Film Noir Thursday #3: Out Of The Past

Part of: Film Noir Thursdays

After one rather disappointing film (M) and one very solid if not spectacular film (Laura) I'm now on the third film in my Film Noir Marathon, Out Of The Past. Made in 1947 and directed by Jacques Tourneur, it's based on the novel Build My Gallows High by Daniel Mainwaring, who also wrote the screenplay. It's considered one of staples of the film noir genre. Roger Ebert sums up the critical response with "Out Of The Past is one of the greatest of all film noirs". Below is my review, and of course a list of remaining films.

The film starts out not with a bang, but rather a slow build up. We see a stranger later identified as Joe Stephanos (Paul Valentine in an amazing role) asking questions about a man named Jeff Bailey who runs the local gas station in a small town. The tone is relaxed, far from a startling murder intro or high speed chase. Soon we meet Jeff Bailey as he comes back from fishing with his romantic interest, Ann Miller (Virginia Huston). The man asking questions is a long-time acqaintance of Jeff's who works for mobster Whit Sterling (Kirk Douglas in an early role). He tells Jeff that Whit wants a meeting with him, and Jeff agrees.

For the next 40 minutes or so as Jeff and Ann are driving a long, winding road to see Whit, we hear the story (told in flashback and narrative) of Jeff Bailey's (actually Jeff Markham's) previous life — how he's connected to Whit, a girl named Kathie (Jane Greer) who he was supposed to find and return to Whit, only to fall in love with upon seeing her, and her subsequent disappearance. We find all this out as he tells it to Ann in an attempt to get his past off his chest and hopefully move on once and for all, that is, after he goes and settles things with Whit.

While the plot is certainly notable, by far the best one of the films I've watched so far, the real satisfaction comes in terms of the acting and dialogue. Both are top notch in this film. Robert Mitchum, who really should have been a much bigger star, is great as Jeff Bailey/Markham. He's in a sense the essence of cool here — not letting his emotions rule him whenever possible, cynical and suspicious, but not without his own set of morals. His world-weariness is astounding, especially considering he was only 28 when he starred in Out Of The Past. A lot of the time he's being played by someone higher up and he's also usually aware of it all. It's a testament to his acting that he makes being used seem slick.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for cameron-graham

Article Author: Cameron Graham

Cameron Graham is an enthusiastic critic, passionate about art in all its expressions.

Visit Cameron Graham's author page

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • Out of the Past Out of the Past

    Former private detective Jeff Bailey is trying to live a quiet life but his past comes back to haunt him. He was once hired by a gambler to find his runaway girlfriend Kathy. Jeff traced her to Mexico and fell in love. ...

Article comments

  • 1 - Scott Butki

    Jul 14, 2006 at 9:43 am

    FYI - I'm gonna catch up. I received this movie today as well as Laura from Netflix. I'm not going to read your reviews until I watch them this weekend.
    But first I'm going to watch the Third Man.

  • 2 - Gordon Hauptfleisch

    Jul 14, 2006 at 10:17 am

    Good call--one of my favorite movies. Also one of Mitchum's, as is mentioned in the biography "Robert Mitchum: Baby, I Don't Care"(one of my all-time favorite book titles).

  • 3 - Scott Butki

    Jul 17, 2006 at 11:25 pm

    Received this one by Netflix today and am going to watch it tomorrow.

  • 4 - Scott Butki

    Jul 20, 2006 at 8:18 am

    WAtched this last nite. I'll post my thoughts on it tonite.

  • 5 - Cameron Graham

    Jul 20, 2006 at 10:30 am

    Sounds good.

  • 6 - Scott Butki

    Jul 20, 2006 at 7:48 pm

    Watched this last nite and was blown away. As I wrote in the topic on Third Man I read a bunch of reviews of this movie today - those of the NY Times, Ebert, etc.
    It's universally praised as one of the best noir movies with snappy sharp dialogue,
    a great flashback
    and the only noir movie to have both a deaf mute
    character and a person killed by a fishing rod.

    The only criticism - which I share - is the movie
    does get confusing in the last 30 minutes or so when it's easy to lose track of just what is going on.
    I think it was the NY Times review that suggests
    an abacus or calculator is needed to keep track of
    what's what and whether its a double cross, quadruple cross or whatever.

    I'm watching the dvd commentary track tonite to see if it helps sort things out.

    The acting performances are amazing.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 29, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs