Mickey Mouse at 75

Happy birthday Mickey - cultural icons aren't created every day:

    Mickey Mouse arrived on the world's cultural stage 75 years ago Tuesday as a scrawny but buoyant black-and-white product of the Jazz Age.

    He was a symbol of American pluck in his screen debut, "Steamboat Willie," on Nov. 18, 1928. The film at New York's Colony Theatre showed an irreverent rodent who takes Captain Pete's steamboat on a joyride and woos Minnie Mouse by making music on the bodies of various farm animals.

    The years have dulled Mickey's personality, a result of him becoming the corporate face of a multibillion-dollar entertainment empire. In the process, Mickey also has become a cultural Rorschach test -a symbol of American optimism, resourcefulness and energy or an icon of cultural commodification and corporate imperialism.

    "There are a number of qualities Mickey represents on which people like to stick their particular view of the world," said Janet Wasko, a University of Oregon professor and author of "Understanding Disney: The Manufacture of Fantasy."

    For Roy E. Disney, whose uncle, Walt Disney, created the character, Mickey Mouse is "'this friendly little guy,' which were Walt's words for describing him."

    For Penn State professor Henry Giroux, however, Mickey Mouse represents the vast reach of American cultural power, symbolizing a company that has turned childhood into a function of consumerism as children feel obligated to purchase the latest "Finding Nemo" DVD or Mickey Mouse watch.

    "Mickey Mouse offers up a ... symbol of innocence while hiding the role it plays in commodifying children's dreams and extending the logic of the market into all aspects of their lives," said Giroux, author of "The Mouse That Roared: Disney and the End of Innocence," a cultural critique of the company.

    ...."Mickey Mouse speaks an international language," Sklar said. "When I go to Tokyo and see how kids react to Mickey Mouse the same way they do in Paris. It's reassuring that there are some things that cross international boundaries."

    Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for eric-olsen

Article Author: Eric Olsen

Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.

Visit Eric Olsen's author pageEric Olsen's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Jim Carruthers

    Nov 18, 2003 at 5:02 pm

    Free the Mouse!

    It isn't the belief in cultural imperialism I have a problem with, it's the practise. Believe what you want.

    Have you read Ariel Dorfman's "How to Read Donald Duck"? As a Chilean who faced US political imperialism first hand with the overthrow of a democratic government and the installation of a murderous dictator, he is somewhat qualified to comment on some cartoons.

    From The Empire's Old Clothes: What the Lone Ranger, Babar, and Other Innocent Heroes Do to Our Minds


    The Americans wanted ... the spoils of empire, but were not ready to assume the excruciating dilemmas that went with the knowledge of what they were imposing upon others. They desired the power which can only come from being large aggressive, and overbearing; but simultaneously only felt comfortable if other people assented to the image they had of themselves as naive, frolicsome, unable to harm a mouse.

    [snip]

    Mickey does nothing more than go the way of all North American mass culture. He joins power and infantilization, expands his influence and at the same time retain (or regains) ingenuousness, lords it over everybody, and lets an innocent smile disarm all criticism.



    The best example of Disney's cultural imperialism, is that they remove chunks of the public domain from around the world and give them a life copyright sentence in the United States (Pinocchio, Snow White, Cinderella, The Jungle Book, Winnie the Pooh, and so son).

  • 2 - Al Barger

    Nov 19, 2003 at 2:34 am

    I can't defend their abuses of law for extending copyrights, but I will otherwise largely defend Disney. People are buying buttloads of the Finding Nemo dvd because it is a really outstanding movie, not because there's a mouse with a gun at their back.

  • 3 - Eric Olsen

    Nov 19, 2003 at 8:14 am

    AS I stated above, I hate the hypocritical extension of copyright law, which in Disney's case as Jim rightfully states, means the swallowing of previously existing public domain characters and preventing anyone else from using them. This is foul.

    But this is completely separate from the quality of their products, which is remarkably high over time, and from the desirability of those products in the world marketplace. If people like the, they like them - "cultural imperialism" is a sham concept.

  • 4 - Jim Carruthers

    Nov 19, 2003 at 4:20 pm

    Actually, Al, "Finding Nemo" is a Pixar film (distributed by Disney). Pixar (headed by Steve Jobs) has soundly trounced Disney at their own game.

    I just got the Looney Tunes Golden Collection, and one of the mottos of "Termite Terrace" where the Warner's animators worked was "Don't be like Disney". For the most part I haven't really liked Disney cartoons, too cutsy, infantile and straining to prosyltize a mythic USA which may be conforting to it's citizens, but is smothering to others.

    And it is called marketing, you don't force people to consume, you entice them, you flim-flam them, you sell the sizzle not the steak, you fleece the rubes, you give them a man eating chicken.

  • 5 - Al Barger

    Nov 19, 2003 at 5:12 pm

    Flim-flam and sizzle might make A sale, but for repeat business over many decades, you have to have a good product.

    Whoever exactly was hired to do it, Nemo is a Disney product ultimately, and has much more a (in the best sense of the phrase) touchy-feely Disney tone than anything to do with Looney Tunes.

  • 6 - Jim Carruthers

    Nov 19, 2003 at 6:39 pm

    Good grief, Al, Pixar is a studio, they create their own movies from start to finish (Toy Story, TS2, Bug's Life, Monsters Inc., Finding Nemo). They have a contract (like many other studios) with Disney to distribute the finished product. Disney has nothing to do with the creation of the movies, they just distribute them.

    Disney is in competition with Pixar, and the contract is coming up for renewal. Pixar has Disney over a barrel because all of the recent Disney productions have come up way short. And Pixar are negotiating to take their next movie (The Incredibles) to the highest bidder unless Disney picks up the option.

    If distribution is all that counts to make a product Disney, what are you going to do with David Lynch's "The Straight Story"? Distributed by Disney, but if you think David Lynch is Disney, then you're just being willfully obtuse.

    Given the concentration of media ownership and the convoluted intertwinings, it is impossible to say who owns or creates what.

  • 7 - Eric Olsen

    Nov 19, 2003 at 7:30 pm

    Yes, yes, Pixar is a separate studio Disney had the good sense and taste to hook up with. This doesn't change anything about the other 70 years of great stuff from Snow White to The Little Mermaid. They've had their ups and downs like any creative entity, but the cream is as good as any other set of cream in existence. That's why Disney is as popular as it is, marketing is only delivery.

  • 8 - Jim Carruthers

    Nov 19, 2003 at 8:14 pm

    One of the keys to Disney's success and longevity is their market is primarily children, which means they have a constantly renewing and expanding market. They can sell the same item over and over to a new audience.

    That is why Disney restricts the distribution of their core properties. Pre-VCR, this meant releasing their movies theatrically every 7 years.

    A similar approach is seen in their marketing of the theme parks. Now they are marketing to parents with a nostalgia hook, bring your kids, and relive your childhood.

    It isn't just Walt who's frozen in time.

  • 9 - Evan

    Apr 07, 2009 at 11:54 pm

    well um if there is a House of Mouse there should also be a House of Bunny and when i say bunny i mean Bugs Bunny who is kind of like Mickey Mouse

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 09, 2010

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs

Upcoming Stories from Blogcritics
  •