Instead, it's plain we're supposed to like Brooke and Gary and wish the best for them—no matter how stupidly they behave. It was thus a disastrous decision to flash the functioning years of their relationship in a montage of stills. We need to see what the relationship is based on if we're going to have any investment in the way it falls apart. Instead, the movie relies entirely on the audience's feelings for the stars.
As for the stars, Vaughn has the better role to the extent that Gary takes less of the infantile initiative and reacts more. Vaughn is in the enviable position of merely having to convey that Gary's feelings aren't what they appear to be. As he showed in last year's Be Cool, Vaughn is an ace at multiple roles within a single character. In Be Cool, Vaughn's Raji is a junior music exec posing as a white-boy-gangsta, i.e., a buffoon, but a conniving and even murderous one. Raji is a joke and he half knows it, which only gives his ludicrous lack of cool an unpredictable volatility. Vaughn makes Raji jumpy with the anxiety of someone trapped in a part that isn't working. You can see the eyes shifting behind the mask and Vaughn suggests these layers while playing the comedy at full tilt. As Raji, Vaughn manages to give essentially concentric performances, a prodigious act that went largely unnoticed.
I doubt there's another actor with comparable range who has gone as unrewarded as Vaughn. In Return to Paradise (1998), which features his most mature lead performance, he does the redeemed Bogart cynic with greater texture than Bogart himself (who was, after all, a creature of the studio factory system, with its limitations on form and substance). Vaughn is both more romantic and more believably self-protecting than the unflappable, tough-guy hero of Casablanca (1942) and To Have and Have Not (1944).
With his height, his broad, handsome face, and his watchful eyes, Vaughn has the makings of a great screen actor. And there are moments even in The Break-Up, particularly in a scene toward the end after Gary has blown off Brooke's conciliatory gesture and tries to talk to her, when his face is magnetizing. You witness the adolescent male feeling empathy for the first time and being spooked while understanding right away how important it is.








Article comments
1 - Chris Evans
Disagree with you about Aniston. She's an incredibly underrated actress. Yeah, she's no Nicole Kidman--you won't see her playing Virginia Woolf anytime soon, but when she's in the right role she's golden. I thought she was great in Friends With Money as well as in The Good Girl which is one of my favorite films of all time.
2 - Alan Dale
Thanks for the comment, Chris. I figured Aniston couldn't have made a zillon dollars per episode on Friends for 10 years w/o picking up a lot of fans. Actually, I like her better than Nicole Kidman, who strikes me as waxy and pose-y. I like Aniston in her range, it just strikes me as a small-screen range. The audience with which I saw Friends With Money clearly responded to McDormand more than to Aniston.
3 - Chris Evans
Lmao! I loved Frances McDormand. She's brill in EVERYTHING.
4 - Alan Dale
Best story about McDormand: early on, when she would get auditions for movie roles that specified the character had a full figure, she would show up with a pair of fake tits in a shopping bag.
5 - Chris Evans
Dude, that's fucking hilarious!
6 - Joan Rivers
I couldn't agree with you more, Aniston has no range. She is more worried about her hair not being perfect than transforming fully into her character. She has never had any kind of acting ability, she should of been a hair dresser instead. She is cute but that's all she has going for her and that is slowly fading.
7 - Alan Dale
Ouch. Well, I like her a bit more than you do, but I certainly don't miss her between movies. And I never understood the appeal of Friends at all. Thanks for that energetic comment.