Movie Review: When a Stranger Calls

So it's come to this. Not content with regular remakes, the Hollywood junk machine is now remaking sections of old films. 1979's When a Stranger Calls isn't a very good film, but it does have a memorable opening sequence. Think about that sequence. Now, jump ahead a quarter of a century to some drug-addled producer getting the idea to expand that compact 15 minutes of creepiness into a 90-minute feature. How does one go about that?

To start, screenwriter Jake Wade Wall adds complications and side trips onto what should be a lean, mean, scaring machine. The basic plot is familiar to anyone who's ever huddled around a campfire swapping scary stories: There's this babysitter, see, (played here by Camilla Belle) and she starts getting these vaguely threatening telephone calls, see, and at some point the police inform her that these calls are coming from inside the house......

It's a fine premise, but it's also a thin premise. Granted, good films have been built on similarly slim inspirations. What galls about this 2006 version of When a Stranger Calls is that all attempts to 'flesh out' the story smack of filler. This remake may not be better, but it certainly is longer.

Take, for instance, the subplot involving the estranged boyfriend of Jill, said babysitter. It provides some early 'character' drama which we honestly could have done without. Later, it provides for a way to get Jill on the phone without involving the Stranger... which seems a bit, shall we say, counterproductive. This subplot goes no further than the hour mark, as the boyfriend does not figure in the climactic battle. The most important thing this subplot does is give Jill a reason to be angry with her self-described best friend (whose name I have forgotten, and who, indeed, isn't even credited on the Internet Movie Database right now), which then gives the filmmakers a reason to have her leave the house Jill is sitting at so she can be killed.

It's the scene with the best friend, actually, that points up the sheer incompetence of Wall's writing. Here we are with a young girl in an absurdly large house that has strange noises and lights that turn themselves on when a room is entered and plenty of places to hide, and the writer has to resort to offing unsympathetic minor characters to generate suspense. Admittedly, the fake scares are pathetic enough (this is the only film in which someone gets frightened by a refrigerator's ice machine), but when it comes time to knuckle down and start throwing some real fright the audience's way, Wall and director Simon West drag out every idiotic cliche they can wrap their grubby mitts around. The scene in question provides:

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for steve-carlson

Article Author: Steve Carlson

Steve Carlson, the proprietor of The Ongoing Cinematic Education of... since 2002, neither conducts electricity nor talks to reptiles. However, he knows someone who does both.

Visit Steve Carlson's author pageSteve Carlson's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Joey

    Jun 23, 2007 at 6:08 pm

    hi i wopuld just like to tell you that i think you review is completely stupid and idiotic...when u said it the 1st movie that you have seen where some1 get scared with the refrigerators icemachine. that is sooo stupid kk if u had been getting phone calls liek that all night i bet you that you would shit yourself kk....and when i said that Jills boyfreinds name wasnt even in the IMDB...IT IS YOU LOSER his name was Bobby jeeze get ur facts str8 kk

  • 2 - Steve C.

    Jun 23, 2007 at 6:59 pm

    I will take your criticism seriously when you learn to both express yourself in a coherent fashion and understand what you read. kthxbye.

  • 3 - Jeremiah Lewis

    Jun 23, 2007 at 9:29 pm

    I'd heard this movie was atrocious. Glad I didn't succumb to my baser instincts and pay 10 bucks to see it in the theatre.

  • 4 - Gregus Watchus Nowus

    Nov 15, 2007 at 5:01 pm

    Watching the movie now on one of the premium channels. Best thing about the movie? The house. I want it. It's beautiful.

  • 5 - Jayson

    Dec 13, 2007 at 10:17 am

    I liked the movie. I bet if you had a teen kid that was babysitting u would never want that to happen to her. Also I hope they make a number 2. Thry did certain things to make it more real. I know I have gotten random calls before weird me out little.

  • 6 - kanishe

    Nov 03, 2008 at 2:13 am

    Im only in my teens, and i found the movie to be a little scarry at first. then after a watched it a few times i laughed at it. I found it was a gd movie, and it was definatly worth seeing.This moving has actaully made brought me back friends with my best friend.werid i no!.
    Its a great movie for teen girls to watch when it comes to those sscarrry slumber parties.And is a great practical joke to play on your friends after.

  • 7 - Jakester

    Sep 25, 2010 at 7:05 am

    I have just seen the movie on tv for the first ime and it was a good movie in my opinion. Opinions are held by everyone, and yours is a little cut throat. Almost to the point you have a hidden motive behind being so.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 22, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs