Jean-Pierre Melville's Army of Shadows is, as the ads say, the best-reviewed film of the year. It is scored at 99 on Metacritic! This approaches scary unanimity. Ron Howard's The Da Vinci Code has been mercilessly pummeled by the press on two continents (46 on Metacritic, but who's counting). I'm not about to claim that Army of Shadows is a terrible movie and The Da Vinci Code is a wonderful movie. But the Melville film was a big disappointment to me and to the friend who accompanied me, so I assume we're not completely alone in this, while DaVinci was, to my mind, surprisingly entertaining and satisfying.
The expectations game can have a powerful effect. Even very fine films like Brokeback Mountain can fall prey to this. I heard more than one person saying, it's good but not that good. They ended up feeling the advance word was partly or largely hype. I don't agree in the case of Brokeback, but the first time I saw it I did feel let down, because I had imagined and hoped it would be something impossibly, supernaturally beautiful and powerful, instead of just an excellent movie. It has grown in stature: I read the story, saw the film a second time, and was moved by how much it moved others.
Army of Shadows and The Da Vinci Code are both nominally thrillers, set largely in France, and they're both too long at 150 minutes or so. They have little else in common. I think the episodic structure of Army of Shadows works against its impact, and judged as a thriller, it fails for lack of thrills. As a moody evocation of heroism in an impossible losing situation — the members of the French underground are largely captured or killed by the end — it has some merit, though I think it's been vastly overrated.
Article comments