Movie Review: Partition - Page 2

The production values were all right, but little things like the indoor sound miking was bush league. I couldn't clearly make out some of the Neve Campbell's lines indoors. I wouldn't have used Campbell as a Brit, for starters. I can't say she's really impressed me in her film career. Given that this was a Canadian co-production, I'm not surpised to see her and thank goodness they didn't use Sarah Polley, but you'd think they could have found someone with a better accent.

All the Indian actors were excellent, although, since their characters were not developed much, many of them came across as mere stereotypes. Dhirendra, known for starring in the Canadian television Jinnah crime movies, shows up as Sharma while Chenier Hundal, who co-starred in another Vic Sarin film, 2005's Murder Unveiled, plays one of Naseem's brothers. Vinay Pathak, one of the best Indian actors, plays the rotund village businessman in Partition, and he played the corrupt police inspector in Murder Unveiled as well as the transvestite in Water.Overall, this film is ultimately about two people who saved each other and the struggles the faced to stay together, in the face of strong religious intolerance. Not a feel-good film but a rather sad one and a decent but not superb, drama.My rating for this film is .

Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for triniman

Article Author: Triniman

Almost weekly, Triniman catches new movies, and adds one or two CDs to his collection. Due to time constraints, he blogs about only 5% of the CDs, books and DVDs that he purchases. Holed up in the geographic centre of North America, the cultural …

Visit Triniman's author pageTriniman's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Prashant

    Sep 29, 2007 at 2:30 am

    You do realize that british rule in India ended not 300 years ago but just 60 years ago. in 1947 not in 1747. That my friend was the american independence though that still was 1764 or something. Just a thought on the validity of your article and how interesting this movie must have been for you, for you to get that wrong.

  • 2 - Dr Dreadful

    Sep 29, 2007 at 2:52 am

    Prashant, you misread it. Go back and read the opening sentence again.

  • 3 - SFC SKI

    Sep 29, 2007 at 7:23 am

    The opening sentence is very clear. Thanks for the review, I doubt I'd have heard about this film otherwise. The Partition is a little known or understood event for most Americans, and we should become more familiar with it before we consider a similar partition plan for any other country.

  • 4 - kick it

    May 09, 2008 at 3:59 am

    Even worse than a know it all is the nay-sayer who doesn't even have his or her thoughts processed before spouting off at the mouth. Maybe it would be a good rule of thumb to go back and read again before making a critique.

  • 5 - Spartan

    May 01, 2009 at 11:50 pm

    Ouch

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 13, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs