The Hours Review: Why Didn't Julianne Moore Win An Oscar?

The Hours gave me two of the best hours of my life. Being one of the most intricate and detailed pictures I've seen in years, it shimmered with beautiful make-up, costumes, and hair, resplendent sets, and the actors couldn't have made single choice or line reading even the least bit more believable or riveting.

Although the Academy felt the need to make up for Nicole's non-Oscar win for Moulin Rouge last year, Julianne Moore actually delivers the most powerful and superlative performance in this film. I was brought to tears just seeing the interactions between her character and her son about an event as simple as making a cake for her husband. And I'm extremely heated that she did not even receive a leading actress nomination for her role in this movie (she did receive a supporting acting nomination for The Hours), which I think obviously surpasses her performance in Far From Heaven, which she was nominated for.

Though many parts of the movie seem unexplained because of the time frame incompatibility of book-to-movie, the outline of the plot and the characterization fixate the audience from beginning to end - both of which are surprising.

Although this movie does seem to drag at times, and certain supporting characters seem to have no purpose whatsoever, the movie is a huge success for the intelligent and intellectual audience member, and will be a baffling bore for the ordinary mainstream idiotic sheep that just eat up laughable crap like Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle and Jeepers Creepers 2.
Edit:Aaman,Tan The Man

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Tan The Man

    Jul 14, 2005 at 1:55 am

    Hated the movie.

    Although I will add that if you add the time that either Meryl Streep, Julianne Moore and Nicole Kidman appeared on screen, they are about equal. How you could give one actress a leading actress nomination over another is beyond me?

  • 2 - Chris Evans

    Jul 14, 2005 at 2:02 am

    Tan The Man, it's most likely the same case with Collateral. Nicole's a bigger star than Julianne, so according to their logic, that allows them to give her a leading nomination over Julianne--the lesser star(rolls eyes)--a supporting nomination.

  • 3 - Tan The Man

    Jul 14, 2005 at 2:04 am

    As true as that might be, The Hours is a different case since it IS an ensemble film with more than 2 leading actors/actresses. Although with Collateral, you are right on the money.

  • 4 - Chris Evans

    Jul 14, 2005 at 2:06 am

    And...I really don't see how you could have possibly hated this movie. o__O

  • 5 - Tan The Man

    Jul 14, 2005 at 2:08 am

    Well, in my defense, I think Nicole Kidmas is overrated and I saw this film after she won the Oscar. So I might have been very distracted and maybe overcritical with Nicole's section of the film. I did love Julianne Moore's section. I was indifferent to Streep's.

  • 6 - Chris Evans

    Jul 14, 2005 at 2:13 am

    Hm...I agree with you about Streep. Even though she is one of my fave 3 actresses, for some reason I wasn't feeling her in this film. Not really sure why, but I was just kind of underwhelmed. Although I've loved her in everything else I've ever seen her in. ::Shuffles to quickly write a review of Angels In America::

  • 7 - Tan The Man

    Jul 14, 2005 at 2:30 am

    Hah... Man have I been wanting to watch Angels in America. Dammit.

  • 8 - Chris Evans

    Jul 14, 2005 at 9:46 pm

    OMG You should....it's the best thing ever!

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 14, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs