Movie Review: W.

Anyone who saw Nixon knows that Oliver Stone probably wasn't planning on doing a hatchet job on George W. Bush in his latest film. Stone seeks to understand his subjects, not forgive or excoriate them. However, anyone who saw Nixon may find that W., while a solid film, suffers by comparison.

The film cuts between Bush's first term and the road that led him there. It's a fascinating story. The family fuck-up becomes the 43rd President of the United States. If you were to sell it as fiction it would be a comedy (and the film is very, very funny at times). It's also an archetype, in Stone's interpretation. The black sheep, trapped beneath his father's shadow, seeks to win his approval by besting him.

This paradigm produces the film's weakest moments. The screenplay, by Wall Street scribe Stanley Weiser, relies on routine father/son conflict patter that wouldn't be interesting except for the fact that it's being spoken by Presidents. Not helping matters any is a sentimental score which, even if it's being ironically saccharine, is too much.

When it comes to politics, however, the screenplay crackles, with back room debates over everything from the Iraq War to the invention of the term "Axis of Evil." Rich monologues remind you of what made Wall Street so compelling.

The performances are top notch, though at first there's an almost inevitable SNL effect of perceiving impersonation instead of performance. Richard Dreyfuss however, leaves this perception in the dust more than most, fully embodying Dick Cheney. James Cromwell, on the other hand, takes a completely different tack, making no effort whatsoever to impersonate Bush Senior. He doesn't need to do Bush because in Stone's depiction, Bush is the archetypal patriarch-that-cannot-be-pleased so Cromwell just does that. Ironically, this approach makes for one of the strongest performances in the film.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for david-dylan-thomas

Article Author: David Dylan Thomas

David Dylan Thomas is a Philly-based writer/filmmaker/digital strategist who rambles about movies, technology, and culture at DavidDylanThomas.com.

Visit David Dylan Thomas's author pageDavid Dylan Thomas's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Lisa Solod Warren

    Oct 17, 2008 at 9:15 pm

    I thought the film was amazing..... and stunning in its performances, especially Brolin as W and Richard Dreyfus as Cheney... I was really surprised to find myself feeling quite, well, something, I am not sure what, for W., some sense of sympathy and not because of the whole father thing but because Brolin made him a complicated and believable character, more so than the real man himself seems. And I LOVED the soundtrack. I think Stone has a winner, if people don't go expected a fullblown comedy (from the previews) but sit and accept the film for its weird reality, Stone style, and appreciate the astonishing performances. I highly recommend it.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 21, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs