And those events, then.
They are incredibly hard to watch, even for card-carrying members of Gore-hounds Anonymous like myself. It's not the violence depicted, as such, as the effect it has on the afflicted. The barrage of whippings, floggings and derisory hoots of laughter would be somewhat desensitising after a while, if not for our man Caviezel yet again. The energy he puts into this performance is truly staggering, and serves on occasion to almost replicate the lash of the whip on our own hypothetical flesh.
When Christ tumbles down a set of stone steps under the weight of the cross, the sensation invoked in The Duke's stomach was next to sickening.
This is, in effect, the perfect response to accusations of inhumanity in the film. I, for one, felt nothing but intense sorrow throughout the ordeal. And it is an ordeal. From the trial and mocking to the final piercing of the side, the humiliation and torture clock in at least an hour and a half's worth of screen time. Whether or not you wish to endure such an assault on the emotions is a matter for personal consideration. When Christ cries for the forgiveness of his persecutors, as nails are driven through bloodied, broken hands, the sorrow is overwhelming. Surely the inhumanity lies in the likes of Kill Bill, (which The Duke loved regardless), with its parade of mutilated samurai evoking cheers of approval rather than mournful regret.
The idea being tossed around in some quarters, that this is nothing more than a two-hour extravaganza of barbaric torture, is, as far as The Duke is concerned, painfully short-sighted.
It is true that there are moments when the spectacle threatens to overcome the motive - to wit, blood splattering the camera lens, and a particularly unpleasant visit from a crow.
But again, these moments are countered by the tranquillity of the intercut flashbacks. Perhaps the greatest of these is a simple conversation between Mary and Jesus about a recently crafted Dining-Table. Maia Morgenstern is quietly brilliant in the role of The Mother Of Christ, certainly a more rewarding performance than her reading of Woman At Fountain in Dark Prince - The True Story Of Dracula.
In fact, it is mostly through Mary's eyes that the events leading to the crucifixion take place. She serves as the human respite from the near-inhuman barbarity on display elsewhere, and yet her gaze lingering on the broken, mutilated body of her son makes the scenes infinitely more poignant.
But what of the Anti-Semitic content, Duke?







Article comments
1 - rob
I agree with everything you wrote.
Especially the ending.
What's with Satan wearing the black wig? Screaming like a lunatic. Give me a break. I guess it was for the Christians to show them that Satan was defeated. As for me, an agnostic bordering on atheist, it jarred me back to reality and the silliness of my life.
I do wish they would have ended it with the Pieta image. That was awesome.
I've been reading reviews and yours was one of the better and articulate ones so I thought I should comment. Thanks!
2 - Aaron, Duke De Mondo
Why thank you!
And Lo, The Duke Did Blush.
Yes, i felt those final moments of computer-generated nonsense took me completely out of the film. What in hell's CGI wig-wearing name was he thinking? As if the real stuff wasn't achingly beautiful enough! "Hey, i know, let's have some CGI rain drops. Wouldn't that be the coolest?"
"Uh, sure Mel, just don't be gettin' all Mad Max on us, ok big guy? Do whatever you want, man."
I bought the soundtrack album yesterday, which is fantastic also. I note they didn't feel the need to round it off with a techno-remix. Pity Braveheart hadn't took the same route.
But still, the film was perfect in every other damn respect.
Thanks again Rob. Means a lot.
www.geocities.com/mondoirlando