Why all of the activity regarding DMCA exemption requests? Because it is an egregious denial of consumer's basic rights that they cannot make copies of their own DVDs or copy-protected CDs. How can this possibly be justified?
321 Studios says it can't:
- Hollywood fought back against a maker of DVD copying software, saying the company is allegedly trafficking tools of digital theft.
Seven major motion picture studios filed a counterclaim Thursday in U.S. District Court, Northern District of California against 321 Studios, makers of DVD Copy Plus and DVD X Copy.
The software sold at stores nationwide allows the user to make a copy of a DVD to a blank CD or DVD by defeating the copy protections encoded onto the original movie disc — activity the studios say is a legal no-no.
The movie studios say the software contains the power of digital piracy, and asked the court to enjoin 321 Studios from selling it or distributing it further. The studios also seek damages from any proceeds derived from the company's software sales.
"It's like somebody selling a digital crowbar. It's like breaking into the castle if you will," said Patricia Benson, an attorney for the studios. [AP]
Actually no, it isn't. My daughter is 3 and she plays either Shrek, The Wizard of Oz, Snow White, Toy Story 1 or 2, or The Emperor's New Groove EVERY FREAKING DAY OF THE WEEK. Because she is 3 and doesn't have the dexterity of a jeweler yet, these DVDs tend to wear out rather quickly. I should be able to make a copy of a new DVD when I first get it in defense against the predations of little fingers. Hollywood can shove my lawfully obtained smudged, scratched and unplayable copy of Shrek sideways if it thinks otherwise.
- The studios still hold that both 321 Studios products violate the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which makes illegal the distribution of any technology or device that allows the user to circumvent copy protections put in place by the content owner.