Movie Review: The Break-Up and Friends With Money: Men and Women Without Qualities - Page 5

This last comment indicates, however, that even a born ironist like Holofcener may not entirely understand her gift. She puts stains on the characters' pants to make things look worse than we expect "reality" to look in a movie. If she thinks she's just trying to present a realistic view of women's lives, then she must also think that hangmen's nooses just grow from tree limbs. Her artistic approach is to overcompensate for other artists' prettified fantasies, whether she knows it or not. The inflictions she universally visits on the female characters of Lovely and Amazing are too horrible-funny to be real.

It's one thing to take women down from pedestals, which are so limiting anyway (in part because they require women to act as if they were incapable of farting), and another thing to stomp on their faces when they're on the ground. At times, Holofcener appears to dislike her female characters as much as Nora Ephron does, but because her movies, unlike Ephron's, are inexpensive independent productions she's not forced to fake nice about it. In Lovely and Amazing, Holofcener could be seen as Ephron's id, taking vengeance on women.

Herself included—Holofcener is no hypocrite. As she says to Salon, "I'm up there. I'm as repellent as everybody else. But somehow I can forgive myself, because I think, well, I know I'm repellent." But even though Holofcener says in this 2002 interview that she based Lovely and Amazing on her own family (albeit "very loosely"; she filmed many of the scenes in the house she grew up in), her comic imagination is so harsh, especially in that movie (with its gallows-trapdoor of a title), that she doesn't have enough invested in the characters even for irony. If the ironic protagonists' suffering is not deserved (and even the severest critics of female vanity would probably not agree that cosmetic surgery merits even a brush with death), then the movie probably needs a fiercer, tighter, or higher style than Holofcener has yet achieved. It may be the very sneaky-softness of her handling that led people to mistake her attitude in Lovely and Amazing for sympathy.

Holofcener does show a lighter spirit in Friends With Money. As she says to Salon, "As I get older, more mature, I learn to forgive myself my human foibles." Perhaps for that reason, however, the picture never comes together. She has gained in authority as a writer—the movie culminates without a dramatic climax at a charity fundraiser and you can make out an intended design—but apart from McDormand's outbursts, the material isn't memorable.

Continued on the next page Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4 — Page 5 — Page 6

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for alan-dale

Article Author: Alan Dale

Alan Dale earned a Ph.D. in Comparative Literature from Princeton University and a J.D. from Yale Law School. He currently works as a corporate tax attorney in Portland, Oregon.

He is the author of What We Do Best: American Movie Comedies …

Visit Alan Dale's author pageAlan Dale's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • Friends with Money Friends with Money

    THE STORY OF A SINGLE WOMAN WHO'S LOOKING FOR A MAN & WHOSE THREE BEST FRIENDS ARE ALL WEALTHY AND MARRIED.

  • Be Cool (Widescreen Edition) Be Cool (Widescreen Edition)
  • Return to Paradise Return to Paradise
  • Friends - The Complete First Season Friends - The Complete First Season
  • The War of the Roses The War of the Roses
  • The Awful Truth The Awful Truth
  • Casablanca Casablanca
  • Citizen Ruth Citizen Ruth
  • Lovely and Amazing Lovely and Amazing
  • Walking and Talking Walking and Talking

Article comments

  • 1 - Chris Evans

    Jul 30, 2006 at 9:00 pm

    Disagree with you about Aniston. She's an incredibly underrated actress. Yeah, she's no Nicole Kidman--you won't see her playing Virginia Woolf anytime soon, but when she's in the right role she's golden. I thought she was great in Friends With Money as well as in The Good Girl which is one of my favorite films of all time.

  • 2 - Alan Dale

    Jul 30, 2006 at 9:23 pm

    Thanks for the comment, Chris. I figured Aniston couldn't have made a zillon dollars per episode on Friends for 10 years w/o picking up a lot of fans. Actually, I like her better than Nicole Kidman, who strikes me as waxy and pose-y. I like Aniston in her range, it just strikes me as a small-screen range. The audience with which I saw Friends With Money clearly responded to McDormand more than to Aniston.

  • 3 - Chris Evans

    Jul 31, 2006 at 12:34 am

    Lmao! I loved Frances McDormand. She's brill in EVERYTHING.

  • 4 - Alan Dale

    Jul 31, 2006 at 8:17 am

    Best story about McDormand: early on, when she would get auditions for movie roles that specified the character had a full figure, she would show up with a pair of fake tits in a shopping bag.

  • 5 - Chris Evans

    Jul 31, 2006 at 11:58 am

    Dude, that's fucking hilarious!

  • 6 - Joan Rivers

    Aug 05, 2006 at 5:54 pm

    I couldn't agree with you more, Aniston has no range. She is more worried about her hair not being perfect than transforming fully into her character. She has never had any kind of acting ability, she should of been a hair dresser instead. She is cute but that's all she has going for her and that is slowly fading.

  • 7 - Alan Dale

    Aug 06, 2006 at 5:50 pm

    Ouch. Well, I like her a bit more than you do, but I certainly don't miss her between movies. And I never understood the appeal of Friends at all. Thanks for that energetic comment.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 21, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs