Lost: The Beginning of the End Arrives

Part of: TV Nights

I, as much as anyone, have complained about television series finales. I seem to recall having written about the disappointment I've felt at the closure of television shows on more than one occasion. I wasn’t someone who disliked the last episode of Battlestar Galactica, but there have been more than one series which I've felt cheated by when they turned off the lights. While I wouldn’t suggest that some shows have an easier time in creating their finales, there are series that certainly have an incredibly difficult battle to do it correctly. One need look no farther than Lost to see how true that is.

Last night, as many are aware, Lost began its final season. While the series' numbers aren't what they were earlier in the show's run, Lost is still a cultural icon and has, as a bandleader said back in the day, got some 'splainin' to do.

At this point in the series, as was pointed out to me last night, there are a ton of questions. (and here we get into spoilers). There are people out there who seem happy that the show finally answered the question of the black smoke – it's actually Jacob's non-friend who has made himself look like Locke. That may sound like an answer initially, but that's not an answer, it's about a half-dozen more questions (as noted in the aforementioned article). Who is Jacob? Who is the other guy? How does he turn into the black smoke? Why does Jacob have guards? Why do the two guys hate each other? Who over the course of the series that we've thought was one person has actually been this other guy? The list goes on and on. How are they possibly going to clear this up by the end of May?

I'd like to suggest that they shouldn't – they shouldn't bother explaining everything.

Oh, I'm not saying that they shouldn't take some time to sketch a general picture, but they shouldn't go into everything. I have to figure the executive producers are smart enough to understand that. As much as some out there may want a great deal of hand-holding, it seems to me that it would be better if we didn't get that. If you've stuck with the show this long, surely you want don't want some dumbed-down explanation that makes you feel like a fool, right? A general picture would be far better — everyone then can have their little ah-ha moments when they work out for themselves what this, that, or the other meant. To take us down the path and show us each little flower along the way is to not treat the viewer with respect.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for josh-lasser

Article Author: Josh Lasser

Josh Lasser, formerly known as "TV and Film Guy," and complete with a Masters Degree in Critical Studies in said areas, gives his opinions on TV, Film, and Entertainment in general. All of which he does in a shameless attempt to try to get paid to do the exact same thing. …

Visit Josh Lasser's author pageJosh Lasser's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Victor Lana

    Feb 04, 2010 at 5:16 pm

    Josh, I agree with you about this. I was thinking for a long time that I wanted ALL the answers, but that would be about as much fun as "American Idol" without Simon.

    I think you have to leave the ambiguity in there. Explain some of the stuff (like the black smoke and maybe even the polar bears), but I do hope that it doesn't become a case of connecting all the dots.

    What will be fun when it is all over is our neverending attempt to connect all the dots. If they do it for us, why even bother buying all the DVDs?

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.