Wittgenstein is often accused of toppling the walls of philosophy, his spattering of the truth function, the writhe and wiggle of propositions, the fundamental essence of elements; with his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus he said a big “Fuck you” to his contemporaries still floating around in the bubble of Hegel, or making chili sauce over Hume’s circular reasoning in induction. He undermined an entire scholarly area with his pronunciation that that which is not overtly fathomable to the human mind, namely certain mystical and emotion phenomena, is simply beyond utterance. An enfeebling of the very things that philosophy was and is about. His rigid logic, often verging on mathematics, lays claim to arranging a way, the only way, that we can theorize life and existence.
With his final line of wisdom a flaming trident straight to the heart of epistemologists and meta-physicists was felt everywhere: “What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.” Sounds rather obvious that thought outside of human cognizance, the thoughts never thought, are not going to be able to be mentally postulated. However the heavy fists of Manny Kant and Freddy Nietzsche would certainly rip that flaming trident out of the weeping minnows and hit back with a powerful blade of ontological reasoning and the very foundational principles of intellectual inquiry.
Well the very intransigence that Steven Seagal is able to insinuate from his pouting corneas and greasy ponytail in Out For Justice is similar to the hardened math-logic of Wittgenstein. Seagal carries the conceptual notions of tautology in formulations of p and q with exemplary ease of adaptation, his relentless pursuit underlines the very ideas of an understandable logic, truth functions brought real, as his altruism never once weakens. Steven Seagal is best known as a martial artist, movie star and musician, but people all too often forget to add the label of philosopher into that cacophony of definition.
Out For Justice, Seagal’s third motion picture, has a plot of intense complexity, the sort of winding narration and symbolic imagery to make Tarkovsky’s The Mirror look like The Pacifier. Pay attention to each of the following syllables here because it may be easy to lose the thread of explanation. Seagal’s a cop, his name is Gino Felino, his partner is killed, Seagal goes to get revenge.





.jpg?t=20130517094513)

Article comments
1 - Tan The Man
"Out For Justice, Seagal's third motion picture, has a plot of intense complexity, the sort of winding narration and symbolic imagery to make Tarkovsky's The Mirror look like The Pacifier."
Hilarious!
2 - Victor Lana
I don't care what the critics say. Movies like this and First Blood and Diehard tap into a universal something that I just enjoy. Oh, and the bad guys get their asses whipped. Enough said.
3 - Paul Roy
This was actually Seagal's fourth film - sorry, I used to be a huge fan up through this one, seeing that I was just starting out with Aikido and all. I love this movie, and it is worth seeing just for William Forsythe's insane performance as Richie, Gino's chilhood friend from the neighborhood, turned crack addict, psycho killer.
4 - Aaron Fleming
Ah Paul, you're absolutly correct, my mistake.
5 - Aaron, Duke De Mondo
Sir Fleming, as i stated on Mugwump, this is just sublime. my face hurts wi the laughter invoked by this mercillesly brilliant line;
"Seagal would later go out again, in both Out For Reach and Out For A Kill, who wants to stay in anyway?"
hells fire.
and also, this;
"did I mention that the bad guy is from the old neighborhood, and that he and Seagal have a history? Oh yes, things aren't quite so black and white here, I see at least three tints of yellow and maroon cascading across my television set right now."
hahaha god almighty