Hobbit Heavy Petting

Peter Jackson's unequalled masterpiece fantasy achievement of a thrice-blessed trilogy, Lord of the Hugs, er, Rings was the ultimate realization of the fabled Tolkien story. (Or is it storied Tolkien fable?) That hulking beast of a narrative will not have to suffer interpretation again until some new medium is invented, like when we all start watching little plays produced by tiny nano-Peter Jacksons, nano-actors and nano-costume designers who'll live in the nano-Hollywoods we'll all have implanted in our optic nerves by Sony.

The universally lauded epic had only one fairly major flaw. It had...what must be...the longest...most drawn out... epilogue...in the...hissss-tory of cinema. Almost like, everyone involved knew that they had done such a good job that no one would mind sitting through a 25-MINUTE POSTSCRIPT!

Much of this lengthy coda was taken up by — there's nothing else for it — a hobbit hug orgy. After being rescued by giant eagles from the rock in the middle of Mt Doom's lava river, Frodo awakes in a soft-focus fluff cloud of a bed. After a few choice words with a weirdly giggly old Dame Maggie Smith, er, Gandalf the Wizard, he's accosted by his two giddy hobbit buddies in a cringe-worthy slow-motion hug frolic...in bed.

I wish Gollum were here.

For an eternity it seems, minutes even, Frodo and Pinkus and Marty, or whatever their names, are in full-out fur-flying hug-o-rama-lama, while one-by-one the rest of the Fellowship, the adult faction, wander in, to leer regally at the spectacle of these child-like creatures coming this close to losing it and getting it on — whatever it is that hobbits might do.

Should we be watching this?

Gimli, the strapping dwarf, is first, and seems to be casting his gimlet eyes with a special appreciation for frolicking with smooth hobbit flesh — that which is not covered by fur, that is. He's been there, it appears.

Then comes Legolas, the elf, and the only one in the room who looks remotely — or legally! — huggable...since he's also the one that most resembles an actual GIRL.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Aaman

    Jul 26, 2005 at 1:41 pm

    Funny, enjoyed the spin - of course, our Duke De Mondo has had similar thoughts in the past - the Sam/Frodo connection is deep

  • 2 - Eric Olsen

    Jul 26, 2005 at 2:14 pm

    thanks Billy, very nice - there's a lot of damn hobbit-hugging in that extended denouement

  • 3 - Bennett

    Jul 26, 2005 at 2:21 pm

    Nice laughs, this is. I agree with your son. Way to much license was taken at the end of the story.

    Wholesale hug-and-cry-o-ramas, but none of the great stuff from the third book.

    No "Rousing of the Shire", man I was pissed off at that. Instead, we got weepy weep.

    Feh!

    Bennett

  • 4 - Nancy

    Jul 26, 2005 at 2:31 pm

    Oh, & I thought I was the only one in the world thought there was too much sweetness & light in ROTK. Thank god!

  • 5 - Temple Stark

    Jul 26, 2005 at 3:55 pm

    :-0

    Of course, you forgot the new imminent stage version.

    No, seriously.

    I envison, appropriately, another "Ring of The Nibelung" (a la Wagner)

  • 6 - Nancy

    Jul 26, 2005 at 4:02 pm

    ...a ... a STAGE version? What next, LOTR On Ice? Maybe I should have rooted for the bad guys after all...?

  • 7 - Eric Olsen

    Jul 26, 2005 at 4:43 pm

    don't forget the puppet version - but will they be able to rise to the vertiginous level of Thuderbirds?

  • 8 - Temple Stark

    Jul 26, 2005 at 5:06 pm

    The Thuderbirds fell flat. You must have meant something else :-)

    Thunderbirds are go !!!

  • 9 - Eric Olsen

    Jul 26, 2005 at 5:15 pm

    hee hee - Freudian slip?

  • 10 - Phillip Winn

    Jul 26, 2005 at 5:28 pm

    Billy, don't let your insecurities spill out so publicly next time.

    There, there, it's okay. Want a hug?

    :-)

  • 11 - Eric Olsen

    Jul 26, 2005 at 5:34 pm

    those advocates of the Hug Principle should keep in mind the lessons presented in "Of Mice and Men"

  • 12 - bhw

    Jul 26, 2005 at 5:35 pm

    All I remember is the Looney Tunes version: "I want to hug him and squeeze him and call him George."

  • 13 - Eric Olsen

    Jul 26, 2005 at 5:37 pm

    exactly: he didn't mean to squish the (insert small furry creature here)

  • 14 - Tan The Man

    Jul 26, 2005 at 7:21 pm

    Most of my friends hated that scene. But I liked it because I felt it was really that rare moment in the entire trilogy that everyone was at peace. After what turned out to be an almost 10 hour epic, how could you not appreciate the serenity of knowing that your friends survived alongside you. I'm getting chills thinking about it.

  • 15 - Eric Olsen

    Jul 26, 2005 at 7:27 pm

    that's a good point too, Tan

  • 16 - Bennett

    Jul 26, 2005 at 7:49 pm

    Yeah, but in the book, the return to the Shire is where Merry and Pippen show some of the steel they earned in battle, and a very poignant confrontation with a much reduced Sauruman (Sharkey).

    One of my favorite "post Mt Doom" moments.

  • 17 - Eric Berlin

    Jul 26, 2005 at 7:52 pm

    I sat through RoTK for the first time during a midnight showing and had had about three hours of sleep the previous night, working on my grad school thesis.

    I was like, Come On Already!

  • 18 - Natalie Davis

    Jul 26, 2005 at 7:56 pm

    I liked the hug scenes for exactly the same reason. Made for a great time to weep tears of joy and relief; my son and I both hugged and cried throughout. Still, given a choice, I would have rather seen the Scouring of the Shire.

  • 19 - Eric Berlin

    Jul 26, 2005 at 8:00 pm

    Was is Scouring or Razing ?

  • 20 - Natalie Davis

    Jul 26, 2005 at 8:17 pm

    Scouring.

  • 21 - Eric Olsen

    Jul 26, 2005 at 8:22 pm

    me too, that's where we found out that part of the "purpose" of the great journey was to prepare the other three hobbits to lead the Shire beyond the idyllic, passive provincialism of the past and to take charge of their own destinies.

    I understand the time and attention constraints facing Jackson, but the absence from the movie of any ass-kicking back home was my only real disappointment with the whole trilogy

  • 22 - Aaman

    Jul 26, 2005 at 8:26 pm

    Yep, returning war heroes cleaning out the closet (and local heroes) might have been a bit uncomfortable, perhaps:)


    I read the LOTR once a year or thereabouts, and generally feel misty-eyed when the ships sail for the West

  • 23 - Eric Olsen

    Jul 26, 2005 at 8:33 pm

    unlike most modern myths, it's a myth that is actually mythic

  • 24 - RJ

    Jul 26, 2005 at 10:06 pm

    I agree with the original post. I loved the entire trilogy (watched it all in one sitting, on DVD, all nine hours or so worth). But the last half-hour or so of the last movie was so...lame.

    All we saw were hugs and tearful goodbyes. Are these hardened warriors, fresh from a great, incredibly violent, victory over pure evil? Or are these weepy pussies, possibly all homosexual, who want nothing more than to grasp each other in special places and plant sloppy wet kisses on each other?

    Epilogues should be brief, not endless and treacly. That is, if anything, the one failing of this magnificient trilogy.

  • 25 - Aaman

    Jul 26, 2005 at 10:24 pm

    Anyone else see the google-ad up there "Frodo has failed:The Fellowship failed - Bush has the ring - free t-shirts,cards and stickers"

    Funny - never thought of John Kerry as a hobbit

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 11, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs