who wants nothing more than to kick back and be entertained but rather because the process of translating Dickens to film is like refining a diamond. You take off the ugly rock of paid-by-the-word ruminations and what emerges is a beautiful gem. Though the movie jumps from character to character with reckless abandon, each is played so memorably that you never forget a face. And each face is so emotionally charged that the complexity of the book is spelled out through the innocently determined face of Charley Neckett to the pathetic obsession of Mr. Guppy. Even Mademoiselle Hortense is instantly revealed by the look of parched desperation she gives to the mirror reflection of her mistress, Lady Deadlock. I read a criticism that the actors played their parts too intensely. Yet, I would argue that anything less would render the movie prey to the book’s worst of follies, boredom.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • Bleak House Bleak House

    Movie DVD

  • Bleak House (Penguin Classics) Bleak House (Penguin Classics)

Article comments

  • 1 - Bill Wallo

    Jan 23, 2006 at 1:02 pm

    I enjoyed the show. Didn't care for some of the trick cinematography that seemed more at home in a sci fi flick than a Victorian period piece, but overall I thought they did very well.

  • 2 - Rodney Welch

    Jan 23, 2006 at 3:40 pm

    I get the feeling from your comments that this adaptation is mostly geared toward Dickens-haters. Have at it.

  • 3 - Lyz

    Jan 23, 2006 at 3:59 pm

    I think the Dicken's lovers will like it too because it has EVERYTHING in it and doesn't veer from the book. Plus, it aired first last year in England and it was the Princess Di of tv shows. And can you be English and hate Dickens? Doesn't that violate a law? It would be like being American and hating Thoreau, which I am and I do, so probably not a good example, eh?

  • 4 - barb

    Feb 27, 2006 at 7:01 am

    Who plays Lady Deadlock in Bleak House? Is it Scully from the Xfiles???

  • 5 - Lyz

    Feb 27, 2006 at 7:20 am

    Yes it is! Lady Deadlock is played by Gillian Anderson. Isn't she awesome?

  • 6 - Barb

    Feb 27, 2006 at 9:50 am

    YES she truly is!! So TOTALLY different than anything I'd ever seen her do. Lovely actress.
    I just read her bio on another site and she was apparently raised in England, returning to the US when she was 9 or so..but had to overcome the accent. I'm amazed when actor can do this!!

  • 7 - Nancy

    Feb 27, 2006 at 11:58 am

    I've always enjoyed Dickens, but I was a strange child, anyway. His books have to be read with an understanding that he was writing for a slower, more leisurely time, when people had longer attention spans than they do now, and were considerably more literate - in the literal sense of that word.

    No doubt, his character development still can beat just about any other 'modern' writer. So can the mood he creates. Is there anything creepier than the fog that crawls through London & blankets the Courts, or subliminally nastier than the rag-&-bone shop & its vile owner? The only problem I ever had with his writing was his tendency to depend on dei ex machinae in his plots, but again, I read from the vantage point of 160+ years later, when such machinations were not quite so worn & tired by subsequent overuse & overexposure as they are now. Even so, he still turns out a rippin' good tale, and translates well into modern media. I'm sorry I missed it; I hope it will be available on DVD in the near future.

    Just out of curiousity, who played the character of Jo the sweeper?

  • 8 - Chris

    Aug 28, 2006 at 9:21 am

    I have watched this series with much awe
    especially with regards to the acting and the realistic Victorian period settings along with fantastic Dicken's Storyline ,though the quick cutting from one storyline to the next has kept the story line flowing ,I was very dismayed that
    the Final programme was too rushed ,with the important final Concluding scenes of the cherished storyline jumping too rapidly between scenes with little time to reflect after following the Storyline and Characters for
    so long,I was very disapointed ,that the pace was
    not slowed down for the final climax of the Story

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 27, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs