DVD Review: South Park: Bigger, Longer and Uncut - Page 3

It seems very befitting that our first century of film ends with the release of South Park in 1999. In the 1920s, the Hays Code was established on account of a few celebrity sex-scandals, and was industry regulated as a compromise to government intervention on behalf of lobby groups. The code, based on self-censorship, wasn't abolished until the 60s and was replaced by the rating system we know today.

Perhaps what has driven groups to demand mass media regulation has a lot to do with fairness. Mass media forms like film have a large impact, and they do tend to perpetuate myths and push certain ideologies, but centralized ownership does not facilitate a dialogue between these different ideas, and simply holds up a few of them. It's no wonder people fear the power that mass media can have.

That's why it seems suited that the twentieth century be capped off by the most offensive Hollywood film about censorship in mass media. Especially since a new problem is being posed for the twenty-first century in the form of fragmentation and the internet.

But this isn't the only aspect of the film that stands it in good stead. Of particular note is the use of animation. The Simpsons gave the 90s an all-ages satire with openness about family relationships, but South Park is what broke with common decency.

Traditionally, animation has been a kids' genre in the west. Disney musicals held a virtual monopoly on the animation genre ever since Snow White (1937), and it has only been since Pixar that the lead characters haven't sung and danced. The choice to make South Park a musical harks back to the tradition, but the material invites us to think critically, and by this stylistic choice, the film asks us if these old films are as innocent as we remember them. The traditional Disney film often featured black and white, good/evil dilemmas and you can only wonder if they really are appropriate for children.

Another aspect of note is the voice work. Terrence and Phillip are voiced by Matt Stone and Trey Parker. Asses of Fire, the movie within a movie, stands as a self parody. A musical number about cursing and farting. This pretty much summarizes how those who haven't seen the film would think of it. As the drama escalates, it is as though the authors admit that there are people who are going to oppose and persecute them for the film.

Continued on the next page Page 1Page 2 — Page 3 — Page 4

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for jonathan-scanlan

Article Author: Jonathan Scanlan

Jonathan Scanlan is currently employed as a market research interviewer after graduating with a Bachelor of Arts. His distaste for the sweet things in life has led him to savour those things that genuinely nourish the body and mind, as well as cultivate …

Visit Jonathan Scanlan's author pageJonathan Scanlan's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Sterfish

    Apr 23, 2006 at 12:03 am

    Excellent, spot on review of that movie.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 14, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs