Movie Review: Lions for Lambs - Page 3

Lions for Lambs is an indictment of the government and the media, and shows how everybody pays for decisions that are made. We even get a bit of the blame placed on America in general as we have become too complacent to fight for anything. Pretty much everything in the film is a point that is believable, if arguable. The problem is that for a 90 minute film it is all talk. Seriously, this movie is all about the talk. Talk, talk, talk.

It starts off potentially involving as each of the players is intriguing in their own right, but I kept waiting for something big to happen. They just kept talking, and talking, and then the movie was over. So, without much going on beyond the talk, any interest is going to lie with the star power. To a degree it works. Cruise has the smarmy politician down, Streep is fine as the conflicted reporter, and Redford has a laid back charm as he tries to start a fire. Pena and Luke carry the heart of the movie and represent the only characters that I actually cared anything for.

Bottom line. I did not feel that this movie broke any new ground and did not succeed in telling us anything that we didn't already know. The resulting product amounts to a lecture. Did I like it? To an extent, I just wish that there was more to it. It survives on the strength of the stars and the conviction with which they bite into the roles.

Mildly Recommended.

Page 1Page 2 — Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for chris-beaumont

Article Author: Chris Beaumont

Christopher Beaumont spends much of his time writing about music and movies when he isn't indulging in them. He is always ready to talk about his favorite form of entertainment and offer up recommendations. Follow: Twitter and Tumblr. Visit: Critical Outcast. …

Visit Chris Beaumont's author pageChris Beaumont's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Taffe

    Nov 13, 2007 at 12:30 am

    Patrons are voting with their feet, and opting not to attend and support movies like this . Hollywood needs a reality check. Movie goers don’t want this type of entertainment.

  • 2 - bliffle

    Nov 13, 2007 at 10:00 am

    The reviews I've read have all said that it's too preachy. Too didactic. I surmised that it's a leftist movie converse of an Ayn Rand novel.

    Sounds boring.

  • 3 - Cha Cha

    Nov 19, 2007 at 12:39 am

    This movie was very excellent movie. It's a very sad thing when american rather not here about the truth or watch what's happening to us as a country. I believe EVERY AMERICAN needs to see this movie.

  • 4 - Triniman

    Nov 19, 2007 at 12:38 pm

    I found it preachy with too much dialogue. Still, it may be the first film that points the finger also at the media for enthusiastically selling the war to the public.

    Hollywood churns out endless crappy films that few people want to see. Despite "voting with their feet," these films continue to be made. Hollywood has never gotten the message because just enough people see these rotten films.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 29, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs