The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers

First up on the films nominated for an Oscar is The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers. It's been nominated for Best Picture, Art Direction, Sound, Sound Editing (how's that for splitting hairs?), Visual Effects, and Film Editing. How it missed out on Makeup, Cinematography, and Best Supporting Actor for Golem (more on that later) is beyond me.

Let's get the bad out of the way first. The worst thing I can say about this movie is that it is another one with an unfortunate colon in the title. At least it doesn't have two colons in the title, like Star Wars: Episode II: Attack of the Clones, but that movie sucked anyway so you kind of expected it. Other than that, the scene with the white horse (I can't remember it's name) was lame. Gandalf shows up, says a few lines, walks out of the forest and whistles for his horse. The horse gallops up, in slow motion, in a gauzy, out-of-focus shot. I thought we were going to have to cover the kids' eyes for an equine-wizard sex scene. Yech.

Beyond that, this movie rocked. A little more humor than in the last movie, and dwarf jokes are always welcome. "Don't tell the Elf". Classic. Speaking of the Elf, Legolas is awesome. He's like a character out of a John Woo movie come to Middle Earth. He's shooting off arrows at an incredible pace, yet his quiver is never empty.

Oh yea, Golem as Best Supporting Actor. Hollywood always loves a mentally challenged character. Jack Nicholson, Leonardo DiCaprio, Sean Penn, the list goes on. So why not nominate this year's favorite character struggling with a split personality?

I think the movie is a shoe-in for two awards, probably three, but Best Picture won't be one of them. The Academy would hate to see a fantasy trilogy win the big prize for two of its three installments, and everyone know that Return of the King will be better, if only because it will have a real ending.

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - KG

    May 25, 2003 at 9:43 am

    it was a great movie! it had a few slow points, but it was overall great, maybe better than the first. there was definatly more humor in this film, to brighten dark moments. This movie had more dark moments and more battle sequences than the last also. I wouldn't chnge much about it! It's one of my favorites!

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 18, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs