Movie review: Leo - Southern Gothic

Author: MulePublished: Jun 12, 2010 at 8:07 pm 0 comments

This is an ambitious movie. It starts as Stephen (Joseph Fiennes) is released from prison. The very first scene we see him in will tie in nicely with the last scenes of the movie, so there's a cyclical movement here and two timelines that twist together nicely. We get to see the story unfold in more or less chronological order, interspersed with the chronological events of the story's "now". There is also a voice-over letting the viewer know that the past is being retold in literary form as a book that Stephen is writing.

The past is as intricate as the present. It's safe to say that Stephen's relationship with his mother Mary (Elisabeth Shue) is a complicated one. His father Ben (Jake Weber) and his younger sister die on the night of his birth. His mother is convinced that Stephen is the result of an adulterous mistake she made with the handyman Ryan (Justin Chambers) in desperation when she thought her husband was being unfaithful to her. She sees him as her punishment and treats him accordingly.

In a way this is a perfect Southern Gothic tale, complete with a huge decaying Southern mansion, rich in connotation for anyone who has read their Faulkner and Poe. There are a lot of conventions in play, both in the first timeline and in the second one. What saves it from being no more than a quick game of cliché bingo is the performances from Fiennes and, above all, Elisabeth Shue. Shue delivers a complex and nuanced performance as a woman on the verge of a nervous breakdown, and later as the embittered alcoholic bent on self destruction.

After the death of her husband, Mary (Shue) keeps up the relationship with Ryan and it becomes increasingly abusive and violent. It all culminates one night when it escalates to the point where young Stephen steps in with a frying pan and kills Ryan. The subsequent trial is painful to watch, Mary does not step up and defend her son's actions, instead consigning him to fifteen years in prison. To add insult to injury it's actually at the trial that she finds out that Stephen is her husband's son. She has been punishing him his whole life for no reason. Stephen takes the fifteen years as his due, and tells his mother that they can finally be done with all this now.

What I realize as I'm working on this review is that there is a lot of content here. The story is also told with a specific visual sensibility, all very crisp and clear and obviously very carefully thought through. There are some interesting choices when it comes to the colour and feel of the visual aspects. There are also visual representations of the literary voice-over that try to illustrate the imagery of the words. And it works really well, even if it feel a little overly artistic at times. Like I said in the opening paragraph, it's a very ambitious movie.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2
Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for mule

Article Author: Mule

Mule watches a lot of movies. Mule has also studied movies at university level, which means Mule does not only blithely blither on about liking or not liking stuff. Well, not entirely blithely anyway.

Visit Mule's author page

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 22, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs