The "Reimaged" Battlestar Galactica - Light Years Beyond the Original - Page 3

All we know about the Cylons is that they were created by man decades ago, and eventually turned on humanity, destroying them for reasons unknown. The new show's creators (or reimagers?) chose to maintain the look of the original robotic creatures, which I felt from day one looked altogether rather silly, with the red beam of light pulsating back and forth where normally one would find eyes. A small price to pay in exchange for a show of such high quality. Another smart choice: the elimination, at least so far, of the annoying child character, Boxey, who appeared in the miniseries, but is nowhere to be seen in the episodes broadcast to date.

In his Dec 2004 review, Michael King described the new version as "not your father's Galactica", and Matt Shafer followed earlier this month, calling it "the best show you're probably not watching", adding "In only five episodes Battlestar Galactica established itself as not only the best Science Fiction show on television but one of the best shows on television bar none." Both are accurate descriptions of the most pleasant surprise of the 2004-2005 television season. The good news is that after five aired episodes, the Sci-Fi Channel has ordered a second set of 13 episodes. The bad news is, I've lost another hour during the week when I could be doing something else besides watching television!

Page 1Page 2 — Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Phillip Winn

    Feb 14, 2005 at 2:53 am

    All 13 episodes of the first season have already aired in Europe, and are available on the internet. While the series is slightly uneven, and one episode major plot hole in particular is galling*, I'm very glad they're coming back for another season.

    * It has to do with how long it take Doc Baltar to detect a Cylon. Which is it -- a couple of minutes or a few hours? Which fits the plot, I guess!

  • 2 - RJ

    Feb 14, 2005 at 10:35 pm

    I'm interested now. Great review!

  • 3 - Kujo

    Feb 15, 2005 at 12:23 am

    I've scene all 13 eps (via the Internet), and I have to say that it's easily one of the best sci-fi series in years. Some of the eps were un-even, is specially in the second half, but things picked up at end. Overall, it's a splended series. I love the dark, moody, atmosphere.

  • 4 - Dave Nalle

    Feb 15, 2005 at 12:29 am

    "Light years beyond the original" is an apt description. Since the original was cringingly awful, those light years put this one in the realm of mediocre, mildly irritating B-grade science fiction. On a par with Andromeda.

    Dave

  • 5 - Carpe Bonum

    Feb 15, 2005 at 3:09 am

    Yes, it's a great series. It's a season pass in my TiVo, and I just watched "Alibi."

    Thanks for the review. Nice job.

  • 6 - chris mankey

    Sep 24, 2005 at 12:50 pm

    "Light years beyond the original" is an apt description. Since the original was cringingly awful, those light years put this one in the realm of mediocre, mildly irritating B-grade science fiction. On a par with Andromeda.

    Dave

    No actually it's very very good. What the hell where you watching?

  • 7 - Dave Nalle

    Sep 24, 2005 at 12:58 pm

    I'm watching a remake of Battlestar Galactica without the campy elements that at least made it amusing and with a whole bunch of bad overacting and incomprehensible plotting.

    Dave

  • 8 - Chris mankey

    Oct 21, 2005 at 2:31 pm

    I'm watching a remake of Battlestar Galactica without the campy elements that at least made it amusing and with a whole bunch of bad overacting and incomprehensible plotting.

    Most of the acting is understated if anything! As for "incomprehensible plotting" I guess if you're not smart enough to follow along I don't know if it's incomprehensible to anybody but you.

  • 9 - DaveR

    Oct 17, 2006 at 3:24 am

    Series 3 of BattleStar is very bad and is basically a prisoner/gorillar warfare story, very dark and disapointing. Its like the same people who ruined the Andromeda plot have done the same to Battlestar. Please learn from Andromeda and don't hire the same writers or directors. Andromeda started strong but failed from mid to end and finished in a joke of an ending...

  • 10 - Randy Reichardt

    Oct 19, 2006 at 1:30 am

    I would disagree. I think Season 3 has advanced the story considerably, and created the opportunity for the writers to change to focus of the show to almost animal-like survival. It's a bold move, and I find the SE3 episodes to date very compelling. It's also interesting to see some chinks in the Cylon armour, so to speak. It's a great series.

  • 11 - SciFiFan

    Apr 24, 2008 at 12:40 pm

    The original BSG series is VERY GOOD. The re-imagined series to too violent. I've tried watching the series and I can't.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 11, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs