The Duke Presents The Best Of 2003 - Page 3

Thankfully it doesn't even have to throw stones at you, because it turns out that you wanna do those things anyway. Put the sword down, man, I already was whistling.

This here is one of those Mockumentary things like Zelig or Bad Boys II, that use the conventions of the normal documentary to tell their delightful tale, in this case the delightful tale being all about the folk singing and the mandolins.

Some folks have been harping on that it's Spinal Tap with Folk Music, and sure enough, those three Spinal Taps are joined in holy matrimony once more in this here affair, as a folk band by the name of The Folksmen. It's more than Spinal Tap with acoustic guitars though, at least 57% more as far as The Duke is concerned.

Interesting fact - The Folksmen supported Spinal Tap on several occasions, mostly being booed off by an audience who didn't know it was the same fella's they'd sold a lung to see.

Guest is a fine director also, and if you haven't done so, The Duke recommends picking up Waiting For Guffman and Best In Show for yet more Mockumentary mirth.

CAPTURING THE FRIEDMANS

Documentary Of The Year What Was Real But You Kinda Wish It Wasn't

This right here is some unpleasant viewing. In case you didn't know, it's about a man is arrested on account of abusing children, but maybe all he did was look at child pornography, without ever physically carrying out his fantasies.

We don't know what's real, we don't know what's been made up, we don't know a damn thing, other than that this here is a brilliant film.

Thanks. I guess.

THE HOBBITS PART 3 - THE KING RETURNS

Arachnid Of The Year

No, it wasn't the best film of 2003. It wasn't even Peter Jacksons best film. It wasn't even the best Hobbits film. But it was still rather good. Especially the giant spider.

What this third instalment in the moderately-successful The Hobbits Trilogy is all about, is the king returns. Where he returns to is anyone's guess. Maybe he goes to those two towers what were the title of The Hobbits Part 2.

Thankfully, there are plenty of giant elephants and spiders about the screen so this plot-hole is covered over nicely. Well done Hobbits.

Continued on the next page Page 1Page 2 — Page 3 — Page 4Page 5Page 6

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • Irreversible Irreversible

    IRREVERSIBLE (DVD MOVIE)

  • A Mighty Wind A Mighty Wind
  • Spellbound Spellbound
  • Capturing the Friedmans Capturing the Friedmans
  • Hulk (Widescreen 2-Disc Special Edition) Hulk (Widescreen 2-Disc Special Edition)
  • The Magdalene Sisters The Magdalene Sisters
  • Lost in Translation Lost in Translation

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - visualsimplicity

    Apr 19, 2004 at 1:54 am

    Am I being weird here or did you use the word "what" in place of the word "that" in at least 5 different places?

  • 2 - Chris Kent

    Apr 19, 2004 at 7:08 am

    Am I being weird here or did you use the word "what" in place of the word "that" in at least 5 different places?

    lol.....Welcome to the World of Duke, it's a lovely land populated by dark-eyed Ian Holms where trees throw apples, zombies dance and Hulk is considered one of the best films of the year......though I do believe an Arachnid Hall of Fame is in order....

    An excellent list.

  • 3 - Aaron, Duke De Mondo

    Apr 19, 2004 at 8:30 am

    Sorry visual simplicity. I work hard on my grammar but still i screw up on occasion. Man, that grammar. It's a harsh mistress but i love like what i love a fine zombie film by the Lucio Fulci's.
    Thanks Visual Simplicity.
    Chris! Rising to the dukes defence! Good for you! Gosh, all these nice words (and so good with the grammar) and going to get me all blushified. Thank you!

  • 4 - Eric Olsen

    Apr 19, 2004 at 8:34 am

    Indeed, what is the deal with "what"? Are we working idiomatically? I fear such usage is going to confuse the kiddies.

    Very interesting list, by the way. Thanks!

  • 5 - Aaron, Duke De Mondo

    Apr 19, 2004 at 8:42 am

    Arachnid hall of fame - Those 8 legged freaks would be in there. They were very good as far as the duke is concerned. Also, Arachnophobia had an abundance of the little bastards what have the eight legs. Tarantuals - The Deadly Cargo had plenty of the tarantulas, even though they cant really kill you unless your allergic, but hey, that didn't stop Michael Caine getting stressed as fuck on account of the bees. "The bees have always been our friends"
    Harry Potter Part 2 - The Chamber Of The Secrets had great spiders.
    Did i mention i'm arachnophobic? And still these things draw me towards them. Filthy arachnids.
    Eric, thanks for the kind words and please don't worry about the whats and the thats, its all language man, give peace a chance as john lennon said one time before they shot him.

  • 6 - Eric Olsen

    Apr 19, 2004 at 8:49 am

    On a serious front, you are an excellent, prolific, and erudite contributor and I wouldn't want anyone to take you less seriously - or be confused like our poor VisSim here - due to eccentric usage.

  • 7 - Aaron, Duke De Mondo

    Apr 19, 2004 at 8:56 am

    Point taken Eric, although i don't know what i can do about it. It's the style, y'see, but yes, this particular article had more of the what/that swinging than the others. possibly on account of the length. Who the hell knows. Maybe i'll make an opening statement - "The Duke has read many novels, some of which were originally Russian, and he knows a thing or two about Thomas Middleton and the Shakespeares so don't worry when he starts waxing anti-grammatically, it's all part of his charm, and a fitting substitute for a disastourously inefficient manhood."
    Eric, i don't want to put no one off, but when you get into a style-type thing with the old writing and such, it's hard to abandon it, even if it is one what makes folks think you're thick.

  • 8 - Eric Olsen

    Apr 19, 2004 at 9:06 am

    It's up to you, but I assure you that you would be no less charming in standard English.

    I have written idiomatically in the past and was told by editors that a very little bit - like in dialogue - goes a very long way in conveying attitude and perspective without creating a jarring disconnect. I was told to "have faith in the appeal" of my writing on its own terms. In other words - why limit yourself?

  • 9 - Chris Kent

    Apr 19, 2004 at 1:20 pm

    I see El Senor Duke's grammar simply for what it is. He grew up a Droog and he just can't rid himself of the street slang.

    Very, very horrorshow....

  • 10 - Aaron, Duke De Mondo

    Apr 19, 2004 at 1:29 pm

    Chris, once again you've nailed it. You may have seen the film what Stan Kubrick made about me, by the name of The Clockwork Oranges. I had a hard life growing up those many years ago in the future. Now my grammar is all messed up on account of the oranges. Plus, they leave your hands all smelly when you peel them. Damn them oranges.

  • 11 - JR

    Apr 19, 2004 at 1:50 pm

    I vote for jarring disconnect. A reader needs that once in a while.

  • 12 - sheri

    Apr 19, 2004 at 1:57 pm

    I think Duke's grammar is charming!

    I see little pot bellied dudes with pipes, and big red noses, frolicking about in the four leaf clovers, beckoning me to come and spend my American tourist dollars to see the home of (some of them anyways) my ancestors.

    That way, everyone has an excuse to get drunk, and and make fun of me for being proud to be half breed Irish :0)

  • 13 - Chris Kent

    Apr 19, 2004 at 2:01 pm

    I see little pot bellied dudes with pipes, and big red noses, frolicking about in the four leaf clovers....

    Are we still talking about Duke's horror film list here? I don't know about ye guys, but this description has pretty much scared me shitless.....

    Anyway Duke, yet another convert....!

  • 14 - Aaron, Duke De Mondo

    Apr 19, 2004 at 2:03 pm

    Thanks JR and Sherri and any others who thought the same stuff but didn't comment on account of they feel insecure and all shy. It's ok, guys, come on ahead and comment. I would be honoured as a motherfucker.
    Thanks hypothetical non-commentators.
    Thanks real commentators.
    Sheri, hehe. Yes, and also, if you visit The Duke, i do a great exchange wereby your fat american dollars can be turned into these really cool beans what grow into beanstalks. They're great, and more than worth the price of that cow my mum sent me to get. I mean come on, mum, its a motherfucking beanstalk! To the sky? Hello?

  • 15 - visualsimplicity

    Apr 19, 2004 at 2:09 pm

    Yes, and also, if you visit The Duke, i do a great exchange wereby your fat american dollars can be turned into these really cool beans what grow into beanstalks. They're great, and more than worth the price of that cow my mum sent me to get. I mean come on, mum, its a motherfucking beanstalk! To the sky? Hello?

    Hey you alternated. Where's the consistency? Just when I was getting used to the "what" you go and change on me.

  • 16 - Eric Olsen

    Apr 19, 2004 at 2:21 pm

    The ways of the Duke are mutable and mysterious, eh what?

  • 17 - Chris Kent

    Apr 19, 2004 at 2:44 pm

    lmao....

  • 18 - sheri

    Apr 19, 2004 at 2:48 pm

    Welll, Chris, I had to get it outta of ya somehow...just kidding just kidding !

    Duke, and I be climbing that beanstalk, all the way up to God's office, God Himself that is, and I'd be asting Him WHAT'S up. I was tolt that He doesn't get mad at me for gettin' mad at Him, jus' as long as I believe.;0)

  • 19 - Aaron, Duke De Mondo

    Apr 19, 2004 at 3:12 pm

    Sheri, did Mel Gibson tell you that? I wudn't trust him if i were you. Yeah, sure, he talks real nice and says his R's correctly, but he also led a rebellion in scotland one time, and painted his face blue. Obviously folks liked listening to The Cure back then too.

  • 20 - duane

    Apr 19, 2004 at 3:35 pm

    Obviously, the Duke, who gets away with referring to himself in the third person, is effecting an idiomatic style for the sake of playing a very entertaining character. It's perfectly fine to botch the grammar, as long as it's intentional, and as long as it's consistent. The Comment Police are watching you, Duke, and, so far, they like what they see.

  • 21 - sheri

    Apr 19, 2004 at 4:15 pm

    umm. Kind of, Duke. Only Mel Gibson, he says I get to God's office by way of the Queen Mary Mother Of God's office. Only Brandon Lee, he tells me that I just got to believe.And every night I burn every night the dreams the same.*sigh*

  • 22 - Aaron, Duke De Mondo

    Apr 19, 2004 at 6:10 pm

    Nah, Sheri, like many of us, Mel Gibson lost his faith in Madonna after American Life. I mean come on, it was just embaressing. And after she married Cliff Richard, that was too much, and then that film about the sand. Hell the hell cares about sand? It's course and it gets in your eyes. Its irritating. Not like you Padme.
    Who the hell's Padme
    Sorry Madonna
    Thanks Sheri

  • 23 - visualsimplicity

    Apr 19, 2004 at 11:18 pm

    Obviously, the Duke, who gets away with referring to himself in the third person, is effecting an idiomatic style for the sake of playing a very entertaining character. It's perfectly fine to botch the grammar, as long as it's intentional, and as long as it's consistent.

    Ah but see, I've also been meaning to point out that The Duke seems to be inconsistent in referencing himself. It's one of the only times where I've read someone refer to themselves in the third person in one sentence, then in the first person in the very next. It's odd, but also entertaining.

  • 24 - JR

    Apr 20, 2004 at 11:03 am

    "Yes, and also, if you visit The Duke, i do a great exchange wereby your fat american dollars can be turned into these really cool beans what grow into beanstalks. They're great, and more than worth the price of that cow my mum sent me to get. I mean come on, mum, its a motherfucking beanstalk! To the sky? Hello?"

    Hey you alternated. Where's the consistency? Just when I was getting used to the "what" you go and change on me.

    They are two different words.

    The first highlighted word is a conjunction or some kind of a pronoun or something; it could legitimately have been replaced by "which" (or in some cases "who" (actually, I've seen that idiomatic substitution too)). Since its function is mostly structural, you can get away with substituting something unusual without screwing up what you're trying to say.

    The second word, however, is an adjective and has a specific meaning which would be lost otherwise. That one you can't substitute.

    Hmmm, looks like whereby was misspelled.

  • 25 - sheri

    Apr 20, 2004 at 11:38 am

    If you were to come visit me, I would be sure and speak in proper english, with as little of my southern accent as I could.

    However, stay around long enough, after we get kicked back and all comfy, I might slip into my natural way of speaking...accent, vernacular, the whole works, if I want you to get a true sense of who I am.I will even mix it up.And when I really get going people from others parts often can not understand me at all.

    I have found the same thing happens to me when I'm communicating on the interent.Aside from Duke's misspelled words, or "incorrect" usage,(who hasn't done that?) I feel it is the same with him, and because of that, he seems a much more real person to me.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 21, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs