To put the problem with this film succinctly: Jude Law doesn't sweat.
A fantastically bland revolution explodes on the screen in Kerry Conran's "Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow". A fascinating mix of Fritz Lang, Ray Harryhausen and Robert Wiene, Sky Captain takes us to the retro-future of the twenties and thirties, where giant robots menace daring aviators and sinister and unseen forces plot to take over the Earth. Dirigibles dock on the spire of the Empire State Building (it was originally built for that very purpose, in fact) and everything is moody, dreamlike- and incredibly CGI.
The film is notable, because it was filmed without sets and with a tiny cast, who acted entirely against green screens. The result is actually kind of unique. The composited double and triple images feel like cinematic collage and you've never seen anything like it.
The problem, however, is that all this fabulous imagery and stylization is shoe-horned into a rather boring plot with lackluster characters. The usually likable Jude Law plays the eponymous Sky Captain, Joe Sullivan as a tough guy who really knows how to thrust out his chin. That actually makes him sound more appealing than he really is. Suffice it to say, we like Indy not because he's a hero, but because he's a wiseacre. While Law's character's lack of self-conciousness is true to the time period that the movie is emulating, audiences expect more from their heroes than just swagger and smile.
Gwyneth Paltrow plays the smart working girl reporter, but without any of the charm or ease that Jenifer Jason Leigh managed when she played a much better written version of the same role in the Cohen Brother's "Hudsucker Proxy".
I bring up the Cohen Brothers movie, not just because the two film are trying to create the same style, but because "Hudscucker" has what "Sky Captain" desperately needs: pacing and charm.








Article comments
1 - Eric Olsen
very nice Japhy, thanks - it very interesting to see the frames of reference in reviews: you are asking for logic and charm