Movie Review: This Film Is Not Yet Rated - Page 2

Dick’s This Film Is Not Yet Rated shows a Kafka-esque world where my side of the battle has literally been having its ass handed to it for decades by the MPAA. It’s no surprise that the MPAA is a collusive, secret, corporate nightmare of hypocrisy, its founder, Jack Valenti, having come straight out of the Nixon administration. Every year I used to have to watch this now dead troglodyte get a mandatory standing ovation at the Academy Awards, and I’d cringe, but I have to hand it to him. The man was a master of Orwellian proportions, a man constantly throwing around hypocritical nonsense to the press, while running a secret organization one film expert in Dick’s movie refers to as fascist in nature. Not only that, he and his organization remain undefeated and barely challenged.

The beginning of Dick’s film shows a list of all the directors who have had to buckle under to the MPAA’s demand for them to edit their movies, and it reads like a hall of fame of modern directors. These are the greatest intellectuals cinema has to offer the world and their work is being edited by a secret panel of suburban parents who have absolutely no intellectual guidelines to do so other than what they find suitable to be seen in an American movie theater.

This is horrifying to me because next to television and possibly the Internet there is no other medium in America as influential on attitudes and social mores as movies. Dick’s argument also shows the numbing effect of the modern corporation. The MPAA was completely set up by the seven major film studios, and it continues to serve their purposes. In the movie, Matt Stone relates how when the board gave him an NC-17 for the movie Orgazmo, he was told that the board wouldn’t tell him what was deemed offensive at all, but when his major studio film South Park Bigger, Longer, and Uncut was rated he was given a list of what to cut to get an R rating.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2 — Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for brad-laidman

Article Author: Brad Laidman

Brad Laidman writes on pop, politics, and other less than vital issues. He blogs at Brad Laidman.com and is desperate for comments so that he will feel truly loved.

Visit Brad Laidman's author pageBrad Laidman's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Ty

    Oct 04, 2007 at 6:03 pm

    This was a neat film, it's just a shame that the film spent too much time on the lesbian PI instead of on the material. It was kind of a distraction.

  • 2 - Brent

    Oct 05, 2007 at 5:39 am

    Just a couple of facts from this review that desperately need correcting. The MPAA was not founded by Jack Valenti, it was created as the Motion Picture Producers and Distributors Association of America. The name was changed to the present one in 1945. As for Jack Valenti, he would be terribly insulted to have been accused of coming straight from the Nixon administration. He was a lifelong Democrat who worked for Lyndon Johnson and was so loyal it was said that if Johnson dropped the H-bomb Valenti would call it an "urban renewal project."

  • 3 - Brad Laidman

    Oct 05, 2007 at 12:03 pm

    Brent's comments are corrent - I meant to say he created the rating system not the MPAA and he did work for Johnson not Nixon.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 24, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs