Movie Review: Basic Instinct 2

Who thought this would be a good idea? And why did I decide to spend an evening with it? I don't think that I can answer those questions. I should have known, based on the avalanche of bad reviews, but then who listens to critics?

I walked in knowing this would be bad yet, like a moth to a flame, I found myself at the counter uttering the words "Basic Instinct 2," as I handed over my hard-earned money. The theater's lobby was packed with people out for a night at the movies. Perhaps I would at least have a jazzed crowd to watch it with, but no. I entered the auditorium to find but a handful of people peppered throughout. I guess all of those bad reviews worked in keeping people away. In any case, I settled down in my seat and waited for the festivities to begin.

The film opens with the most excitement you're going to get. Sharon Stone, reprising her role as Catherine Tramell, speeding through the empty night streets of London with a drugged-up man for a passenger. She leads him into an activity that probably isn't terribly well advised while driving 100+ mph. With the empty streets, I was wondering if this could be a part of the world of V for Vendetta, but this film isn't that smart. Anyway, Tramell winds up crashing the car off a bridge into a river. The man dies, and the story, such as it is, is off to the races.

Tramell is arrested and assigned one Michael Glass, played in stoic fashion by David Morrissey as the shrink, to determine how much of a threat she is. The game picks up when she starts with the mind games, attempting to out-shrink the doctor. The doctor, meanwhile, is buying right into it. Then more people start dying and everyone is a suspect. Blah, blah, blah.

I honestly found myself not caring about anything. There was no tension, mystery, or sensuality. The acting was awful on all fronts, the dialog was laughable (and judging by some of the reactions in my small crowd, it was hilarious), and the score was annoying. There was nothing to like about this movie.

Our two leads, Stone and Morrissey, have one look and one tone of voice apiece. Everything is taken so deadly seriously that the comedy is unintentionally increased. The best way to describe it is "constant constipation." Stone, with her plasticine face, probably didn't have enough control of her facial muscles to muster more than that pained look of an aging seductress. Then there is Morrissey who isn't much better - he is completely forgettable. I felt bad for David Thewlis and Charlotte Rampling. They have both been in good projects in the past, and are pretty much wasted here. They are abandoned by the poor script and inept direction.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for chris-beaumont

Article Author: Chris Beaumont

Christopher Beaumont spends much of his time writing about music and movies when he isn't indulging in them. He is always ready to talk about his favorite form of entertainment and offer up recommendations. Follow: Twitter and Tumblr. Visit: Critical Outcast. …

Visit Chris Beaumont's author pageChris Beaumont's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Earl

    Apr 02, 2006 at 5:46 pm

    Never saw the first one. I guess I'm just out of the loop, or I really don't care about Hollywood.

  • 2 - Greasy Guide

    Apr 03, 2006 at 6:37 pm

    I LOVED THE MOVIE! Ms. Stone was as sexy as ever and she still has it for an old broad. I don't care what the box office was the movie was good.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 19, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs