"The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen"

I have to admit, I was prepared to not like (OK, hate) The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. The commercials looked lame and centered on Sean Connery's Schwarzeneggerian bon mots and special effects. Even the title, later acronymed to "LXG", cried out poseur.

When Connery's Alan Quartermain boasted "I'm waiting to be impressed" during the exposition I was sure I had my opening line for this review. Perhaps it was my low expectations, or maybe some unexpectedly decent filmmaking (or, to quote Grandpa Simpson, it was possibly "a little from column A, a little from column B"), but I kind of liked this movie.

Although it is based on comics deity Alan Moore's book of the same name, the story is sort of screwy at points. And the plot hole involving (no pun intended) the Invisible Man's disappearance was deeper than the Chunnel. But, having checked my disbelief at the door, I sat back on my old blue plaid sofa and enjoyed 110 minutes of goofy fun.

It is 1899 and a crazed mask-clad villain is wreaking havoc in Europe. Quartermain is asked by the English government to lead a group of odd heroes to save the day.

Odd indeed. Dorain Gray, The Invisible Man, Mina Harker, Captain Nemo, Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde and Tom Sawyer all join forces to foil The Phantom's plot.

It turns out in the end that The Phantom, later revealed as Holmes' archenemy Dr. Moriarty, was the very person that had assembled the League for his own nefarious purposes.

Pretty standard superhero stuff, but the look of the film is really what elevates the material. The design of Nemo's Nautilus is stunning. Every time it was on screen I found myself marveling at it. The costumes were wonderful too. I especially liked The Invisible Man's somewhat pointy hat.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Phillip Winn

    Oct 14, 2004 at 10:55 am

    I really liked the first two-thirds of the movie. By the end, I loathed it.

    The movie falls apart at the end, with special-effects overload, giant villains introduced out of nowhere, and only silly conflict.

    A great idea, poorly executed, I think.

  • 2 - Andertoons

    Oct 14, 2004 at 11:05 am

    Yeah, what the hell?! I'd written in my notes "what is with this incredibly over-muscled thing?!"

    I would've liked to have seen the film live up to its origins, but as an afternoon popcorn film, not bad.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 21, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs