DVD Review: Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup (2009)

On the 27th of February, 1933, the building that housed the German Parliament caught fire. The Reichstag Fire, as it became known, was set by one individual. The Nazis used this to take control of the entire country. On December 7, 1941, Japanese planes attacked and bombed American ships docked at Pearl Harbor. Though the US government knew that there were plans for an attack somewhere in the Pacific, they didn’t know the time or the location. The Americans used this attack to enter into World War II.

On August 2, 1964, an erroneous radar reading indicated that our ships in the Gulf of Tonkin were under attack. While it was later revealed to be a mistake, our ships actually were attacked days later. The United States used this to enter the Vietnam War. On September 11, 2001, four planes were hijacked in American airspace. Two were flown into the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers, one was flown into the Pentagon, and another crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. The Bush administration used this to initiate wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Now, you may be sitting in front of your computer screen, trying to figure out what these four events have to do with each other – I don’t blame you. Well, amongst conspiracy theorists, all four are examples of false flag operations. They believe that all four events were orchestrated by the main benefactors — Nazis, Allied Forces, US war machine, and the Bush administration, respectively — in order to bring about the desired political or social results. Basically, they believe that governments are willing to kill and maim their own people, simply to get what they want.

This is where Loose Change comes into play. Loose Change is a video that showed up for the first time in 2005. After being spread across the Internet, the movie got three revisions, the most recent of which comes out on September 22. Loose Change is a movie that promotes the idea that 9/11 was an inside job, and that somebody implied to be within the Bush administration was behind it. While they don’t really go into the reasoning for this false flag, it is implied that Bush simply wanted to get rid of Saddam Hussein.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3Page 4
Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for robert-m-barga

Article Author: Robert M. Barga

Robert M. Barga is a student at The Ohio State University (Go Bucks) and is majoring in Political Science, with an American Policy focus, and minoring in English. He is an avid blogger on Whalertly, technology guru, and gamer (computer, table-top, and console). …

Visit Robert M. Barga's author pageRobert M. Barga's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Fran

    Sep 11, 2009 at 6:28 pm

    Well written review Robert. I may not buy into all of the 'conspiracy theory' in the movie, or your take, but I certainly enjoyed reading your review of it. Thanks!

  • 2 - Shock

    Sep 12, 2009 at 9:46 am

    I hear they include Sunjata's essay in the extras. AWESOME! Great undebunkable piece of writing. Amazing work Dylan.

  • 3 - Elvira Black

    Sep 13, 2009 at 3:09 pm

    Nice job, Robert.

  • 4 - barga

    Sep 14, 2009 at 5:18 pm

    Thank you Elvira

  • 5 - Jerry

    Sep 15, 2009 at 8:43 am

    looks good!

  • 6 - yellow publishing

    Sep 21, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    if you don't start thinking for yourselves soon there will be hell to pay.


  • 7 - Jet Gardner

    Sep 21, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    A belated happy mother's day

  • 8 - Robert M. Barga

    Sep 21, 2009 at 8:28 pm

    @7 huh?

  • 9 - Bob's ego

    Sep 22, 2009 at 12:29 am

    Huh?? Now Bob, we both know mother was here.

    She knows we've been a naughty boy! And she almost let the cat out of the bag..


  • 10 - Robert M. Barga

    Sep 22, 2009 at 4:39 am

    I assume that you are calling me 'bob' and that you are referring to a deleted comment (I did not ask for it to be removed, fyi).

    I am not Bob, but if you want to call me that, that is cool. As for the comment, it is not here anymore, so it is not relevant.

  • 11 - Cindy

    Sep 22, 2009 at 6:16 am

    lol @ #7

    Must have been puzzling until you figured it out, Robert.

  • 12 - Cindy

    Sep 22, 2009 at 6:17 am

    oh right, I was laughing at #8...ooops.

  • 13 - Robert M. Barga

    Sep 22, 2009 at 6:20 am

    I was just confused about what it was referring to, as I thought the comment was removed quickly and nobody saw it

  • 14 - Cindy

    Sep 22, 2009 at 6:26 am

    It still shows up in the 'fresh comments' even after it's removed from the thread. I saw part of it.

  • 15 - Robert M. Barga

    Sep 22, 2009 at 6:27 am

    oh, that could be why
    interesting

    thanks Cindy

  • 16 - enthusiast

    Sep 22, 2009 at 7:20 am

    history is a funny thing

  • 17 - Robert M. Barga

    Sep 22, 2009 at 7:22 am

    If you read the article, they found 'pebbles' that are either caused by thermite OR by a high explosive force that melts iron

    we already know that there was melted iron (kenetic energy has some power)...

  • 18 - enthusiast

    Sep 22, 2009 at 7:44 am

    Sorry Robert, where does the article mention 'pebbles'?

    Are you suggesting that the kinetic energy of the plane melted iron?

  • 19 - Robert M. Barga

    Sep 22, 2009 at 7:46 am

    I assume the article mentioned is the one that appeared in new scientist several years ago.

    I am suggesting that kinetic energy of the towers collapsing, mixed with the heat from the fires, melted steel. We both know that the fires themselves could not melt it

  • 20 - enthusiast

    Sep 22, 2009 at 8:07 am

    I'm afraid I gave all my New Scientist magazines to Freecycle some time ago!

    Here's an important paper from earlier this year, maybe this is the one you mean?

    Also, you may be interested to hear NIST actually deny evidence for molten steel at the site.

  • 21 - Robert M. Barga

    Sep 22, 2009 at 11:14 am

    doesn't mean i buy that they deny it

  • 22 - James McLue

    Sep 22, 2009 at 12:47 pm

    "hey also believe that the hundreds of governmental employees that would be involved could be quiet. "

    Just because we don't know the "how" of how it was done, does not mean we can assume *thousands* of people *had* to be involved. You'll tell me that God did it next. Investigation is the *only* way forward.

    If the explosive evidence is true, then sure, with even the most closed minds, you'd want to know how that stuff got into the dust of the towers? After all, there were no explosives on the plane...At least there are not on the flights I travel on...

    Peace.

  • 23 - Robert M. Barga

    Sep 22, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    Okay, how do you have a government plot without these hundreds invovled?

    The dust is not just from explosives

  • 24 - Awe

    Sep 22, 2009 at 7:26 pm

    Terrible review. Biased and poorly written. More of a hit piece than anything else. All these experts can't be liars and crack pots...

  • 25 - Carol Brouillet

    Sep 22, 2009 at 10:43 pm

    I disagree with Robert Barga's review, but then I did organize premieres of Loose Change- Final Cut and the most recent- Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup. I also organized the first march demanding a congressional investigation of 9/11 and have witnessed the cover-up, as well as an increasing number of admissions that the 9/11 Commission itself was "set-up to fail" and decided to lie to the public about what happened.

    I did not think very highly of Loose Cahnange version 1 when I saw it, nor version II. Dylan Avery was young and didn't really do all the homework he should have done to make a solid documentary, but then that was not his original intent. Originally the film he was making was supposed to be fictional. He has matured greatly over the years and done a considerable amount of research, and consulted with some of the top 9/11 researchers. He has also done some genuine investigative reporting himself. The latest Loose Change documentary reflects someone who has taken the time to look beneath the myths and legends sold to a gullible, manipulated public, to the actual historical events. False flag operations are not taught in school, nor is how the CIA operates common knowledge, nor covert operations.

    Many people who join the truth movement are upset by the facts that they encounter and start studying the topic, in hopes of proving uncomfortable facts to be wrong. When they discover that the facts are real facts, and that they have been lied to, by the media, in school, they are moved to learn more and challenge the more blatant lies continue to be told to expand wars and the already bloated military budget.

    I believe the intent of the film is to get people to think more critically and question the corporate spin used time and time again to get people to support wars, and the elimination of fundamental civil rights. The film is a wake up call. If it challenges your view of history, perhaps it is time for you to reexamine the past, and discover what the latest research reveals.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 09, 2010

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs

Upcoming Stories from Blogcritics
  •