Despite its flaws, The Wrong Man has good performances, technical kudos, and great touches that stick in the viewer’s mind long after it ends; such as the rote and unwavering way the female witnesses identify the real robber, then are ashamed to look at Manny as they leave, an early shot of Manny leaving The Stork Club, bracketed between two cops as he walks away, or his recalling the cop car in front of his house when he is let out on bail and sees an empty spot in the street. These are the things that show that a great artist, even when not at his best, is still better than most non-great artists at their best. And that’s the sort of claim for which no twist ending is needed.
"A sinister cabal of superior writers."
.jpg?t=20130517094513)
Article comments
1 - Josh Lasser
I think your characterization of his films as having "tended to lack heart, or real human emotion" is completely off-base, the real stories aren't the capers and heists and twists, they're the characters and interactions between the characters. The rest is just his "maguffin."
2 - Dan Schneider
The stories are plot-driven. Hitchcock was not dep. You won't find the great characters of a Fellini nor Bergman in his films.
Even Kurosawa, who was more action-oriented, developed characters. Hitch was technically great, but skin-deep.
3 - Ray Ellis
Granted, The Wrong Man was one of Hitchcock's more forgettable films. But that doesn't negate the fact your review of it is way off base in a number of areas. The movie was made in 1956, yet you cite it as being unrealistic in that the police didn't advise the suspect of his rights. Miranda warnings weren't put in place until 1966, a full decade after the movie was released. Comparing The Wrong Man to Serpico is like comparing Charlie Chaplin to Woody Allen, with whom you're obviously enamored. Fellini and Hitchcock are likewise apples and oranges. If you don't know the fundamental difference between film noir and "neo-realism", you have no validity as a critic. Your Eurocentric bias merely betrays you as a person who has no working knowledge of what makes a film work or fail. Hitchcock understood that film is a visual medium, and utilized its visual nature to wordlessly leave it to the viewer to draw his own cathartic conclusions. Fellini, Bergman, Rosellini--all have acknowledged their debt to Hitchcock.
Please--if you're going to review film, get a basic knowledge of it as a storytelling medium.
4 - Dan Schneider
Ray: I state, 'which was so manifestly incompetent in this and so many other pre-Miranda Warning cases.'
I am aware of the Miranda warning's date, as stated above. Were you aware that, pre-Miranda, NY state required the reading of a state's rights for defendants? That was my reference, since it was set in NYC.
'Comparing The Wrong Man to Serpico is like comparing Charlie Chaplin to Woody Allen, with whom you're obviously enamored. Fellini and Hitchcock are likewise apples and oranges.'
Here is what I wrote, 'The film displays their bumbling idiocy in full, and while it is not the flat-out criminality that engulfs the officers of the later film Serpico.' I am comparing the officer's actions, not the film itself. It's a simple matter of reading what is written.
'If you don't know the fundamental difference between film noir and "neo-realism", you have no validity as a critic.' Film noir is not character- but plot-driven. This is clearly Neo-Realistic in intent. In the DVD, even, it is stated Hitchcock was deliberately aping the Italian Neo-Realists. But, one need only see the film to see that. It is not a film where the crime is first, but the social message. Have you even seen the film?
'film is a visual medium, and utilized its visual nature to wordlessly leave it to the viewer to draw his own cathartic conclusions'
Every tool of the visual art serves one purpose- the telling of the story- aka the plot and the characters. Without the story, all else is window dressing.
Keep reading, you may learn something yet of film.
5 - Dan Schneider
'Fellini, Bergman, Rosellini--all have acknowledged their debt to Hitchcock.'
And learnt from his flaws.
6 - Ray Ellis
The word you're looking for is "learned", not "learnt". There is no such word as "learnt" in modern English. Of course, I wouldn't expect you to know that, wrapped as you are in lengthy dissertations that have nothing to do with the merits of film. I was hoping your review of "Colossus: The Forbin Project" was a misdirected view of what constitutes science fiction. It's become increasingly apparent, however, that you are so immersed in a stringently narrow view of what film is about that you like the sound of your voice. You're full of indignation, but you signify nothing.
7 - Dan Schneider
Actually, you are right that learnt is the older version, but you are wrong in knowing it's not acceptable.
Of course, from someone who reads, 'The film displays their bumbling idiocy in full, and while it is not the flat-out criminality that engulfs the officers of the later film Serpico,' then writes, 'Comparing The Wrong Man to Serpico is like comparing Charlie Chaplin to Woody Allen,' and cannot discern I am comparing the officer's actions, not the film itself, it's to be expected.
Leave wordplay to the pros.
Look, there's a bird. Ain't it pretty? Now, just wipe that drool off your cheek.
8 - Dan Schneider
It's a conspiracy against you, Ray.
Hitch is chuckling.
9 - JDCanada
"deus ex machina ending" . . . lol
10 - Dan Schneider
No laughs needed if you've watched the film and understand the term.