Movie Review: The Expendables - Page 2

What is the mission? To overthrow the corrupt dictator, General Garza (David Zayas), who rules a remote South American island named Vilena. Once Barney and Lee make it to Vilena through a female contact, Lacy (Charisma Carpenter), it turns out that Garza is not entirely the man in charge. Rather the real villain behind the corruption is (excuse me while I bring up the other action guest list) rogue CIA agent James Munroe (Eric Roberts, in all his hammy, sniveling, cigar-chomping glory) who leads his own gang which includes his right-hand henchman, Paine (Steve Austin) and The Brit (Gary Daniels).

So why isn’t this film more fun than it is? Mainly because the dialogue in the screenplay by Stallone and his co-writer Dave Callaham starts to really clang. Of course, most of the B-grade action movies of the past did not contain the most scintillating lines either but there was a way in which many of those movies (intentionally or not) turned their cheesiness to campy fun by being so on-the-nose about the absurd plot and situations going all around them. This film has little to none of that and rather makes a poor attempt to make us "care" about the camaraderie of the Expendables and the seriousness of the mission, all of which are awfully trite and predictable.

In fact, the screenplay, which half the time is strangely consistent in conjuring up three-word sentences like “Are you crazy?” “Not so funny,” and “Let her go,” becomes so leaden that we just wait for something to blow up. Unfortunately, beyond the efficient opening scene, the action scenes (most of which are found in the last 30 minutes) only work in fits and starts. There are times when the close-up shooting and quick-cut editing is effective in trying to show how fast these guys can move, in particular the way with which Statham is quite handy with knives. Much of the time, however, that frenetic shooting and editing style becomes repetitive and reduces the action to a mere series of indiscernible kills.

Among the cast, Statham comes off best, as his character’s handy knife weaponry fits best with the film’s quick-cut style. Meanwhile, Stallone, probably with some Botox help, actually looks a lot better in this film than he did in the last Rambo, although some viewers will howl at the most violent scene in the film that is pretty much a direct replica scenario from Rambo. The one who gets the most shortchanged, however, is Jet Li. He is a good sport for his willingness to blend in with this all-American action gang (even at the expense of being the butt of jokes poked at his shorter height). But his more realistic wushu martial arts background does not mesh with the rest of the outrageous, '80s style action and Stallone does not know how to integrate it more into the action (which is likely why there is not much martial arts fighting at all). And truth be told, Jet Li was my favorite action hero from my childhood, which makes it all the more disheartening.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2 — Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for moviejohn

Article Author: moviejohn

Joo-Wang John Lee is a computer programmer at Binghamton University by day and a movie critic by hobby. Upon insistent suggestion from people around him, he finally decided to start critiquing movies in writing instead of just verbal form among his friends. …

Visit moviejohn's author pagemoviejohn's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Dustin Mac

    Aug 16, 2010 at 4:22 pm

    I don't think your review is fair. How is every review convinced this movie isn't "fun"? You can go f yourself as far as i'm concerned. That movie was a blast, I was literally high from watching that movie. I felt great afterward.
    It was a really cathartic movie to watch. I'm sorry your fav was Jet Li as a kid, I really am. So, because of your bias, that YOU made sure to admit, it seems you didn't give anyone else the time of day in the movie. I enjoyed many aspects of the movie, from the dynamic between the characters, to the action itself. I know its not going to win any awards, but what action movies have in the past? That is the problem with reviewers these days, they forget what movies are made to do. A dramatic movie is meant to move you, an "action movie" is meant to get you excited, take you on a ride. This movie delivered the ride so to speak. All I am saying, you cant judge this movie the same way you judge INCEPTION. Don't get me wrong, INCEPTION was a phenomenal movie on every level, and that is what I was expecting. With the action genre, specifically this one, Stallone promised a 1980's action movie, and he delivered exactly that as far as I'm concerned. And if your looking for anything else, you will rate a movie that had all your faves from being a kid, in ONE movie, mediocre at best. Review it for what it is, and I guarantee you will rate it better.

  • 2 - Sasshin

    Aug 16, 2010 at 9:06 pm

    This was a kickass movie.It had lots of action n was funny at parts.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 22, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs