DVD Review: La Jetee/Sans Soleil - Page 5

Vertigo lends a few touches to the two films, certainly, but mostly Joycean misdirections that too many critics overplay, and use to flub their assessments of the far superior works of Marker. In short, Marker played upon the hubris and gullibility of the critics likely to keep them talking about the films until superior critics could actually come along and unlock the realities. Again, this is the mark of a great artist.

So, on to Sans Soleil (Sunless), whose title is adapted from a song cycle by Russian classical composer Modest Mussorgsky. This much longer film follows the filmed globe-trottings of a fictive man named Sandor Krasna (the stand-in for Marker). It is a fictive documentary (but not quite a mockumentary) that flirts with some of the ideas expressed in Godfrey Reggio’s unnarrated Quatsi films.

Like the earlier film, Sans Soleil has a narrator, but it is not a fictive film, rather a quasi-documentary. The female narrator (Alexandra Stewart) reads letters from Krasna about his voyages from Iceland to Africa to Japan (where the bulk of the film is shot), with short trips to Paris and San Francisco (due to the Vertigo homage). The observations made by Krasna are beautifully reflected in the footage we see (unlike La Jetee, this film has moving color images, not just still black and white photographs). The film opens with an epigraph from T.S. Eliot’s The Four Quartets, from "Ash Wednesday":

Because I know that time is always time
And place is always and only place….

Aside from the homage to Vertigo, there is an even more penetrating one to Andrei Tarkovsky’s 1979 science fiction film, Stalker, wherein Krasna mentions a place where images are transformed, called The Zone. Through all its circumlocutions, the film does find its way back to its start, the images of a trio of Icelandic children, although the length of the film does not enable the viewer to get the same thrilling rush of recognition one does in La Jetee, wherein the panic of the lead character is felt by the viewer in a recapitulation.

Herein the narrative opening to Sans Soleil:

The first image he told me about was of three children on a road in Iceland, in 1965. He said that for him it was the image of happiness and also that he had tried several times to link it to other images, but it never worked. He wrote me: one day I’ll have to put it all alone at the beginning of a film with a long piece of black leader; if they don’t see happiness in the picture, at least they’ll see the black.

Continued on the next page Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4 — Page 5 — Page 6Page 7Page 8

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for dan-schneider

Article Author: Dan Schneider

Dan Schneider is the founder and webmaster of Cosmoetica: the best in poetica.
--
Film critic Roger Ebert calls Dan Schneider 'a considerable critic....'' that Dan Schneider (in regards to Ebert's writings) 'may well be correct in some aspects. …

Visit Dan Schneider's author pageDan Schneider's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Dave

    Oct 29, 2008 at 8:07 am

    Of course it is inconceivable to Mr. Schneider that the film may be about BOTH memory and perception.

    But of course, then he wouldn't have anything to act smug and superior about whilst talking about other critics.

  • 2 - io

    Jan 10, 2009 at 11:07 pm

    couldnt agree more with the previous comment. the films are about both memory and perception.
    from the moment i read him stating that vertigo is an overrated movie i knew i couldnt take him seriously.

  • 3 - Outofyourmind

    Feb 14, 2009 at 8:40 am

    Quoting: "one can understand why I was never particularly moved to engage the films of this man; especially considering that he was French, from that nation that launched the careers of such notable filmic failures as Jean Cocteau and Jean-Luc Godard."

    So you would never have watched French cinema because of a whole 2 French directors being failures? Surely that's not very constructive discrimination? That would mean that you wouldn't watch any American cinema on the grounds of how much junk they put out every week? I think American cinema is great, don't you agree?
    Cocteau a failure? Please develop... compared to what? Compared to "Terminator" in terms of box office numbers (since you mentioned Terminator in your critic)? What makes you say such a gratuitous, ignorant thing? The guy invented more than most can today with more technology and everyone at the time looked at him as the way forward for the new cinema... Get your head out of your brainwashed box, forget what you learned in the all-good-thinking schools and cinema academies (what's that suppose to mean anyway?) and embrace!

  • 4 - El Bicho

    Feb 14, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    Here's one that doesn't understand that reasoning

  • 5 - what?

    Feb 26, 2009 at 12:20 am

    Film, after all, is a medium founded and nurtured by the written word. Without a good screenplay, a film is just shadows on a wall."

  • 6 - Christina

    Nov 30, 2009 at 8:52 pm

    Anybody who would judge all of a country's cinema based on disliking some particular movie or director from that country lacks credibility as a reviewer. Those "filmic failures" you mention are actually considered renowned classic filmmakers, and its fine if you don't like them (you are obliged to dislike anyone you please) but stop trying to rewrite history with your shallow denunciations.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 13, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs