Movie Review: First 28 Minutes of 28 Weeks Later

by Andrew Kasch

If you've had the misfortune of stepping into a movie theater over the past three months, you're probably feeling pretty down on the current horror scene. Rest assured, folks. Good things are on the horizon.

As a show of good faith, Fox invited Dread Central out to their studios to screen the first 28 minutes (get it?) of the most anticipated film in their Fox Atomic catalog, 28 Weeks Later.

So what's the verdict? Well, all notions of this being some contrived studio cash-in were dashed within the opening minutes. Danny Boyle and Alex Garland are obviously going to great lengths to make sure this film is a mature follow-up rather than collect their "executive producer" paychecks, and it looks like they've found a great successor in director Juan Carlos Fresnadillo. If the rough footage screened is any indication, 28 Weeks Later looks to be even more epic, tense, and character-driven than its predecessor. In fact, those that disliked the original 28 Days for its Romero-inspired trappings will be surprised to find that the sequel extends into much fresher territory.

As much as we'd love to tell you every juicy detail of what we saw, we're bound to some level of secrecy here. First 28 Minutes of 28 Weeks seen!But here's a basic run-down of what was shown (beware of minor spoilers):

The film opens with a blistering infected attack on a group of survivors during the events of the original film. Title cards give us a timeline following the starvation and demise of the infected. Cut to... (drum roll) 28 weeks later: With the virus seemingly gone, authorities have turned London into a military zone and are beginning the process of re-population. Survivors are checked in through medical tests and background procedures before being herded into apartments in temporary "safe zones". It is here, we assume, that all hell will break loose. Robert Carlyle (in top form) takes on the role of the tortured protagonist who is trying to rebuild life with his family, and the gritty hand-held style of the original perfectly sets up the ruined aftermath of the infected apocalypse.

When the lights came up, we could all safely say that we were very impressed, and this writer is more anxious than ever to see the final product. Keep your eyes peeled right here as news develops.

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for dread-central

Article Author: Dread Central

Dread Central is the premier website for breaking news, original content and active community in the world of horror, covering movies, DVDs, games, collectibles, live events and music. If it's got something to do with the dark and horrific, you'll find …

Visit Dread Central's author pageDread Central's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • 28 Days Later (Widescreen Edition) 28 Days Later (Widescreen Edition)

    Hailed as the most frightening film since The Exorcist, acclaimed Director Danny Boyle's visionary take on zombie horror "isn't just scary…it's absolutely terrifying" (Access Hollywood). ...

Article comments

  • 1 - Chris Beaumont

    Mar 25, 2007 at 4:45 pm

    Saw the trailer for this the other day, and I amped to see it! I loved the firsy film. It's too bad Cillian Murphy isn't back...

  • 2 - Jim Beam

    Apr 03, 2007 at 5:29 am

    Love the first film this has got to be better!!!

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 30, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs