Love Actually

I rented Love Actually last week and watched it with my girlfriend. The film, released at the theaters last year, was not even my fourth choice. But when one is in a relationship, one finds themselves having to make compromises. In this case, the compromise turned out to be a pleasant surprise - though my girlfriend did fall asleep halfway through.

Anyway, as I watched the fairly complex plot threads slowly weave their way towards a predictably syrupy conclusion, I found myself contemplating this film a bit more than expected. I'll try to cover the bases without boring readers to death.

First and foremost, Love Actually boasts an extraordinary cast of actors, many of whom are from Britain, the location of this valentine of a movie. Hugh Grant, Emma Thompson, Liam Neeson, Alan Rickman, Laura Linney and Colin Firth, among others, lend an air of respectability to the mainly light proceedings. This ensemble piece examines eight varieties of relationships, all of them involving a form of love.

You have love between a father and son, love between a Prime Minister and house employee, love between a long-time married couple, love between co-workers, love between two long-time friends, love between porno stand-ins and love between a writer and housekeeper. I'm sure I missed a relationship somewhere in this very busy film. If so, forgive me.

Richard Curtis wrote and directed this romance/drama/comedy, and it was his first time behind the lens. His previous work included the charming screenplays to Four Weddings and a Funeral (a favorite of mine), Notting Hill and Bridget Jones' Diary. After such notable success with the pen, I suppose it was about time for him to sit in the director's chair. He does an adequate job with a fairly daunting screenplay. Not only must this story weave in and out of the lives of 10-20 individuals in modern-day London, but it must walk a fine line between comedy and drama, giving each notable actor enough screen time to flex their professional muscle.

Curtis wears his heart on his sleeve in Love Actually, and that is not always a good thing. The film is radically uneven, and does not necessarily come together with satisfying panache. He bats about .500, but when he does make a hit, it is indeed a home run.

The misfires are many, as the budding love between the already-mentioned porn stand-ins strikes the harmonious note of a wooden nickel. This talkative pair, in various forms of undress, pretend to perform lustful sex acts while cameramen set the lighting meters prior to the actual actors doing their "business." The odd couple make a date and literally shiver during their first kiss. The symbolism is too obvious - yes Richard, we know lust and love are two entirely different things. The film comes to a standstill during these vignettes.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Justene

    May 12, 2004 at 3:57 pm

    I liked the film a lot. However, the porno standins gave the film an unnecessary R rating while adding little to the film. It could have done much better at the box office without that line.

  • 2 - Chris Kent

    May 12, 2004 at 4:03 pm

    Justene,

    I agree the porn-stand-in vignette did little to advance the respectability of the film. It was out of place and added much to the film's uneven nature. As for vignette giving Love Actually an R rating, to me it doesn't matter because the film's appeal was mainly to adults anyway. That was why I wrote about the film, there's really not enough such films for adults today. It was an enjoyable surprise.

  • 3 - Justene

    May 12, 2004 at 5:28 pm

    Still, many adults will prefer a PG-13 rating. Personally, I rarely go to a suspense film rated R and skipped Man on Fire for that reason. I don't enjoy the graphic violence. Many other adults (older, religious) don't enjoy the nudity or sexual references.

  • 4 - Chris Kent

    May 12, 2004 at 5:53 pm

    Nudity and sexual references don't bother me, and certainly have their place in the right film. Love Actually was probably not the most appropriate film for such references. The most sexually explicit references were the vignettes that failed and were most out of place......

  • 5 - katie

    Nov 09, 2005 at 5:44 am

    Question: In the end of the movie do you think that Alan Rickman and Emma Thompson have gotten a divorce or are they still together?

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 20, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs