Is YouTube Making the TV Tower Obsolete?

Earlier this week, Marshall Kirkpatrick wrote about KZSW, a local TV station in Temecula, California that has started uploading news and sports clips to YouTube so that its viewers can watch them online whenever they want to. It means that viewers can now easily find and watch the clips that they used to have to request from the station, and they can take advantage of the features that are already built into YouTube - channel subscriptions, viewer commenting, video embedding, permalinks, etc.

Mathew Ingram of webpronews says it's a no-brainer, and I agree completely. While it's not uncommon for local sites to slap the odd video clip up on their home page, it's a lot more difficult to upload several clips a day and archive the old ones so that users can find them easily. The saving in bandwidth costs and website maintenance alone would make this worthwhile for a small station.

It will be interesting to see if other TV stations follow KZSW's lead. If they do, it will be interesting to see whether YouTube will treat these stations the same as they've been treating individual users, or if they'll start to charge them for the huge bandwidth that it will inevitably require as more and more stations take advantage of it.

The challenge here — and it always seems to come down to this — is how to keep advertisers happy and how to create some revenue with the free online video you're offering. Viewers who go to YouTube to watch KZSW's clips are putting money in YouTube's (Google's) pockets, and KZSW's options for advertising during a 5:00 clip are limited. Pre- or post-roll ads are an option, but advertisers would have to be assured of a significant number of local viewers in order for it to make sense.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for eric-friesen

Article Author: Eric Friesen

Eric lives in Winnipeg, where most days it is probably not as cold as you think it is.

Visit Eric Friesen's author page

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Marshall Kirkpatrick

    Jan 22, 2007 at 11:16 am

    I agree that excitement is very appropriate. :)

  • 2 - Eric F.

    Jan 22, 2007 at 2:25 pm

    Thanks, Marshall, and all the best with the SplashCast launch later this month. I signed up for the beta access the other day and am looking forward to checking it out.

  • 3 - Bliffle

    Jan 22, 2007 at 11:26 pm

    You'll ruin your eyes watching that youtoo crap.

    Instead, dump your cable, dump your satellite and go HDTV with that old UHF tower. It's free because it's Over The Air (OTA). And it exists because the FCC requires that EVERY analog TV station MUST also transmit a digital signal or lose it's valuable FCC broadcast license. The license itself is worth over $100million. The digital signal is required because the FCC wants to grab those valuable analog spectra and resell them to Cingular, etc., and require analog OTA customers to use the new DTV via an adapter. The picture and sound are vastly better. And all you need to buy is a $100 Set Top Box (STB) receiver for your old TV. The STB receiver is already builtin to your new TV that you bought in the last couple years. The price will soon be down to about $20 for a STB receiver.

    And your eyes won't start bleeding when you turn the TV on. And your wallet won't bleed green at the end of the month.


    All from that old UHF tower!

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 29, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs