Empire names Braveheart (1995) worst Best Picture - Comments Page 2

The British film magazine Empire has named Mel Gibson's Braveheart the worst Best Picture Oscar winner, maintaining that writer Randall Wallace's dialogue for the film "has all the thudding subtlety of a parody."…
Read comments below, or read this article from the beginning.

Article comments

  • 26 - El Bicho

    Sep 01, 2005 at 2:25 am

    Tan, care to elaborate?

    Bob, there's no way I could do a Top 10 list. I would have enough trouble doing a top 10 by decade or genre. Do you want films before '75? Skip the Best Picture list. Most don't stand up over time.


  • 27 - Eric Berlin

    Sep 01, 2005 at 2:28 am

    I've always found Braveheart to be a very exciting and emotionally satisfying film, so to me it holds up better than many other Oscar winners.

    I mean, The Last Emperor is a visually stunning film, but does anybody really want to sit through that thing again?

  • 28 - Tan The Man

    Sep 01, 2005 at 2:57 am

    Well, both Titanic and Braveheart are well-made films, but in the realm of film history and achievement, both lag far behide their counterparts. Did either deserve their Oscar awards? Is Braveheart as good a movie as say Saving Private Ryan? Does Titanic hold up to Gone With The Wind? I don't think so. Braveheart was up against Apollo 13, and Babe - and Dead Man Walking wasn't even nominated. Because Titanic won 11 Oscars, does it equal the quality of Ben-Hur, which also won 11 Oscars. I just think that the quality doesn't hold up as well. Maybe my cynicism for recent oscar winners makes my opinion bias. Who knows?

  • 29 - Derrick

    Nov 19, 2005 at 8:47 pm

    What about Shakespeare in Love? I found it both unbelievable even on a liberal comedic level and ultimately forgetful.

  • 30 - Chuck Crane

    Mar 09, 2006 at 9:58 am

    Braveheart did lay it on a little thick. I mean, did Wallace really boink the Pricess of Wales? And let us not omit that inane shout "Freedom!" I have it on good authority that Wallace really said, "F__ you, Longshanks!"

    It would be interesting to analyze what makes mediocre, ephemeral flicks get these awards. I suggest (1) Pious, didactic films (Chariots of Fire [which should have been on the list], Ordinary People, Beautiful Mind) get an edge because Hollywood dweebs want desperately to dispel the perception that they are shallow dimwits, and foolishly think that giving awards to these "thoughtful" films will do that; (2) Spectacles get an edge because of a child-like fascination with action on a grand scale, coupled with an adult's appreciation for the difficulty involved in putting spectacles together.

  • 31 - bikram

    Oct 20, 2007 at 1:31 pm

    titanic should top the list

    braveheart doesnot deserve this list,one can learn from this - " PATRIOTISM "

  • 32 - El Bicho

    Oct 20, 2007 at 2:49 pm

    Bikram, have you seen all the best picture winners? While I understand people don't care for the story and characters, I can't fathom why the film gets no credit for the skill it took to create the boat-sinking sequences.

  • 33 - anticeltandaussiekiwi

    Jul 10, 2008 at 12:14 pm

    See url

  • 34 - Kim

    Oct 27, 2008 at 2:01 pm

    Empire's list is pretty absurd and arbitrary. Field of Dreams was so terrible, though....

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 09, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs