Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes Engaged - Comments Page 2

Article comments

Subscribe to comment RSS

• 26 - Dawn

  Jun 17, 2005 at 2:04 pm

  Are you paying for banging hot chicks now RJ, or did I misunderstand you?
  
  Also, Tom is cruise is not "good-looking" he's Hollywood handsome.
  
  Eric Olsen, now there's a good-looking guy!

• 27 - Eric Olsen

  Jun 17, 2005 at 2:06 pm

  we people in our 40s much prefer women in their 30s to women in their 20s, or at least I do
  
  thanks Dawn, aren't you in your 30s?

• 28 - Dawn

  Jun 17, 2005 at 2:08 pm

  Yes I am, why do you ask, aren't you already banging me?

• 29 - Mark Saleski

  Jun 17, 2005 at 2:09 pm

  I am still capable of banging hot chicks who are 20-something WITHOUT PAYING FOR IT, then something is going right...
  
  i'm with eric.
  
  i consider this a sign of stunted maturity.

• 30 - The Theory

  Jun 17, 2005 at 2:11 pm

  "personally, I'm all atwitter"
  
  I always knew it'd take a celebrity couple to get you enthused about something.

• 31 - Eric Olsen

  Jun 17, 2005 at 2:19 pm

  I'm ALWAYS enthused (see #28)

• 32 - Dawn

  Jun 17, 2005 at 2:37 pm

  I am still wondering who's paying to get banged around here? Sheesh...

• 33 - Eric Olsen

  Jun 17, 2005 at 2:44 pm

  someone must be to keep the world's oldest profession humming along

• 34 - Craig Lyndall

  Jun 17, 2005 at 3:11 pm

  The Bunny Ranch in Vegas stays open for a reason...

• 35 - Tom Johnson

  Jun 17, 2005 at 3:59 pm

  I still contend that Tom Cruise wasn't acting in Magnolia - that was the real Tom Cruise. The scene where his character is interviewed by a woman presents a really venomous, disturbing portrait of power. Cruise's hyperactive displays of spazzy love lately seem extremely false (and creepy) - like he's putting on an act of how he thinks someone "in love" should act. Cruise creeps me out, plain and simple.

• 36 - Brooke Lee

  Jun 17, 2005 at 6:24 pm

  It's the new Hollywood trend! Forget having a kid; that's so passe.
  
  Now it's: Hi, how are you? Let's get married!
  
  Even I wanna go to Vegas now, get married and have it annulled the next morning.

• 37 - RJ

  Jun 18, 2005 at 6:38 pm

  "Are you paying for banging hot chicks now RJ, or did I misunderstand you?"
  
  LOL!
  
  No, you misunderstood me...
  
  I'm saying that most dudes in their 40s would have to pay to have relations with hot chicks in their 20s...
  
  But apparently not Tom Cruise! :)
  

• 38 - Freckles

  Jun 19, 2005 at 1:02 pm

  Hah. Katie is just another highly-paid beard. She's getting cash and a high profile; he's getting publicity and the veneer of heterosexuality. He should have kept his old PR rep. He needs to be kept on a leash.

• 39 - Eric Olsen

  Jun 20, 2005 at 8:40 am

  it's probably more complicated than that - I think Tom J has at least part of a point

• 40 - Silas Kain

  Jun 20, 2005 at 11:47 am

  He needs to be kept on a leash.
  
  And all this time I thought he WAS kept on a leash. At least that's what I heard at the last Scientology seminar. Madame Cruise was L. Ron's bitch.

• 41 - Natalie Davis

  Jun 20, 2005 at 5:11 pm

  roflmao! oh, that isn't nice, but i can't help but laugh. shame on me.

• 42 - Silas Kain

  Jun 20, 2005 at 5:33 pm

  Yeah, if here is a Cruise spawn it will probably be manufactured by artificial insemination with some upper management Scientologist's sperm. Lord knows Mr. Cruise probably shoots blanks if he even shoots at all. Oh, and by the way, they'll name the little offspring L. Ron Cruise.

• 43 - RJ

  Jun 24, 2005 at 2:14 am

  I own (and have sorta-kinda read) several Scientology books. I think they are mostly bunk.
  
  But, if it works for someone...
  
  TC isn't hurting anybody with his chosen "religion" or cult or ideology or whatever it is.
  
  Attacks on Scientology and its practitioners, while sometimes amusing, when taken to a certain extent are nothing more than bigotry.