Django Unchained is brutal, sickly comic, and often hard to watch. That being said, it’s also a smart film about racism and slavery, 
masterfully crafted by talented filmmaker, Quentin Tarantino. A late arrival during 2012, Django Unchained should be in the conversation for best picture of the year, if critics can get past the excessive gore and racist language. Tarantino crosses the boundaries of what is comfortable in order to shock, amuse, and drive home a powerful message into your brain — and he succeeds completely on all counts.
This satirical revival of the blaxploitation genre tells the story of a bounty-hunting dentist who frees a slave named Django (Jamie Foxx) in order to help him track down his latest reward. Feeling responsible for the man he freed, Dr. King Schultz (Christopher Waltz) teaches Django how to shoot, read, and even promises to help him free the woman he loves from a rich slaver, Calvin J. Candie (Leonardo DiCaprio).
The romance between Django and his bride, Broomhilda Von Shaft (Kerry Washington), is one of the weaker aspects of the narrative. However, the relationship between the former slave and Dr. Schultz is surprisingly deep for a Tarantino movie; their mutual growth serves to push the plot forward.
The story unfolds in a series of episodic acts, each feeling like their own stand-alone arc. This approach is something fans of Tarantino are likely accustomed to, though I will add that it works better here than in Inglourious Basterds.
At first it isn’t clear just where Dr. Schultz’s ethics lie, but he’s soon revealed to be quite an enlightened man in a world gone to hell around him. Although he pretends to be a slaver during the course of his duties, the dentist (who never touches a tooth) betrays his character more than once, showing compassion for the abused men and women around him – abuse which can be quite intense.
The level of cruelty committed by men in this movie is hyperbolic but never melodramatic. Yes, Tarantino uses violence to entertain, but that doesn’t mean it can’t also be used as a powerful tool for emotional depth. In my opinion the excessive violence serves the themes well, with a perfect blend of blood-fueled comedy and some downright disturbing moments that enraged me immensely.
Article comments
1 - Al Barger
Chad, I don't really see how this movie was much tongue in cheek, give or take the proto-Klan scene with the bags. But other than that, one of the particularly interesting points of this movie to me as a Tarantino film was the mostly deadly serious dramatic tone.
As a particular point, I note the usage of the N word - which you could not reasonably avoid. But he's much more serious and careful here than in his other movies about how he uses the word. There's simply nothing here equivalent to, for example, the "dead nigger storage" schtick from Pulp Fiction.
Also, I don't think you're giving him proper credit for the drawing of the Calvin Candie character. He's morally one dimensional, which is simply to say that he has no redeeming or mitigating moral virtue. But there's a lot of good detail in his intellectual pretensions, a lot of which is summed up in someone who likes to be called Monsieur Candie - but can't speak French and will resent it if you do.
And how was that ending NOT climactic? Yowsa!
I don't know about being THE coolest Western ever made - cause there's a lot of competition for that. But Django is right up there among Westerns and among Tarantino movies.
2 - pol
Django's Vengeance