Movie Review: Silent Hill - Page 2

This portion of the film has been criticized as illogical, but it makes sense to an audience raised on video games. The scene in which Rose reaches into the mouth of a corpse to pull out a tile bearing the name of a hotel, for instance, mimics the act of looking for clues in an adventure game. These games are by their very nature "illogical" because characters are motivated by a logic specific to the game that doesn't necessarily make sense when transposed onto real life. In an adventure game clues allow the player to advance through the narrative, and here they permit Rose to move forward through the plot.

Critics have also focused on the scene late in the film in which Rose enters a hospital room and the screen abruptly, shockingly fades to white. Sharon's doppelgänger Alessa (also Jodelle Ferland) congratulates Rose in voiceover for successfully "following her clues" to get to this far. An extended sequence, marked by grainy footage and bits of leader, explains the film's back story. This scene struck many critics as out of place, coming so late in the film, but gamers are familiar with exposition, in the form of a cutscene, being used as a reward for successfully navigating a portion of the game.

Sometimes Silent Hill's attempts to mix the aesthetics of gaming and movies don't work, such as the unnecessarily long scene in which Rose memorizes a map of the hospital basement. Ocassionally watching Silent Hill feels like watching someone else play a video game, with the attendant feelings of helplessness and boredom. Gans is to be commended, though, for trying to imbue his film with spirit of the material he's adapting.

The latter part of Silent Hill explodes with the fury of an arthouse horror flick. A bloodbath set in a church, it melds the anti-Catholic intensity of Luis Buñuel with imagery reminiscent of Frida Kahlo. It also serves as a cathartic release for the tension created by the film's sinister invocation of religious motifs. Only a horror film can reduce an entire universe of societal unease into a single scene of orgiastic violence, and in this regard at least Silent Hill must rank as one of the genre's most memorable entries.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2 — Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for a-horbal

Article Author: A. Horbal

The author's name is Andrew Horbal. He blogs about film criticism at No More Marriages! and writes about film for Lucid Screening and PopMatters. He thanks you for your time and consideration.

Visit A. Horbal's author pageA. Horbal's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - getitstraight

    May 03, 2006 at 7:49 am

    you wrote: anti-Catholic intensity of Pier Paolo Pasolini WRONG

    is that why he made the most prized catholic movie of all time? get your facts straight.

  • 2 - A. Horbal

    May 03, 2006 at 11:30 am

    Do you mean The Gospel According to Saint Matthew?

  • 3 - Duane

    May 03, 2006 at 11:57 am

    Haven't seen the movie, haven't played the game. But that was a fascinating review. I have also wondered why creepy kids in movies are so effectively scary. Interesting points also about trying to maintain logical consistency in a movie where the story is illogical to begin with. Most, if not all, horror movies ask us to abandon our common sense and logic for a couple of hours.

  • 4 - Rodney Welch

    May 03, 2006 at 11:58 am

    Horbal -- I can't speak for getitstraight, but he does raise a question as to why you say "anti-Catholic" when it comes to Pasolini. Were you possibly thinking of Bunuel?

  • 5 - A. Horbal

    May 03, 2006 at 12:50 pm

    Well, clearly it has to change if it's raising this many questions.

    I was thinking specifically of The Gospel of Saint Matthew, which I've always considered something of a slap in the face to the aristocracy of the Vatican. By stripping the Gospel of Matthew down to its bare essentials, Pasolini is reclaiming Christ for the poor, for the political. The minimalism of this film stands in stark contrast to the pomp and circumstance of Catholic ritual.

    The excess common to many of his other films is a rebuke to the strict, formal customs of the Catholic country in which he lived and worked. There's an anger and intensity directed at the leaders of the church that expected the people to follow these rules, but didn't follow them themselves. His films both celebrate life and lampoon those who would presume to dictate how it should be lived.

    For better or for worse, that's what I was thinking. Buñuel is probably a much better, much more intelligible choice. Thanks!

  • 6 - congfused

    Mar 24, 2007 at 6:00 pm

    im so lost when did the mom and the daughter actually die?

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 22, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs