J.J. Abrams and Joshua Jackson on the Fringe of Science in New FOX Series

On Tuesday, September 9, FOX invites television fans to “imagine the impossibilities” as the hotly anticipated new show Fringe makes its debut. Fringe takes its title from the branch of science outside the mainstream, on the cutting edge of what is known and believed possible.

It’s an area of great interest to executive producer/co-creator and writer J.J. Abrams, and as his track record shows, what interests Abrams tends to interest the rest of us. Fringe’s Abrams, Alex Kurtzman, and Roberto Orci are the team behind Star Trek, Mission Impossible III and Alias, and Abrams also has hit shows Felicity and Lost to his credit. He and series star Joshua Jackson (Dawson’s Creek, Bobby) chatted via conference call about science, fiction, and the grey area between the two.

J.J. AbramsThe session led off with a question about the relevancy of today’s political landscape to the show. Abrams denied any specific context, but said, “Every week we read or hear or see about some kind of potentially horrifying scientific breakthrough. The reality is that we are in a time, whatever party is leading the country, where science is out of control. Having said that, maybe everything is out of control.”

Given that the show has a shadowy and ambiguous corporation playing a role, Abrams was asked whether he was trying to make any particular point about corporate culture. Abrams responded that he’s always found large powerful organizations dramatically appealing, because “it’s hard to believe that there isn’t some kind of interesting, compelling intrigue happening behind the doors of those corporate headquarters." He confirmed that we’ll be hungry to learn more about the people behind Fringe’s mystery company.

With the show sitting at the intersection of science and fiction, the inevitable question is how far the show’s grounding in real fringe science will be stretched. Abrams explained the show’s stance:

When we did the pilot for Lost, we had the monster appear at the end of the first act. We did that very consciously because we wanted to say to the audience, “We’re jumping the shark now,” like we’re doing crazy stuff from the beginning. We’re not going to wait. On Fringe, we very consciously did what is in many ways a preposterous, out there, far-fetched scientific story point in order to say to the audience, "This is what you’re going to be getting on the show." Now it may be more extreme in some cases, less so in others.
Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for gerry-weaver

Article Author: Gerry Weaver

Gerry loves film, books, a few television shows (House, True Blood and Lie To Me come to mind), and writing about them.

Visit Gerry Weaver's author pageGerry Weaver's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 10, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs