The first two Terminator movies are considered classics of the sci-fi genre, and so they rightly should be. Although I tend to classify the first one as a tad on the overrated side, it's still good, and the second one is most definitely an astonishing achievement in the genre, one that has rarely been matched since its release in the early '90s.
The third in the franchise was a big letdown, and although fun, was nothing compared to what had come before it. So now we have the fourth instalment in the franchise, which is essentially both a sequel and a prequel (try and wrap your head around that one), and it finally gives us the war with the machines that we've been told about for three movies now. So does it live up to its hype, the quality of the trailers, and the potential? Well, sadly, no. It's undoubtedly entertaining but when it comes down to it, it's just a movie about blowing stuff up... and not much else.
Terminator Salvation is set in a post-apocalyptic world in the year 2018, a time when the war between man and machine has already begun and the world is ravished by destruction and endless battle. The group of people defending against the machines, controlled by Skynet, are known as the Resistance and are led by John Connor (Christian Bale). When trying to find a way to disable the machines and end the war forever, Connor comes across a man (Sam Worthington) whose last memory is of being executed while on death row. Connor must decided whether to trust this man when a revelation about his true nature becomes apparent, all the while trying to lead the Resistance against the machines.
The main concept of the first three Terminator movies involved an entity, man or machine, being sent back in time to help or hinder John Connor. It would have been pointless to continue that on with Salvation, simply because we've been there and done that. So they finally give us the war we've all been wanting to see in full swing, and like a child in a playpen, we want what has been taken away from us. Not exactly back to the back in time storyline, but we want the heart and soul that the first two had, the feeling of empathy and humanity. It is sadly lost on Salvation. Director McG (I find it hard to utter his name without snickering) really knows how to blow stuff up, but that's about the extent of the intelligence of the movie; it's shoot first, asks questions later, all action, all the time. There's nothing remotely deep about the proceedings, and it's something that, in a rare case for a sci-fi action franchise, is badly needed.







Article comments
1 - Dustin Lerch
I like the review man...and I agree with some of it but others I don't really agree with. But...that's the beauty of movies...not everyone is going to agree. I agree that Sam Worthington stole the show from everyone. I thought he was fantastic. But...for me...I got exactly what I wanted and expected out of Salvation. That's why I gave it such high regard. I got the storyline and the just of what's going on in the first two films. With this film I wanted to see the war...I wanted to see the battle between man and machine. I didn't need a great big storyline...I needed the action...the fighting...the blowing stuff up. That's what this movie for me was about...it was about the war. I will say something else to though...going back and re-watching the first 2 films after watching this helped me big time. It filled in so many gaps in the storyline. It had been a while since I had seen the first 2 films so a lot of the storyline I had forgotten...that was helped by re-watching the first two films. If it's been a while since you watched the first two films maybe it would help you too. It also put ideas in my head of what we may see in the film/films to come. Great review man...keep them coming