Movie Review: The Art of the Steal

A small African American college becomes the beneficiary of a rich man’s will, but evil forces—political and social and even petty personal—converge to take away a multi-million dollar art collection from the small college, destroy an educational institute connected with the foundation the rich man built while dismantling probate law in the state of Pennsylvania. That’s the gist of the 2009 documentary, The Art of the Steal.

The movie isn’t just about politics in an Eastern city. USC was the beneficiary of Walter Annenberg, whose donations helped establish the Annenberg School of Communication from which I received my master’s degree in print journalism. Annenberg’s father was at the center of a tax evasion scandal and when rich men fight, their money talks. Annenberg was the publisher of the Philadelphia Inquirer and he held a personal grudge against Albert C. Barnes, the man who set up the Barnes Foundation and left it to the first degree-granting historically black Lincoln University in Merion, Pennsylvania.

A self-made millionaire, Barnes was scorned by the Philadelphia establishment for his questionable taste (“horrible, debased art”) during a public showing of his collection, but as tastes changed, people began to want access to his remarkable collection of post-impressionist art which includes Pierre-Auguste Renoir (181), Paul Cezanne (69), Henri Matisse (59), George de Chirico, Paul Gauguin, El Greco, Francisco Goya, Edouard Manet, Amedeo Modigliani, Jean Hugo, Claude Monet, Pablo Picasso, Maurice Utrillo, Vincent Van Gogh, Maurice Prendergast, and a variety of African artworks.

Barnes, who died suddenly in 1951, meant his foundation to be a school for the study of art and his will expressly forbid the lending of works, touring or selling. The public was allowed admission to the collection twice a week.

Barnes had taken great care with his will, knowing what had happened to the John G. Johnson Collection despite the stipulation of the 1917 will codicil that the city maintain the collection in Johnson’s South Broad Street home. In 1933, the entire collection was transferred to the Philadelphia Museum of Art and by 1989, the museum integrated the galleries of the Johnson collection with the museum’s own holdings.

With Annenberg using his newspaper, politicians and supposedly non-profit organizations fought for this $25 billion collection using legal and bureaucratic reasons that this documentary refutes. Along the way, a judge was fooled, the terms of Barnes’ will—written by the best lawyers of his day—was slowly dismantled and Philadelphia looked to fill its city coffers with the potential tourist dollars that could have gone to Lincoln U.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2
Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for purple-tigress

Article Author: Purple Tigress

Former theater critic for the LA Weekly and Los Angeles Times . For the last five years, an editing slave at a dot-com but recently laid off. Currently an under-employed freelance writer and artist.

Visit Purple Tigress's author pagePurple Tigress's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 19, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs